Pinned Tweet
Anyone remember when Craig Wright posted "signatures" from block 9 on the @satoshi account (via @andyrowe)?
People noted that these forgeries could be made by anyone.
But did you know that these particular signatures are *provably fake*? #FaketoshiFail
I'll explain...
1/6
You just described the value of a full node as a user. You use it to make sure the blocks you receive meet the rules you want enforced, even if the majority of mining power is breaking those rules.
1
1
181
Owning a handgun is generally illegal in the UK.
Anyway, here's Craig showing off his "9mm Rutger[sic] P85" at his home near London.
Hey, @rodarmor, before you get BSVers too worked up, maybe check your facts.
Satoshi’s original code had an explicit 32 MiB block size limit.
Joseph P Gardling retweeted
Replying to @Zectro1
The sun: *rises*
Random BSVer: Incredible. Craig truly is Satoshi
Random BSVer, weeping: BSV is Bitcoin
Craig's not Satoshi
Craig in 2009: "I use PGP desktop these days for PGP."
Satoshi used GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Craig can't code, part III. (Links below)
Back in 2009, he kept a blog about an IT course he was taking, and one of the entries had the following PHP code, ostensibly written by Craig:
Here's the diff (adjusting for newlines):
We can see that Craig merely modified a few existing comments and added a comment starting with three backslashes (LOL).
He "forgot" to fix the unmatched parenthesis in the return, the nonsense loop condition, etc.
3
34
1,468
Links:
Part I: teapawt.net/gardling/status/143062…
Part II:
teapawt.net/gardling/status/143089…
Craig's blog entry:
web.archive.org/web/20151116…
The stolen source:
linuxquestions.org/questions…
Craig Wright in 2022: the Bitcoin whitepaper isn't MIT licensed.
Craig Wright in 2018: the Bitcoin whitepaper is MIT licensed.






















