fero (@ferologics) header
fero (@ferologics) profile picture

10x 360 no-scope dual-wield staff über-engineer

(x,y,z)
Joined December 2012
Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)Photo by fero (@ferologics)
Attention all companies: I never want to use your AI assistant on your website. I want to use *my* AI assistant on your website
223
458
117
7,952
228,530
an engine, not a camera
2027 is gonna be about engines
36
same as tying your shoelaces
If you know where you live, you're ngmi.
1
81
good prompt "find all of the implicit state machines in my app"
159
380
262
8,275
1,982,790
having children must be radicalizing
1
31
claude solving alignment: subconsciously programming world population to ideologically align with it
is anyone else’s claude making them retarded
38
anyone with distribution is running some variation of vercel labs
1
1
53
fero retweeted
272
851
246
20,227
1,855,484
many such cases
I ripped my pi subagents out late last week and the velocity and quality of what I ship has not decreased while my token usage has plummeted.
3
240
We are looking for teammates who operate with intensity, integrity, and have a yearning to craft software and open protocols that strengthen human agency with us earendil.com/join/
32
50
16
1,211
189,902
llms truly have a skewed notion of time
35
a16z? the famous media company?
Watch, they’ll act like they knew this was going to happen and cover up their fraudulent claims that we were headed towards the singularity. Everyone has been lying and/or in a state of psychosis. Most believe in this technology the same way they believed in crypto. Market larp.
42
very illuminating
a16z always intended to be a media empire. This is the story of how it was built. As one of a16z’s earliest employees, Margit Wennmachers laid the foundations for a16z’s marketing operation. In this conversation with Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, she shares stories of telling Marc to write Why Software Is Eating the World, getting Ben on the cover of Fortune Magazine, and finding that no publications were willing to run Marc’s now famous It’s Time to Build. The conversation also covers why founders should have a public voice, how a16z learned from CAA and changed venture, the power of authentic personality-driven media, and how the role of traditional media has changed. 00:00 Introduction 00:43 Meeting at The Creamery: When the firm had no office 06:24 “Treat LPs like mushrooms” 11:00 “We don’t have products. We have people and ideas” 14:45 The Fortune cover that started a war 28:03 Software is Eating the World: One draft, no edits 29:45 When nobody would publish “It’s Time to Build” 33:36 Why Ben wrote a book 41:30 “You can’t market a company without a character” 50:33 The GPT test for human communication 53:30 “How many people have something to say every day?” 57:00 Every company needs a personality @wennmachers @pmarca @bhorowitz
46
The AI bros pivoted FAST 😂😂😂
🌊💙 WE WERE ALWAYS BLUE
78
236
24
4,553
486,893
brave day to launch a product
3
45
imagine having to bench to arrive at this conclusion. gstack is such a great example of what NOT to do.
garry tan spends $200K / yr on tokens via a special Claude Code setup that has 23 skills to cover CEOs, designers, eng managers, etc sounds impressive! or bloated. just like more programmers isn't always better (IBM has 295K employees), or how people used to be proud of their fancy prompt engineers... do elaborate coding agent setups actually help? we ran a test. we benchmarked coding harness setups on 100 software engineering tasks from sudo L7. one of them had 37 skills, spawned 17 agents, and cost 8x as much. *and it performed worse than vanilla Claude Code.* in fact: the best performer was simply thinking harder (xhigh effort) with no extra coding add-on at all.
2
48
garry tan spends $200K / yr on tokens via a special Claude Code setup that has 23 skills to cover CEOs, designers, eng managers, etc sounds impressive! or bloated. just like more programmers isn't always better (IBM has 295K employees), or how people used to be proud of their fancy prompt engineers... do elaborate coding agent setups actually help? we ran a test. we benchmarked coding harness setups on 100 software engineering tasks from sudo L7. one of them had 37 skills, spawned 17 agents, and cost 8x as much. *and it performed worse than vanilla Claude Code.* in fact: the best performer was simply thinking harder (xhigh effort) with no extra coding add-on at all.
1
4
90
10,288
imagine spending half a billion in donations knowing the flip-side is losing hundreds of billions in market value, and still getting the hatchet
2
37
bloodbath
2
158