actual bear pretending (poorly) to be human professor @uchicagohistory | author w @jan_dutkiewicz FEED THE PEOPLE! @BasicBooks | https://xitter.cf/t.co/n88u53gMfS

Chicago
Joined July 2011
Replying to @gnrosenberg
Sorry what?
11
1
90
For some reason my book is selling for $1.99 on Kindle.
3
7
43
1,703
Reading Wittgenstein lectures? Correcting Noah Smith? Walking next to the lake? Could this day get better?? Yes. I put up a new PR on the stacked Turkish getup: 120lb (80 + 40) or 54.5kg! Left and right!
2
1
10
757
No. It’s nothing like that. Holmes is a sentient being capable of knowing. A knife is not a sentient being capable of knowing.
People who ask whether Elizabeth Holmes "knows she's lying" are asking the wrong question. It's like asking if a knife knows it's cutting.
2
3
1
39
1,702
This is what happens when I take a break from reading my Wittgenstein lectures to check twitter.
1
2
207
bearistotle retweeted
If I met the Cenobites I would ask for a billion dollars or something instead of "sensation." What the fuck kind of shit do you expect asking for something like that. Dumb ass
48
155
10
5,431
107,980
Fixed it for yah • 1807 AD: Hegel is wrong • 1843 AD: Kierkegaard is wrong • 1844 AD: Marx is wrong • 1887 AD: Nietzsche is wrong • 1903 AD: Russell is wrong • 1921 AD: Wittgenstein is right • 1927 AD: Heidegger is wrong • 1966 AD: Foucault is wrong
A Brief History of Philosophy: • 375 BC: Plato is wrong • 323 BC: Aristotle is wrong • 311 BC: Epicurus is wrong • 225 BC: Chrysippus is wrong • 364 AD: Hypatia is wrong • 413 AD: Augustine is wrong • 1020 AD: Avicenna is wrong • 1180 AD: Averroes is wrong • 1250 AD: Aquinas is wrong • 1320 AD: Ockham is wrong • 1641 AD: Descartes is wrong • 1675 AD: Spinoza is wrong • 1739 AD: Hume is wrong • 1781 AD: Kant is wrong • 1807 AD: Hegel is wrong • 1843 AD: Kierkegaard is wrong • 1844 AD: Marx is wrong • 1887 AD: Nietzsche is wrong • 1903 AD: Russell is wrong • 1921 AD: Wittgenstein is wrong • 1927 AD: Heidegger is wrong • 1966 AD: Foucault is wrong
3
9
1,378
Wittgenstein on the MAGA freak out about Talarico’s “nonbinary” God comment.
8
636
Every time I hear this the Arcade Fire make more sense.
Canada would have no culture without Quebec
26
44
5
1,188
121,808
Yes, I know most of the band are English speakers not from Quebec. My claim is that they sound like this and I doubt that's a coincidence.
1
28
2,201
The tendency to counterpose "policies and reforms" (always assumed to be insufficient, pernicious, cowardly) to "structural transformation" (never concretely defined but rhetorically bold, courageous, virtuous) is undoubtedly one of the stupidest tics of internet leftists.
2
1
15
825
Just imagining scolding an apoplectic Trotsky for arguing for mere "policies and reforms."
2
143
I regularly walk past this photograph on my way to the pool at the Ratner Center and every time I see her, I wonder: what did she know??
2
1
23
1,168
This is the sort of lie you to tell to someone whose library books you don’t want to return and the sort of lie that someone who asks other people to return their library books for them would believe.
Johns Hopkins economics professor Steve Hanke writes in a WSJ letter to editor that many of his students don't know where the campus library is:
1
1
27
1,380
Adding: I'm a reader of Foucault and his critic. I feel no need to reject or embrace his thought in its totality, much less to defame it by fantasizing about his sex life. That common rightwing compulsion is cope and suggests Foucault's insights penetrated deep, indeed.
Ignoring the homophobia, it's interesting that Foucault lives in this clown's head rent free nearly a half century after he died. They keep telling us how nothing Foucault wrote mattered, but their stupidity keeps illustrating what Foucault called the incitement to discourse.
1
7
829
Ignoring the homophobia, it's interesting that Foucault lives in this clown's head rent free nearly a half century after he died. They keep telling us how nothing Foucault wrote mattered, but their stupidity keeps illustrating what Foucault called the incitement to discourse.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
1
43
3,486
The clown here being the guy writing in First Things, not Daniel, to be clear.
8
317
The flip side idiocy of “any art that does not advance x politics is bad” is Matt’s “no art that advances x politics is good.” Both are infantile and trivial attitudes.
The Soviets believed all art is political, and produced seven decades of shitty art
1
5
579
Thiel might give these lectures because it’s ego-gratifying for him to think people will finger him as the anti-Christ he’s lecturing on. Nobody’s biting, Peter! It’s be like Michael Jordan accepting Dan Dakich or some such as the anti-Jordan, just a huge blow to Christ’s aura.
1
5
473
The better question is who is voluntarily attending these lectures?!
170