
Cofondateur @Livrenoirmedia | Pdt de @cercleaudace | chef d’entreprise | Ecologie | Conseiller municipal | journaliste pour @Elements
Les Ormes sur Vienne
Joined November 2016
- Tweets16.6K
- Following1.8K
- Followers9.5K
- Likes21.7K
Pinned Tweet
Après 2 ans d’études, 12 semaines de stage, plusieurs dizaines de visites de fermes, je suis fier d’avoir obtenu mon bac agricole. Dans le chaos et le fracas du monde, apprendre à travailler la terre & à soigner les bêtes a été un grand soulagement. #agriculture #bac2024
François de Voyer retweeted
Alors que les stratégies partisanes et électoralistes encouragent les argumentaires simplistes et les oppositions binaires, que les aboyeurs de tous les camps appellent à la censure et au boycott de leurs adversaires...
François de Voyer retweeted
Ce sera un vrai problème dont je ne connais pas vraiment de précédent historique (il en existe sûrement): comment un pays gouverne contre sa capitale, d’autant plus lorsqu’elle concentre autant de pouvoir.
François de Voyer retweeted
Le Club de l’ISSEP a eu le plaisir d’accueillir Charles Gave (@Epargne_UDE) pour une deuxième conférence, autour de la question : « Le monde d’après le dollar ».
Une réflexion passionnante sur les mutations de l’ordre économique mondial et les équilibres géopolitiques de demain.
Un grand merci à Charles Gave pour la richesse de ses analyses, ainsi qu’à tous les participants pour leur présence et la qualité des échanges.
Rejoignez le Club de l’ISSEP et venez participer à nos prochains événements : club-issep.com/login
@Epargne_UDE
François de Voyer retweeted
🗳🇺🇸 Symbole de ces midterms catastrophiques pour les Républicains : ils perdent le contrôle des institutions mais leurs idées restent.
En Caroline du Nord, les électeurs élisent un Démocrate au Sénat pour la première fois en 10 ans mais ils votent pour des mesures républicaines :
- Montrer une pièce d'identité pour voter ✅️ 60%
- Limitation de la taxe foncière ✅️ 60%
- Baisse de l'impôt sur le revenu ✅️ 62%
François de Voyer retweeted
A fantastic analysis.
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more.
Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go.
Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all.
So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man.
Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure.
On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular!
What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it.
Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population.
The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world.
Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline.
Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side.
That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
François de Voyer retweeted
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more.
Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go.
Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all.
So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man.
Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure.
On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular!
What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it.
Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population.
The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world.
Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline.
Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side.
That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
François de Voyer retweeted
Above everything else, this right here is why Republicans got wiped out tonight. The leader of the party lives in an epistemic bubble of megalomania, where facts, reason, and data mean nothing. All the bad policies followed from this.
Quel soulagement que la défaite de #Trump !
Et ce n’est pas donner du grain à moudre à la gauche que de s’en réjouir.
Sa défaite implacable nous permet d’apprendre de ses multiples fautes. Le #RN a d’ailleurs conservé une saine distance vis à vis de ce second mandat où l’on est allé de trahisons en délires.
De l’ICE à l’Iran, du faux Doge aux corruptions les plus flagrantes, entre incompétence et clientélisme, ce président faraud et hâbleur a montré avec constance toutes les voies à ne pas suivre !
Donc naturellement, je me réjouis qu’il ait été puni car cela me donne l’espoir que nous ne reproduisions pas les mêmes erreurs grotesques.
Par ailleurs, je ne vois en rien en quoi Trump (comme Bolsonaro père et fils d’ailleurs) devraient être catégorisés à droite (dans la plus large acception du terme) au cours de son second mandat.
Il a trahi TOUTES ses promesses sur TOUS les sujets.
Alors, à moins de considérer que le mensonge, la corruption, la médiocrité, la vulgarité soient l’apanage de la droite, je ne vois vraiment rien de commun entre mon courant de pensée et ce monsieur.
Reste le mythe selon lequel Trump aurait « tué le wokisme ».
En réalité, il n’en est que le fruit pourri : c’est parce que le wokisme était en phase morbide qu’il a pu passer en 2024 malgré ses délires d’enfant gâté figé au stade anal.
François de Voyer retweeted
🚨 Un gros baron de la droite en Île-de-France rejoint l’UDR d’Éric Ciotti !
➡️ Xavier Dugoin, ancien député, sénateur, maire et président du département de l’Essonne, rejoint l’UDR.
➡️ Il appelle à voter Marine Le Pen en 2027. En avant !
lesechos.fr/pme-regions/ile-…
François de Voyer retweeted
💶 Financement des partis politiques : la gauche découvre avec 38 ans de retard une loi qu’elle a elle-même votée !
🖊️ Face à la haine et aux bêtises relayées par la gauche, lisez mon communiqué :
➡️ edwigediaz.fr/financement-de…
François de Voyer retweeted
🥵 L'actualité fait facilement oublier l'été météo hors-norme vécu en France, et pourtant...
Des vagues de chaleur à répétition, jusqu'à un tiers du pays concerné par des températures >40 °C fin juin, etc.
Un été "exceptionnel aujourd’hui"... mais "ordinaire demain".
1/3
François de Voyer retweeted
🔴Ça suffit ! Le RN n'a aucune leçon d'économie à recevoir de ce gouvernement qui désindustrialise la France !
Plutôt que de subventionner l’achat de robots et logiciels étrangers, orientons les aides fiscales aux entreprises vers des solutions françaises pour dvp nos filières 🇫🇷
François de Voyer retweeted
Le Club de l’ISSEP a eu l’honneur d’accueillir pour son premier débat l’@AbbeRaffray et @dr_l_alexandre autour de la question : « Intelligence artificielle : crépuscule de l’humanité ? ».
Une réflexion essentielle sur les défis que l’IA pose à l’homme et à la civilisation.
Rejoignez le Club de l’ISSEP et participez à nos prochaines soirées !
François de Voyer retweeted
Un grand merci à @jeansevillia pour cette très belle chronique à l’occasion de la semaine de sortie de mon livre évoquant la naissance de la droite en 1789 et les origines méconnues du conservatisme « à la française » @FigaroMagazine_ @EditionsPerrin
François de Voyer retweeted
« Je viens d'acquérir la conviction qu'un très faible taux de natalité est une conséquence de la logique égoïste d'Homo oeconomicus.
Pour avoir des enfants, il faut être, au moins pour une part de soi-même, altruiste. »
#Vendredilecture
François de Voyer retweeted
Si je comprends bien, la gauche veut criminaliser le ressenti d’au moins 60% des Français, qui constatent une « transformation démographique profonde ». Sauf si c’est pour s’en réjouir, évidemment.
Le même Ali Rabeh s’était distingué en distribuant des tracts contre le professeur de philosophie Didier Lemaire, devant son lycée, parce qu’il avait dénoncé l’emprise de l’islamisme à Trappes.
Jamais la gauche liberticide ne doit l’emporter dans notre pays.
Après l’attentat raciste à Trappes et à La Verrière, le maire Ali Rabeh propose de rendre illégale la théorie du grand remplacement, notamment en modifiant la loi sur la liberté de la presse de 1881.
➡️ radiofrance.fr/franceinter/p…
François de Voyer retweeted
Ça n'intéresse pas grand monde, mais la #sécheresse persistante en Bretagne est en train de virer à la catastrophe.
✅ Seule une politique active d'adaptation au réchauffement climatique anthropique permettra d'en limiter les conséquences. 1/2
#Sécheresse 🔴💧 3 millions d'habitants menacés de coupures d'eau potable, sommes-nous préparés ?
Les médias nationaux s'emparent quand de ce sujet. Il n'est pas suffisamment grave pour être traité ?
@TF1Info ? @franceinter ? @franceinfo ? @BFMTV ? @libe ?
#Bretagne
François de Voyer retweeted
Imaginez un président qui demanderait à ses conseillers, à propos d'un projet de loi qu'on lui soumet : "D'accord, mais quelle était la loi à ce sujet dans la Rome antique ?"
C'est ce que faisait Bonaparte d'après le conseiller d'État Pierre-Louis Roederer, cité dans l'excellent livre d'@eligidius, L’Empire des mots.









































