FORMAL REPORT: Suspected Violation of Love and Deepspace Terms of Service Public Reading of Leaked Content @InfoldGames_ @Love_Deepspace I am submitting another report concerning an individual publicly advertising an X Space dedicated to reading alleged unreleased Love and Deepspace content. Account: @ calebsbloom Display Name: Fefy | Caleb’s baby sister Hunter ID: 82000231509 The account publicly promoted an X Space titled “Leyendo los leaks” (“Reading the Leaks”), which attracted approximately 275 listeners. This raises concerns regarding the potential unauthorized disclosure and public dissemination of confidential game content. RELEVANT TERMS OF SERVICE: Section 7.4(2) — Unauthorized Access to Confidential Content Prohibits reverse engineering, disassembling, decompiling, or attempting to discover confidential content, including unreleased game elements contained within installation packages. Section 11.1 — Intellectual Property Rights Establishes Infold’s intellectual property rights over game content, including text, artwork, audiovisual materials, and other protected creative assets, and restricts unauthorized distribution. Section 7.1 — User Responsibility Establishes that users are responsible for actions performed through their game accounts and content they publish, subject to applicable law. Section 7.5 — Enforcement Authorizes Infold to take appropriate measures when prohibited conduct is established, including publicly disclosing relevant punishments. Section 6.1 — Enforcement Measures Provides additional authority for Infold to take measures under its Terms of Service. The public promotion of an event explicitly titled “Reading the Leaks” warrants investigation to determine whether confidential scripts, character lore, or other protected game material were disclosed without authorization. I respectfully request that Infold Games investigate this incident, review the attached evidence, and determine whether violations of Sections 7.4(2) and 11.1 have occurred. If violations are confirmed, I request appropriate enforcement under Sections 6.1 and 7.5. Your Terms of Service explicitly protect unreleased game content and your intellectual property. These protections should be meaningfully enforced. Please review this report and take appropriate action.

A story in 3 parts

Let me emphasize the question YOU asked and the answer you received. “You wouldn’t consider this gore, right?” The answer, simplified: Yes, it can be considered gore. There’s visible blood and a depiction of an animal being attacked. And just in case you need a clearer explanation, here’s a dictionary definition for reference. 📸 Now, she’s not “mad for no reason.” She’s upset because comparing a playful fan art of Valko and Fish Rafayel, where there’s NO blood, no visible injuries, and both characters are very much ALIVE, to a drawing depicting a dragon biting a bloodied animal is ridiculous. And the hypocrisy becomes even more glaring when the person sharing this comparison has harassed artists simply for drawing Valko, even when he’s depicted ALONE. So yes, she has every right to be upset, to call out the double standards, and, most importantly, TO BLOCK YOU “Overreacting”? 😭 You’re the one who went out of your way to quote-retweet the post because you apparently couldn’t just scroll past it, yet you have the AUDACITY to accuse someone else of overreacting? Nobody owes you access to their account, their art, or their peace of mind. Blocking isn’t harassment. It’s a boundary. And people are allowed to have those, whether you like it or not