ewan.eth retweeted
Ok I just read through vitalik’s paper and if the vision he outlined is executed the implications are absolutely insane especially for the app layer.
The paper is basically Eth’s plan on how they will enable computation off chain with Eth verifying the result (ensuring computation occurred and what it did etc etc).
Now what this means is the definition of “onchain” itself changes, because instead of every part of an app having to execute inside a smart contract you can push a huge amount of complexity elsewhere and still inherit ethereum’s guarantees, this really does open up a huge amount of design space especially for DeFi.
For example with lending you could have really sophisticated systems analysing collateral, liquidity, borrower behaviour and market conditions offchain, with multiple solvers or execution systems competing to produce the best outcome, like the cheapest liquidation route, best refinancing rate, best collateral swap or best way to match borrowers and lenders all while the protocol only accepts outcomes that satisfy its rules.
So basically a lot more of the smart stuff behind a financial product can happen outside the smart contract, while Eth still acts as the final layer that checks the rules were followed and makes sure the money moves exactly as it should.
The MEV implications here are quite interesting too because more economic activity happening before settlement means more value moves upstream into who gets the information first, who computes the best outcome and what gets presented to Eth.
But the thing I’m most bullish on is what this does to the TAM of Eth just because this vision means ethereum doesn’t have to be fast enough to do everything itself it just has to be able to verify everything that matters.
And that’s an enormous difference.
It’s literally a world computer.
The cryptographic world computer:
vitalik.eth.limo/general/202…
My attempt to express in somewhat concise terms the true meaning of basically everything planned to happen to Ethereum starting from the fork after Hegota. It's really not just a blockchain anymore. It's a hybrid architecture that combines together blockchains and modern cryptography, to enable much more powerful properties.
FOCIL, EIP-8288, Lean consensus, state management, formal verification, advanced mempool improvements (including privacy), and the longer-term specter of obfuscation all mentioned.
ewan.eth retweeted
u guys realize Lubin is going to max buy ETH which will make ETH go up which will make $SBET go up and then Tom Lee will get jealous and buy ETH which will make ETH go up, consequently $BMNR will go up and then Lubin will realize he needs to buy more ETH and then Tom Lee will game theorize and try to front run Lubin and then ETH will go up more so $SBET will go up which will give Lubin liquidity to buy more ETH which Tom Lee has to try to match in order to keep up so he buys more ETH, so ETH goes up, and then $BMNR will go up but Lubin will still be buying more ETH leading to ETH and $SBET going up right?
ewan.eth retweeted
I'm sorry, but if tokenization results in trillions of dollars of stablecoins, equities, and other real world assets onchain...gas tokens become strategic commodities overnight.
Is the gas token of Ethereum and other tokenization networks a strategic commodity of national security implications?
Chris Perkins @perkinscr97 thinks so.
ewan.eth retweeted
slowly at first, then all at once.
Ethereum.
Revolut, a leading fintech with 80 million customers globally, is launching a Euro stablecoin on Ethereum.
Welcome to @Ethereum, EURR.
ewan.eth retweeted
Revolut, a leading fintech with 80 million customers globally, is launching a Euro stablecoin on Ethereum.
Welcome to @Ethereum, EURR.
We have a plan to make Ethereum faster.
Ethereum should be much faster. A faster Ethereum is better for both Ethereum and ETH.
Many discussions in our offsite revolved around what I’d call fast Ethereum. We’ve already mentioned fast Ethereum in some of our updates, and I wanted to share a few notes on motivations, principles and concrete work.
---
Ethereum is the hardest credible settlement layer in the world, with hundreds of billions of dollars of assets attached to it. Its speed matters to onboard the global economy: payments, swaps, credit, all at the speed of the Internet. Fast Ethereum is about making our network move at the pace of users, agents and assets, between L1 and Ethereum’s growth engines, its L2s.
Fast Ethereum is about latency, about friction, about capital cost and about delightful experiences. Every second spent waiting for confirmation, or every minute capital sits idle between domains, or every minute that an asset issuer waits for settlement is friction imposed on the people and businesses using the network.
We think Ethereum can remove much of that friction without compromising the properties that make it valuable in the first place. This unlocks value that all users receive from Ethereum and its applications, in particular financial applications that are powered by natively onchain assets.
Bottom line: greater user value increases network value through network effects, increasing the value of the Ethereum platform and ETH the asset.
---
This informs some of the principles behind Fast Ethereum.
→ Security is non-negotiable. Safely operating onchain is the base of the pyramid of user needs. Clear signing was for instance number 1 user priority for a long time. Latency reductions cannot come at the cost of increased user risk.
→ Fast Ethereum 🤝 lean Ethereum. Lower in the stack, the Ethereum protocol’s value to the world is its hardness. lean Ethereum is a broad effort to upgrade Ethereum’s protocol for a new age driven by formal verification and cryptographic innovation. Fast Ethereum works to complement lean Ethereum with a strong focus on protocol design and performance engineering for a faster network.
→ User value is at the centre of fast Ethereum. This is not about showing better headline numbers than other chains and platforms. As long as the network remains at the security level that all have come to expect from Ethereum, speed improves everything on our network, on our own terms: fewer clicks to get what you want, less time spent waiting for an action to terminate, less idle capital blocked by settlement, better prices, lower costs, less intermediation and more open markets.
---
So how do we do this? Ethlabs is already active on multiple fronts, some shorter term, some longer term, some iterative, some transformative. No single upgrade will fix everything. But fixes compound with each other, each new fix unlocking more and more value over time.
We’re in it for the long haul, as are core developers and builders working on these issues. The main deliveries we’re currently active on: fast blocks, fast finality, fast confirmation rule and fast interoperability.
→ Fast blocks is Mainnet’s block time, set today to 12 seconds. Faster blocks improve UX, onchain markets and liquidity, censorship resistance and finality itself.
Block time is hard-coded to 12 seconds in many places, and removing this dependency is the first step. I proposed kicking off slot time decreases in Hegotá, with a one-time refactor to remove the hard-coded 12 seconds, and a first decrease from 12 to 10 seconds.
→ Fast finality is faster settlement of Ethereum, backed by the strongest assurances of any network. Faster finality reduces the time and the cost for capital to flow, between Mainnet, L2s and the broader economy.
A first major improvement to finality is developed by @fradamt, EF Protocol and Consensys TX/RX, towards inclusion in I* (the fork following Hegotá), bringing time-to-finality down from a quarter of an hour to a couple minutes.
→ The Fast Confirmation Rule (FCR) is faster settlement in the order of tens of seconds we can deliver today, for many use cases that don’t require the economic security of full finality, speeding up deposits from L1 to other domains.
FCR is provably secure under formally explicit conditions in ways that other confirmation rules (such as waiting for some number of blocks) are not. These less secure rules are currently in use by some centralised exchanges, bridges and L2s, and they also happen to be usually much slower than what FCR achieves.
FCR is close to production in all major Ethereum clients, and our team @_julianma @decentrek and @ox_shaman is actively working on its go-to-market. A major bridge has recently committed to offering FCR to its customers, as @decentrek noted in his last update!
→ Fast interoperability is about the free flow of all assets on our network, offering asset issuers the foundations of a robust stack powered by Ethereum.
Each of the previous items enhances interop speed in its own right. Beyond these compounding gains, a concerted move to real-time zk proving is a different tier of unlock: bridge flows from L2s to L1 remain slow, either due to the long challenge period of optimistic rollups, usually set to 7 days, or due to infrequent settlement of zk-rollups to L1, given the opportunity of amortising costs in batches. With zk becoming a commodity, we must ensure our ecosystem is ready to plug in to this new basic utility in order to reduce latency and improve security at scale.
We also remain active on broader interoperability UX questions, having worked on fast liquidity from intent-based bridges and execution standards such as ERC-8211.
---
To wrap up, we’re currently interested in two engagements from the community:
1. Hegotá priorities are currently debated for the next few weeks. We’ve already given our view as Ethlabs, ranking faster blocks as our S-tier choice: ethlabs.org/writings/hegota-…
Continuing to express public support for faster blocks, as users, builders or core developers is a critical signal to ensure block time is reduced asap. Hegotá is possibly the last window to get started for a few years—let’s not miss it.
2. As go-to-market for the fast confirmation rule continues, we’re reaching out to L2s, bridges, RPCs and centralised exchanges for integration.
If your product relies on some form of confirmation from Ethereum L1, we think a conversation would be valuable. Please reach out to @_julianma 🙂
Let’s grow Ethereum and ETH with a faster Ethereum.
ewan.eth retweeted
ethereum:native has been depressed since 2021
But fundamentals & adoption is stronger than ever
This divergence won’t last
ewan.eth retweeted
More than a year ago, the House passed the Clarity Act.
There’s been progress since — thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations took place at the staff and Member levels. The Senate Committees on Banking and Agriculture advanced their respective titles. And Senate Republicans produced a floor-ready product that, as I type this, is waiting for a vote.
It’s disappointing — but not surprising — that Senate Democrats are choosing politics on the cusp of a major victory for American leadership. Find another instance in history where Congress, when given the choice, opted to push an industry out of the United States rather than smartly regulate it. American Exceptionalism was once a bipartisan goal; if Clarity fails, I have serious doubts.
These same Democrats — many of whom have taken millions of dollars from the crypto industry — proclaim that Clarity lacks safeguards for consumers and falls short in countering illicit finance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Titles II and III materially uplift regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act — which Washington lobbyists have spun up as a boogeyman for certain groups of prosecutors and law enforcement — does nothing other than codify longstanding Treasury Department policy that’s remained consistent across Administrations: non-custodial builders and developers are not, and have never been, subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. And at this point, major law enforcement trades that once opposed the bill, including the Fraternal Order of Police, have now endorsed it.
The Senate needs to vote NOW on this landmark legislation. The truth is that Senate Democrats are afraid to advance the Clarity Act as they fear Senator Warren and the “Anti-Crypto Army” she once promised to build. In the days ahead, Leader Thune will put this theory to the test. Will Senate Democrats be on the side of American Exceptionalism, or will they opt to cede American leadership of a global industry for fear of the bespectacled squirrel’s Left flank?
America will lead or America won’t. It’s not more complicated than that. I believe Satoshi once said it best:
“If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry.”
























