Sad Note: Restricted in EEA, UK, and Switzerland.

Love is a hard thing because it starts, often, with purely chemical reactions in our brain. It just feels great. We don't want to lose that. Often we don't really know a lot about the other person beyond limited conversations and physical attraction. But it's a fallacy that's hard to overcome when we think about that fear because that fear of not doing the right thing is real. However: The correct answer is to simply be yourself. Easy to say, hard to do. The truth is, if your true authentic self is selfish, uncaring, or exhibits any number of flaws, that will ruin things. Although I did have a guy break up with me because I treated him too nice. The answer is, at its core, for me, a good relationship is one where there can be enough open communication (where you're not afraid to share your true thoughts) and also there's enough shared "debugging space" (so that shared random thoughts, ideas, concerns or feelings don't crash the whole relationship). In literature there often two kinds of relationships. There's the perhaps Tennessee Williams, Flannery O'Connor kind: depressed, suppressed, everything's wrong, you're going to end up killing yourself kind of dread from not being able to say who you are, what you need or want, there are nearly no healthy choices in sight. Then there's the approach from Rabbit Hole, where the engaging literary drama is the actual hard part of saying what you want, what you need, what you're concerns you, and other people's reaction to a character making a healthy choice. The hard part of telling someone you love them deeply but you absolutely can't stand their most beloved pet. Can you tell someone you're having ideation about somebody else not to seek permission and not to engender condemnation but to actually debug it down to the fundamental root causes (which likely have nothing to do with that person, sex, or anything closely related to that)? In a poor relationship you'll get a negative reaction to the top layer and never go further. In a good relationship there'll be listening, understanding, discussion, all sorts of feedback, shared emotions but ultimately you'll get to the root psychology (RCA). Ultimately building stronger, deeper, more meaningful relationships: that's 💕 love -- when "they" say relationships are hard work, it's these kinds of conversations and discussions they're talking about. – at Fresno, CA

And some radio active Tea!! If they can't meet in a neutral place, it's just not appropriate. Putin can come to Kyiv

New SF after-party invite: Come up to my place and let me show my open source embroidery

I feel like for $300 this is an affordable and useful indulgence unlike the $500 leg of Spanish cured ham I just bought.

I wish we could say entropy bad, and extropy good.. but it's not that easy. An evil police state can have lots of extropy. Some would say we are good if we are following nature -- too simplistic (as fun as it would be live naked in a grass hut in Bora Bora). It's not a tautology there is more good when we follow the nature of the universe using Extropian Principals, and less where we don't. Extropian Principles v3.11 Perpetual Progress: Constantly seeking more intelligence, functional order, health, and an open-ended lifespan while removing biological, political, cultural, and psychological limits. Self-Transformation: Committing to continuous moral, intellectual, and physical improvement through critical and creative thinking, experimentation, and personal responsibility. Practical Optimism: Fueling action with positive, rational expectations rather than blind faith or passive pessimism. Intelligent Technology: Embracing science and smart technology to transcend natural and biological constraints. Open Society (or Spontaneous Order): Supporting voluntary exchange, personal freedom, decentralized power, and a transparent marketplace of ideas while opposing coercion. Self-Direction: Valuing independent thinking, individual autonomy, and personal accountability. Rational Thinking: Placing objective reason, empirical inquiry, and open-mindedness above dogma and final authorities.

My p(doom) - the video game will be ported to virtually all platforms and systems – at Fresno, CA

That's how Russian and other disinformation works. Polarized groups to block natural allies

Even better when people claim you're on cap tables that you're not on

Yes it's poplar here. I do like them

Hope you're okay. Is it by choice or ?