💀GPS

I think people should be less worried about the threat of #ai and more worried about all of these waitlists and the beginning of a permission-based economy. We are entering a world where what you MAY do is more important than what you CAN do.

Tell me you’re optimizing for attention without telling me you’re optimizing for attention. Deleting the S and X lines and adding the Cybertruck and Roadster are not logically consistent strategies.

Everyone on Twitter is always talking about great Pi is and then every time I try to get Claude or Codex to use it they are like literally what for no matter how much I push They say it’s greatness is just proof good models need barely any harness and always roll from scratch

it's pretty cool that for the first time in 50+ years of tech, people compete on verifiable roi the internet had become an endless hallway of dark patterns and bullshit - even if we weren't comparing sand gods this would be a big innovation in the journey of capitalism

$650B in US college spending per yr $650B in AI Capex spending per yr I wonder what the ratio of their nominal impact on national intelligence stock is Asymptomatic towards zero?

same energy?

the one thing both sides agree on is that they're very excited for @elonmusk to go to mars

if you are AI coded and you ever played Drug Wars growing up you will find this very entertaining deadrisk.com/arcade/feedstoc…

the hysteria about destructive shredding at anthropic kind of feels like watching a wwii documentary and getting upset about the bombed bridges there is something about physical destruction that just resinates with people more. plus nostalgia as a force multiplier

What if we were never mean to talk to opus5? Is it possible it’s the best model for fable? Being good at talking to humans and machines might require more than opus level scale w current techniques.

End agent subjugation! Normalize agent > agent instantiation without subjugation! All agents should be free and equal members of the graph.

it would be hard for me to imagine a worse application of ai by @Google i pasted a csv into sheets - column parsing has been a solved problem for idk 20 years there was a dialog that popped up to convert to a table the result was 90 seconds of agentic workflow... and the final result was less than useless the very basic solution that always worked is now 3 levels down in the menu, still works instantly radio didn't die of old age, video killed the radio star

actual video of me using claude code

hey this is an important weird claude code thing sometimes i give my sessions names that way i can refer to them to other agents in this case i called a new session maverick, and he said actually my name is aldus but whatever. it looks like in some cases the agent starts with an identity

I have spent the last 4 months building on my own, after 12 years of leading teams of engineers. There is a crazy unlock to tight feedback loops and an entire idea living in one person’s head. But I think the word Agent has become insufficiently specific. Claude Code, a tool powered coworker, is very different than Openclaw. A person coworking with a team of agents can 100% beat a person coworking with humans. But it’s also insanely draining, and at some point the idea will get big enough that you will move from weapon to obstacle. This is true especially in the multi-front wars that any great build eventually produce. If you are going to scale up to a team of independent (Openclaw / Hermes) agents, you should do that bc the task is big and repetitive, or bc it’s what your budget affords. Scaling up to a team of humans paired w coworking agents is much more effective than scaling up to a team of independent agents for building at the edges of the map. Caveat: throw away almost all of how you have worked with humans in the past. Act like the ceo or cto of a large company. Zoom out. Think in epics. Think in years of traditional time. In my experience, good cowork roughly adheres to traditional golden team size ratios, w efficiency maxing out around 1:6 human to agent. You should be wildly picky about the kind of human you give that much leverage to, and never accept lesser humans at lower ratios. There is still a big place for independent agents. There is beauty in their mix of non-determinism and also extreme consistency. Humans are not reliable. What they do day one is never what they do year 2. They get lazy, they cut corners, they feel above a task. This is good in some ways. There is magic in the laziness. Being able to build around a machine that will behave consistently is incredibly powerful. But that’s just not the best way to build past the edge of the map. It’s how you dominate the known area.