eusteus (@eusteus) header
eusteus (@eusteus) profile picture

coincidence doesn’t exist

Joined May 2023
Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)Photo by eusteus (@eusteus)
eusteus retweeted
11
8
1
214
10,447
lads. this tweet must of hit a nerve. I got the badge of honor =)))
judging by his most recent AI slop garbagio, referencing God creating bitscorns and frequencies of money, i would say that MichaelCocaineSaylor has reached next level in his substances journey. besides excessive cocaine use he is now playing with shrooms and 5-MeO-DMT...
20
2
1
98
10,253
eusteus retweeted
crypto would still be easy if cobie never invited ansem to his podcast the ladder got kicked down you'd be rich now everything up 50x
8
5
1
202
9,512
🤖 Made with AI
NEW: Amazon researchers are reportedly behind the jailbreak report that led to the U.S. crackdown on Anthropic’s top models.
140
1,527
86
21,861
973,833
eusteus retweeted
If Iran doesn’t capitulate this very day, President Trump will be left with no choice other than obliterate its regime by extending the negotiations by another 2 weeks. After 100+ days, may this serve them as a good lesson. No one fucks with President Trump
14
11
254
15,936
The Iranian navy, which has been destroyed eight times, has apparently closed the Strait of Hormuz again, because the United States, for the seventh time, won the war that wasn’t a war, so now the United States has to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the not-war began. The not-war began because Iran had uranium that was totally, completely, beautifully obliterated, so they can’t build the nuclear bomb they weren’t building, which is why the United States had to start the not-war it definitely didn’t start. Now the United States, which has nuclear weapons, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, because nuclear weapons are far too dangerous for countries with nuclear weapons to allow other countries to have. If the United States saw the United States doing what the United States does in other countries, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.
2,668
33,565
2,089
100,774
3,616,332
Replying to @heart_
2
1
15
362
GM, have a feeling they're gonna nuke us to to $58k today
2
229
eusteus retweeted
Saylor is up more on his BTC sells than his BTC buys.
13
20
1
442
24,836
$BTC moved surprisingly fast within the value area. I was expecting to get some reaction at the PoC and yet we swept the VaL overnight. Today we'll likely build a short-term base or even get a small relief. Any close below $65.5k (VaL) is a sign that $60k comes next fast.
1
240
Who's this online retard that I listened to that $HYPE is overcrowded trade at $30?
153
$BTC is in a very interesting spot. Makes me wonder if we’re dumping because insiders know that Saylor is selling and sells along with him, or do they just want him to sell more coins cheaper, therefore, front running his sells. Either way
134
If btc isnt at 30k in 30 days i will suck my own dick on livestream.
141
80
56
1,012
$BTC no more bullish arguments left. Pretty much all timeframes synced and are gradually trending down. Closed within the value area and below 2025 low. Anticipating short-lived moves up into the bands $74.5k - $75.5k early in the month which for now looks like additional sells.
1
2
231
$BTC since Friday, pretty much all arguments have been aligning for bearish continuation back inside the value area ($74k → $66k). However, yesterday we saw seller absorption at the 2025 lows, which is confluent with prior VAH.
1
1
540
This raises the question of whether we’re simply retesting this value area, just this time from the outside, and momentum will start shifting back bullish or if this is just typical illiquid weekend manipulation before we get a strong leg down next week.
1
107
I’m still swing short, but a weekly close back inside the bands above $76.1k would definitely concern me. Let’s see.
67
$BTC which way western man?
86
$BTC super important level at 〜$78.5k. Flip it and we get our leg higher. Reject it with daily MA crossover that's confluent with a HVN up there and we get our repricing lower. So far, price action looks distributive, but another pop higher still cannot be ruled out.
1
95
$BTC tried to short it a few times, but passive buyers keep absorbing all the sell pressure. Passive sellers aren't moving anywhere either. Even though it starts to look like a prior range reclaim, weekly close above $81.6k would confirm the acceptance.
1
102
If we clean this sell wall, I would like to see how price will react at $86k level where the 3D supply is confluent with the inefficiency.
71