Something I’ve been thinking about is how AI and the general automation of warfare changes the nature of who owns and operates force at scale
This obviously has very related political consequences that could result in the nation state as an institution being threatened
I don’t have an answer to where all of this leads. But it intuitively feels seismic in its importance and the direction of politics through the rest of the century and I don’t see a lot of people talking about it
If political movements in the 21st century look like clicking buttons on a screen
Then the next question is what is on the screen and what are the buttons doing
If Bitcoin is any indication it’s a buy button and you’re buying a coin that represents something
Once it’s sufficiently big the LARP transforms into something material via hyperstition
At that point that group of people have power to actually do things that matter IRL
I don’t expect this to happen often. It’s really hard to do and there is a lot of execution risk
But this feels like what taking @balajis’s quote seriously looks like
And most of crypto is not thinking about this. But maybe they should be
Those trends are what constitutes contemporary political forms. What good is it for workers at a contemporary factory to strike? That would simply hasten the factory going overseas
What good is it to protest onerous taxes when inflation offers an indirect, less obvious means

