Gary B retweeted
Eight-year-olds are told in one classroom video prepared by HMRC:
“You can think of tax as one shared bank account that everyone in the country pays into. The government is then in charge of looking after this bank account and sharing all the money to help everyone in the country. This money is also used to pay for the things that your town or city needs. When you’re older and you get a job, or maybe even start your own business, the taxes you’ll pay will all be added into this shared bank account."
Government School Materials Sell High Taxes to Eight-Year-Olds order-order.com/2026/11/09/g…
Does the government do anything other than enable infinite welfare including for those who abuse it?
🔴 Healey scraps crackdown on welfare fraud
Read more ⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
RT @an0n_Nic: Poor country with a rich region. You can’t tax your way out of poverty. The only way out is to growth, so there’s more for ev…
This quoted post is unavailable.
Gary B retweeted
No one likes rail replacement buses. But what’s worse than having to take one? Needing one and being told you’ll have to wait hours, or in some cases, not getting one at all. Why is this becoming increasingly common? Max Tempers investigates...
🧵
Gary B retweeted
England as a whole spends £1.25 in welfare for every £1 of income tax and National Insurance it receives.
For Wales, that number is £1.88.
This is on the list of things with certainty you know will not happen.
Exclusive:
Andy Burnham’s ten year plan will include the return of Sir Keir Starmer’s drive to scrap unaccountable quangos in Whitehall.
But there is a Burnham twist: departments have been asked to look for any powers held by ALBs that could be devolved to regional mayors instead.
The DVLA is among the agencies identified for possible axing or merger — in this case, with the DVSA, which runs driving tests.
No10 is using a military-style “compartmentalised” paper trail to stop the plan from leaking. The method was borrowed by John Healey from the MoD for his Budget.
telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
Gary B retweeted
Manchester United is the United Kingdom of football clubs.
Never thought I would see my beloved football club at the bottom of the league.
Both the club and the country spent years coasting on reputation while tolerating weak leadership, short-term extraction, and an unwillingness to make hard structural choices.
The Theatre of Dreams and the UK both still draw crowds on the strength of what they used to be; both are now discovering that brand and nostalgia only postpone the reckoning.
Gary B retweeted
This idiot is easily, in a crowded field, the worst member of the plp. Possibly the worst member of parliament
🚨 NEW: Labour MPs have summoned c2c rail bosses to explain the worsening train delays following nationalisation
Since being nationalised, the proportion of trains arriving on time has plummeted from 94% to just 71.5%
[@thetimes]
Gary B retweeted
The most uncomfortable welfare report for Labour may not be the one Alan Milburn is about to publish.
It could be the one he wrote more than two two ago.
Back then, he warned tackling Britain’s worklessness crisis required immediate action.
Now the welfare bill is heading towards £431 billion, the OBR is questioning whether employment schemes will deliver the promised results and even the Tories’ proposed £36bn savings wouldn’t bring the bill below its current level.
My long read 👇
thesun.co.uk/news/40942373/l…
They can’t build the houses they promise, so they have absolutely no hope in doing any of this.
What they will do is consult, report, quango and regulate.
A common Westminster mistake is to look at big moments in US politics and assume the same battle lines will be drawn here. AI and the mid-terms are a good example of this.
The easy assumption is that a big polarising debate on data centres is about to hit the UK, just because it has in the US. But that ignores two important facts.
First, the government has watched the free-for-all in parts of the US, has learned lessons from it, and is setting out a different approach. We do need to secure grid connections for strategic data centres, and we are setting up a Ministerial Control Centre to do just that. But move too quickly without bringing communities with you, and people understandably start worrying about the impact on their area and asking what they’re getting in return. That's why we're putting protections in place, to prioritise data centres only where they meet the tests set out in our Data Centre Covenant published at the Budget.
This means data centres have to lower electricity bills for other users, minimise and report on water usage, support our reindustrialisation objectives and support UK sovereignty. And crucially, it means agreeing to the principle that local communities around new infrastructure should share in its benefits - both through jobs and wider support.
Second, our problem is not that we have an abundance of data centre construction that our politics needs to reckon with, it's that build out is slower here than it could be. 15 of the world’s top 20 largest data centre markets are in the US. None are in the UK. The pace of investment here is, frankly, too low for what we need to stay at the forefront as AI technology develops. High electricity costs and slow grid connections (thanks, Conservatives) mean we haven't been near the top of the list for investment, and too often we're reliant on AI infrastructure overseas. The Budget last week set out a new direction to change this for all business and households, but we can't turn this round overnight.
Data Centres today are essential infrastructure. They underpin much of everyday life in the UK, from banking and shopping, to public services, to helping doctors screen for diseases. AI makes that infrastructure even more important and as AI becomes more widely used across out economy, Britain will need more of the data centres that support it. But we won’t allow that growth to come at any cost. We’ll protect communities. And we’ll make sure local people benefit.
Gary B retweeted
I think salary disclosure in job adverts is probably OK in isolation, but my concern is that it's part of a greater govt pay transparency drive which will lead to issues. Some thoughts:
-- always remember that pay transparency works both ways, employers glean information too
-- If rules around salary bands are too narrow, this could snuff out employer flexibility to pay more for exceptional talent
-- it imposes greater inframarginal costs on employers, raising the cost of hiring (i.e. any recruitment premiums trigger demands for matching increases from existing employees)
-- will be abused for equal pay suits, especially within our present "equal value" framework, which is actually the primary justification for these sorts of drives
-- the above often results in men - who benefit from "haziness" in the job market - losing out & further pay compression (see effects of Colorado's pay transparency drive, which led to a reduced gender pay gap, but pay actually *falling* for men)
Gary B retweeted
"Just before it was nationalised 94 per cent of its [c2c's] trains arrived within five minutes of the scheduled time. The latest available data from this August showed this had dropped to just under 71.5 per cent of trains."
The UK will slow down on AI because of growth minister
UK will not slow down on AI despite backlash in US, says growth minister ft.trib.al/VPcWWu2
Gary B retweeted
Do politicians even like pubs?
@Matthew__Bowles considers.
thecritic.co.uk/do-politicia…
































