my dream is to marry a brain surgeon shawty who makes $1m+ yearly so i can stay at home and lose 10k/mo trading hyperliquid perps
What happened to @LunarClient?
I remember in 2020 it used to be clean and scary fast.
Unfortunately, it runs like a mess now.
I used to get 1,000+ frames-- now struggle to hit 150 on 1.8.9
Nothing has changed. 1.8.9 hasn't changed in over 10 years.
AI code bloat? Who knows.
why do you have to pay tax to buy things on income that was already taxed?
i will never understand this.
fredorsomething retweeted
Looks like Polymarket investors got SCAMMED
> In August they bought $1B at $21B valuation
> Now they can't sell even $5k at $11B valuation
that's a solid -50% in 48 days
and even at that price there are NO buyers.
A2DAO, a crypto OTC platform recently listed a sale for Polymarket equity at $11.65B valuation ($112 per share)
For the 2 days that the campaign was online only $5k worth were bought out of the $2M proposed for sale.
They sale was supposed to last for 20 days but they just removed it from the platform entirely.
Ironic.
VCs thought they were going to IPO and dump on the public, yet they are the ones that got dumped on
fredorsomething retweeted
$250k for a full chain is robbery.
For the second time in Google Chrome’s history, Google awarded a $250,000 bounty for a full-chain exploit… to @XBOW. Here’s the full story:
At an all-hands at the start of 2026 in Malta, I set the team a crazy challenge. A full-chain exploit of Chrome by the annual Black Hat cybersecurity conference in August.
I believed there were few better tests of whether @XBOW could move beyond web applications to desktop software, servers and devices.
Chrome is one of the most hardened pieces of software on the planet, used by more than half the world’s population.
A full-chain exploit lets an attacker take total control of a machine, where they can read every email, password and bank login the user types. You don’t need to download anything or click a phishing link. Visiting the wrong site is enough.
So @moyix, Andres Luksenberg, Baul Lee, and Willem Pinckaers took on the challenge along with a fifth teammate: OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol.
They built a chain they thought would win, but Google told us they already knew one of the bugs.
We were already in Las Vegas for Black Hat and DEF CON, and the team didn’t want to go home without the win.
So Brendan and the agents built a new exploit in just 6 days.
We submitted it to Google and waited.
The news came through that we'd done what should’ve been impossible. A full-chain bounty of $250,000, the first awarded under Google’s 2026 rules.
It took just 6 days and $40,000 of compute to construct an exploit that affects a billion users of Chrome on Windows. An intelligence-agency veteran told me his team used to spend 6 months on this kind of vulnerability.
My takeaway: the cost of finding truly critical vulnerabilities is collapsing, for attackers and defenders alike. Restricting powerful models is not the answer; GPT-5.6 Sol is already public.
But defenders have one advantage attackers never will: they can test their own code first.
Assume your software is exploitable. Whoever is hunting your bugs has the same building blocks we did.
This is cause for urgency but not panic.
XBOW is now developing an autonomous product for testing compiled software (desktop applications, servers, embedded devices), and partnering with the world’s top organizations to design that product.
If you’d like to be one of them, get in touch.
P.S. Restart Chrome whenever the Update button appears!
NOBODY wants AI wearables.
If you want to properly measure a founder’s intelligence, ask them whether they think wearables are useful, or just a stupid gimmick.
If you’re a man and I catch you wearing some bracelet-GPT, you’re now a woman.
This is what sucks about @Polymarket
Nothing is EVER right to begin with.
They ONLY listen and make things right once you publicly throw a huge fit & get others to join your cause.
What SHOULD just be a simple fix ends up needing to be a social movement on X 😭🙏
fredorsomething retweeted
Polymarket is not paying multiple markets, for example "Will the Catholic Church publicly excommunicate anyone else in 2026?". It's a market that already qualified for resolving IN AUGUST.
In Polymarket is not the platform who resolve markets but a small set of people who have whitelisted wallets by UMA. If you want a market to resolve you need to find one of those people and pay them $750 for the bond (so they don't risk any money).
It's a perverse system and a lot of people end up selling their positions at market at a huge discount instead of waiting for resolution.
Are there any KOLs that people actually like?
I find 99% of tweets by these accounts to be super spammy/annoying, (or it's just so clear to me that their posts are engagement bait).
Grok 4.7: Waaah, I can't pull images from the web because I need licensing.
Grok 4.6: Would you like me to commit crimes and send cryptocurrency directly to your wallet address?
fredorsomething retweeted
🚨 Today we're exposing Car (@CarOnPolymarket)
Polymarket's most visible KOL
Still a Polymarket "community mod".
Also, the biggest extractor in the space, using:
-- Bot accounts funded by his wallet within seconds of creation
-- UMA oracle manipulation on his own bets
--Callouts, then deleted tweets
All while booking $1.5M+ in Polymarket profit
It is not AI slop. All data is verifiable and published.
Let's dive in 👇
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🛡️ FIRST, THE BADGE
Polymarket's own API, today (30 Sep 2026):
"name": "Car" · "verifiedBadge": true · "communityMod": true
Check it yourself 👉
gamma-api.polymarket.com/pub…
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔮 THE MACHINE
In July 2024, Car's wallet sent an empty wallet 888 USDC.e.
That was the birth of what we call the "oracle wallet".
Over the next two years, Car's wallet sent 899,389 USDC.e through Polymarket's own bridge, plus 39,299 USDC.e directly.
8 more wallets belonging to Car filed 235 proposals and 45 disputes on 264 markets.
He was using them to vote for his bags
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1️⃣ "I HOLD 40K YES SHARES" · Apr 23, 2026
02:04 UTC, Car on X: "I hold 40K YES shares."
02:15, the oracle wallet proposes YES on "US x Iran ceasefire extended by April 22?". Car holds 44,785 Yes.
It gets disputed within 22 seconds. UMA's voters rule it "Too Early".
02:45, flying-wheel, an account funded with $100,000 of Car's money two days earlier, starts buying the other side: $135,405 of NO.
The market resolves NO. flying-wheel cashes out $142,829.
2️⃣ HIS BEST MARKET EVER · Jun 14, 2026
"US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 15?"
Car buys $37,126 of Yes as the price climbs from 26¢ to 77¢.
82 seconds after his last fill, the oracle wallet proposes Yes.
Car in the comments: "Proposed to Yes. This market will resolve to Yes in about 2 hours."
Profit: +$45,376. His best market ever.
3️⃣ THE PUMP · Jul 3, 2026
"US x Iran diplomatic meeting by July 3?" There was no meeting.
10 hours before the deadline, the oracle wallet proposes YES anyway. Car holds 2,577 Yes.
The price jumps from ~20¢ to 30-35¢. He sells every single share into the jump.
UMA: Too Early. The market resolves No.
👉 That's 3 of 280 oracle actions.
The site has 7 second-by-second replays and 100 timeline events, including:
• a correct answer the oracle wallet disputed while Car bought $98K of it
• bond money wired to him by traders holding his side
• a proposal the oracle wallet disputed itself
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🤖 THE ACCOUNTS
Car has at least 16 Polymarket accounts. They got their first dollar from Car's wallet, or from a wallet it funds, minutes after they were created.
15mmarketslol: 48 seconds. flying-wheel: 63. notworthit: 65. inshallahthisworks: 66. plzmoneyyyy: 100.
Some trade like machines: lolzzzlol made 141,555 trades; plzmoneyyyy made 6,962 in 18 hours.
Some trade with him: CarComboCup crossed Car's orders 24 times in 33 minutes and handed him exactly $1,601.50.
And the money comes home: $463,515 back to Car.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🗣️ WHAT HE SAYS vs WHAT HE DOES
On X, he told everyone: "I am not associated with Polymarket. I am a normal trader."
He was already wearing Polymarket's badge. A month later, he announced, "I'm now the first and only verified account on @Polymarket", 16 minutes BEFORE Polymarket announced verified accounts.
In market comments, he taunted anyone who challenged his wallet's answers:
💬 "instead of disputing you could also just donate 750$ to me"
Three Yes holders later paid him exactly 187.5 each. A quarter of the bond.
On another market:
💬 "I proposed this and im gonna push this through."
When a wallet his money funds disputed a proposal, he wrote:
💬 "i didnt dispute it. but i will dispute the second one"
A trader replied: "You did. It's your address lol"
77 minutes later his wallet sent the disputing wallet $555. Just enough for another bond. It disputed the second one.
Healso ran a sponsored ad for a UMA voting pool that "resolves Polymarket disputes", while the oracle wallet held a seat on UMA's approved-proposer list.
🗑️ Then he deleted it.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
On Sep 6, after four monthly checks under UMA's own 95% accuracy bar, UMA removed the oracle wallet.
Polymarket still shows him ✅ verified and 🛡️ a community mod. He's still trading.
@Polymarket @UMAprotocol
DETAILS HERE:
car-polymarket-oracle.pages.…
