
0x1A yo ; verifying things, for reasons... ; organized TYPED Floripa ; prev SRE @bookingcom and Rust & cryptography @opactprotocol
Floripa
Joined July 2020
- Tweets8.6K
- Following1.4K
- Followers858
- Likes201K
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @hackerdocc
hand-coding shit was fun, same as solving a sudoku. if you were motivated by solving logic puzzles as a day job then i understand why you feel miserable. solution? subscribe to NYT Games
I realized I'm motivated by hate for software and I'll only stop once it stops sucking
having to manually patch my memory system cuz now my agent has the memory of formally verifying a bug and thus all my conversations are triggering cybersecurity safeguards
stop coding unverified software. it will be utterly useless and i say this with all the care in the world.
i think we are witnessing an incipient singularity. maybe all the code will be verified within an year. if it sounds unreasonable to you, adjust expectations
"that's not what singularity means" well i could elaborate my point further, about how nobody can truly estimate the economic impact of buggy insecure software (which is basically everything), and how fixing that overnight would having profound ripples through scientific discovery, and how AI itself is made of software, and ofc by making software better we make AI better (we've been seeing this with e.g. autoresearch for faster kenels), but whatever, i prefer vagueposting prophetic thought-leading ai psychosis
google ai pro subscription is crazy value, i have it cuz of google drive and i also get more claude usage and a separate argon quota? (plus a bunch of other shit)
the most valuable lesson in interacting with agents is that when explanations aren't clear it's most likely the case that the explainer is bullshitting you
antigravity has no auto-mode? brings me back to one year ago when everyone was typing `--dangerously-skip-permissions`
young men's guide to playing the game in the age of AI
> spend your days developing formal semantics for programming languages
> go deep into debt by buying tokens for proving the correctness of critical software
> save humanity from a cybersecurity collapse by developing inviolable sandboxes, containing rogue agent swarms
> i guess avoiding a disaster doesn't make the headlines (anthropic bias or smth)
> everybody uses your software without realizing cuz claude 1-shots regurgitating it from the training set
> die poor and unacknowledged
> spend eternity in limbo cuz god isn't real
using decide instead of native_decide is quite dumb (during development, not CI): you spend way more compute and memory and even if native was ever to prove False that would be nice — you found a reproducible lean compiler bug by running CI
being right is extremely overrated, convincing people is more important and correctness has little to do with that
i'm starting to figure out how to make bait: just say smth interpretable in many ways (don't recommend it tho, too much noise)
what inspired me to post this was precisely that argon 4 was already doing some stuff related to nuclear fusion, so in fact i was being disingenuous
why are we spending tens of millions of dollars in compute just to give mathematicians trauma instead of... idk solving nuclear fusion?
did u know @Inria has that shitty PoW "captcha" (anubis) in front of their website? i think that's pretty unprofessional lol
i accidentally refreshed the page while that was going on and know they blocked me? lol (can still use another browser etc)




