Jason Harrier (@harrierj) header
Jason Harrier (@harrierj) profile picture

IP + AI attorney, Arlingtonian, Yinzer. Watch collector and bourbon aficionado. Bitcoin 🚀

Arlington, VA
Joined December 2012
Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)Photo by Jason Harrier (@harrierj)
Jason Harrier retweeted
no solo salió campeón siendo el piloto más joven de la historia de la f1 sino q encima comparte la victoria con 2 leyendas del deporte q admiraba desde chiquito, a mi si me conmueve
11
1,923
60
15,603
159,070
Jason Harrier retweeted
You're looking at the last two Mercedes drivers to win a World Championship 🤝
19
1,347
43
9,940
98,485
Jason Harrier retweeted
This trio ❤️ The perfect podium lift on the day Kimi Antonelli is crowned Drivers' Champion! 🙌 #F1 #MexicoGP
352
13,458
1,162
68,637
1,326,220
Jason Harrier retweeted
It’s almost incomprehensible how wide the distance is between someone who’s working at the frontier with AI and basically everyone else right now. The crazy thing is these lines are not converging, but only growing farther apart. If the curve of AI progress had leveled off, it would certainly have given most people and companies time to catch up or implement their workflows in a standardized way. The technology would have neutralized competitive advantage because everyone would be using it the same way. But what’s happened is the opposite. The curve of AI progress is basically going vertical right now, which means if you had codified your processes 3-6 months ago you’re likely already behind again. Now imagine most companies that kicked into gear a year ago and thought that they were done. Even further behind now. I’ve never seen a technology in my life and career that improves at this rate, which consequently means you need to upgrade your expectations at a similar rate. Our brains weren’t wired for this, and our organizational change management processes certainly weren’t either. With any form of recursive self improvement, things just get wilder. It’s a time when you will need to be constantly reevaluating the things that didn’t work just a couple months ago to see if they now can be solved. AI native companies certainly have a strong advantage due to this right now, so now it comes down to can the bigger companies keep up. Wild times.
879
1,178
489
9,755
3,179,045
Jason Harrier retweeted
every product i use should just be a headless mcp, that feeds into an agent, where i never have to think about anything underneath. except for our product, of course. in our product, customers love the ui and love us very much. we're special that way.
150
411
107
7,078
328,290
Jason Harrier retweeted
biglaw could massively boost PPP by training senior lawyers on AI and having them use agents like they do associates they don't do this because of a mix of inertia and the fact that all biglaw firms are in a weird conspiracy of preserving the collective hallucination of 'special sauce' prestige the first mover on this in the AMLaw 50 would get FUDDed by every other similar firm as going the way of commodization etc., they literally could not compete against this because if they lower their rates to show how much more efficient they now are, that will just be further evidence of loss of prestige it's a very weird market, it should not be this way but it's almost impossible to change
supposedly companies are seeing almost zero AI benefit but i've seen capable in house lawyers hoover up vast amounts of outside legal spend, jr associates would have almost no purpose if law firms unleashed Fable, and Barclays just cut 5k jobs, much à la AI efficiency claims, so the Apollo economist's claims seem dubious or trailing reality regardless which of the views is true tho, we could or will soon be able to use Muse, GPT, Kimi or even Grok or Gemini--it's the streaming wars AI infrastructure spend will be $3.5T (the subprime market was an inflation-adjusted $2.13T) not good
26
8
4
116
28,519
Jason Harrier retweeted
They said “Matt - you’re not allowed to make the firm swag” and I think they were probably on to something
30
105
4
3,227
72,886
Jason Harrier retweeted
Jason is 100% right. Code red. 🚨
as bad as things have gotten in the past 4 days, they are going to get a lot worse before they get better. security leaders, never let a crisis go to waste: please go to your boards and ask for help right now. not for ai, for the basics. (we need to hold on for ~18 months.)
92
157
30
2,024
859,005
Jason Harrier retweeted
Law firms are furious Anthropic requires a minimum spend before negotiating contract terms, which is awkward because that's also our entire business model.
TRACKED CHANGES: Law firm innovation chiefs left a private meeting with Anthropic unimpressed, per Bloomberg Law. “They need to wake up,” one said, citing two major dealbreakers: no hands-on training support and a minimum spend requirement just to negotiate custom privacy terms.
1
5
1
177
18,373
Jason Harrier retweeted
On this day in 1962, Dr. No—the first James Bond film—premiered. Bond sports a Rolex Submariner wristwatch. The Rolex Submariner is waterproof to 330 feet thanks to inventor Jean Perret who was issued U.S. Patent No. 3,362,154. #AmericasInnovationAgency #Patents #Trademarks
1
9
2
16
2,088
Jason Harrier retweeted
The only generation that knows how computers work is also the most relaxed about AI:
324
863
170
9,227
515,882
Jason Harrier retweeted
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
4,788
80,265
11,113
459,228
26,260,799
This! Omg, this!
“Your child’s assignment is in ParentVue. Have you checked Canvas? The homework is in EduSpot. The grades are available on Teacherly. I mentioned this in the WhatsApp group. It was literally sent to your comcast dot net email address. Canvas has it for you. It’s in Canvas.”
2
87
Jason Harrier retweeted
Launched during Dreamforce #DF26: Snap Specs Augmented Reality Glasses integrated to Salesforce, taking Field Service to the next level, powered by Agentforce. Smart glasses become a new surface for the Salesforce Platform. Connecting to customers in a whole new way...
3
12
4
94
78,219
Jason Harrier retweeted
bros 🤝
Same, Marc. Same. 😎
5
16
2
268
34,398
Jason Harrier retweeted
i think about this a lot
Marc @Benioff says he started Salesforce after he got a vision while swimming with a pod of 100 dolphins in Hawaii: "I was one with the pod." "I pay attention to my dreams. I pay attention to my visions, my insights. "Salesforce started because I was swimming with a pod of dolphins outside the coast of Hawaii, where I live. About 100 dolphins. I was one with the pod. And when I was one with the pod, all of a sudden in my mind, I saw this vision of what Salesforce could look like." "I went to Larry Ellison and said, 'Hey I think I'm going to quit my job.' He gave me $2 million, and we started Salesforce. That was 26 years ago."
7
25
2
774
152,678
Jason Harrier retweeted
Welles Crowther, a former Boston College lacrosse player who had a trademark red bandana, was working in New York on Sept. 11, 2001. This is the story of how he led people to safety after terrorists struck the World Trade Center.
185
4,713
597
20,087
5,721,468
Jason Harrier retweeted
Breaking down the MADRING 😍 High speed sections, followed by lower speed, for those prime overtaking spots 😮‍💨 #F1 #SpanishGP
42
400
37
2,584
330,449
If “all humans” is >10%, I am scared to know what the odds are for “a lot of humans”!
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
48
Jason Harrier retweeted
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
Replying to @hilbertspaess
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
4,810
9,858
10,487
59,101
43,304,195