Pinned Tweet
I trained an LLM from scratch on pre-1900 text to see if it could come up with quantum mechanics and relativity.
While the model is too small to do meaningful reasoning, it has glimpses of intuition.
When given observations from past landmark experiments, the model can declare that “light is made up of definite quantities of energy” and even suggest that gravity and acceleration are locally equivalent.
I’m releasing the dataset + models and leave this as an open problem to the research community.
I also include what this project has taught me about intelligence in a mini essay linked below.
🧵(1/n)
Michael Hla retweeted
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math.
It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training.
We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! 🧵
Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weigh…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math.
rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-sp…
github.com/RikiyaT/lm_und…
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0…
huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.…
Michael Hla retweeted
Language models can learn new tasks from just a few examples in their prompt, with no retraining. This is called in-context learning (ICL). Now genome language models can do it too.
With a handful of examples, Evo 2 ICL generates proteins, de novo antibodies, CRISPR-Cas9 loci, mitochondrial genomes and entire bacteriophages.
We can even use the synthetic sequences iteratively to construct a chain-of-thought (CoT) and achieve harder design goals.
New work with Yukun A. Hao, @BrianHie and team 🧵
Michael Hla retweeted
A guy built an AI that thinks it’s 1899, then tried to get it to beat Einstein to his most famous theories.
Michael Hla retweeted
We’ve spent the past year developing new primitives for GPUs. We believe this enables new algorithms to change how machines learn, open new markets, and dramatically reshape AI’s cost structure.
We have raised a $1 billion Series A, co-led by Index and Lux.
Michael Hla retweeted
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had
with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works
already-clean.goodfire.com/
Michael Hla retweeted
We are organising a workshop called Computational Future at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland, on 15–16 October. You can find the programme and speakers here: computationalfuture.org/
Quite a few members of the "Vintage LLM" community will be participating, either in person or remotely. @Dorialexander @ResObscura @hla_michael @status_effects @AlecRad @n_griesshaber @xLuo_CompLing @guohui_jiang @tpoibeau @zamir_ar @gri12345653
Scientists are probing whether language models trained on historical data can reproduce creative breakthroughs
go.nature.com/3Tld1sG
Sampling for posttraining is a massively underexplored direction, kudos to @aakaran31 for leading the way
SFT is not dead! 🥳
We found a way to make SFT rival current prevailing posttraining methods, often generalizing better and forgetting less than RL and OPSD. 🤯
Following our prior work on reasoning with sampling, we now introduce sampling to the posttraining stack.
1/n
1
13
1,145
Michael Hla retweeted
I built a wearable that predicts behaviors like nail biting, hair pulling, and skin picking before they occur.
I spun up a sensor rig, tested it on myself, and achieved an AUC of 0.868 using simple, standard white-label wearable sensors.
Full write-up and code below. I also wrote a separate, more personal post about what it's like to finally work on something you've put on The Pedestal for years.
(1/8)
“We can run trillion parameter sparse MoEs at 80%+ peak FLOPs without thermal throttling.”
From whitepaper to tapeout in 4 years. Congrats @robertwachen @UbertiGavin @czhu1729
We're coming out of stealth.
We've built our first racks after a successful A0 tapeout, $1B+ in customer contracts, and $800m raised.
Early customer tests show us achieving SOTA throughput, latency, and power efficiency on inference workloads.
Our first racks ship this summer.
16
1,623
I think one of the coolest results from our paper is how much biological information falls out of a masked language modeling objective.
Protein-protein interactions, contact maps, and enzyme function can all be extracted from the ESMC’s internal representations.
Even more interesting is that these patterns are not obvious from sequence alone.
Functionally similar proteins with very different sequences will activate the same SAE features. Endonucleases from opposite ends of the tree of life cluster together in latent space. A single feature activates on the primary catalytic motif across radically diverse proteases.
Why is this? Protein language models are, at their core, powerful compressors of biology. During training, the model will learn whatever representation it needs to in order to predict the hidden amino acid.
Sequences inherently convey information on downstream biological properties, and learning this signal happens to be quite useful in minimizing loss. Deeper understanding emerges out of necessity.
What's really exciting is that we can then use these unsupervised models + representations to learn more about unknown biology. There are many unannotated sequences that structure/sequence alignments cannot characterize. SAE features provide interpretable and semantically rich clues into the true nature of a protein when traditional methods fail.
@salcandido said it best: most of the time we use mech interp to learn more about language models. Here, we use mech interp to learn more about biology.
How poetic that techniques for better understanding “alien intelligence” could be used to better understand our own.
Today we're announcing ESMFold2, an open scientific engine to power prediction, design, and discovery across protein biology.
The new model delivers state of the art performance on protein interactions, especially antibodies, a critical modality for therapeutics.
We have designed and validated miniprotein binders and single chain antibodies across five therapeutic targets that are important in cancer and immunology. We are seeing very high success rates, and affinities at levels consistent with therapeutic activity.
We’re also releasing an atlas of 6.8 billion proteins, and 1.1 billion predicted structures.
ESMFold2 is built on a state of the art language model that has been trained on billions of protein sequences.
A world model of protein biology emerges through language modeling.
We’ve used the techniques of mechanistic interpretability developed to understand large language models to understand the concepts ESM uses to represent proteins.
The model’s representation space has a compositional organization of features across scales, levels of complexity, and abstraction, that reflects and mirrors the understanding of protein biology developed through a century of empirical science.
This understanding emerges without prior knowledge, just from language modeling of protein sequences.
Language models are becoming a powerful substrate to understand and program biology.
The design of protein interactions is one of the most fundamental problems in biophysics, and has critical implications for the discovery of new medicines. A simple gradient based search with the model was able to discover high-affinity protein binders.
I'm excited by the potential this has to accelerate basic science and the understanding of proteins. And especially for the new avenues it opens up for therapeutic design and medicine.
Brilliant work from @status_effects @AlecRad @DavidDuvenaud. Talkie is trained on 260b tokens of high quality historical text with some very clever evals (ex. can a historical LLM learn to write python?)
There are many interesting research directions building off of historical LLMs. Some of the ideas we discussed:
Speaking to Your Ancestors: In the line of persona research, train different temporal checkpoints, retrieve relevant context regarding the typical life of someone from that time/place, and allow someone to have a dialogue with an approximation of their great grandparents.
Historic Multimodality: Train a VLM on historical images, paintings, etc. Show it a picture of an iPhone and ask it to explain what it sees + how it works.
"Plausibility" SAE analysis: Have the model generate descriptions of real vs fictional concepts. Find the directions in latent space associated with "reality" vs "fiction". Then look at the alignment with those directions across different temporal cutoffs. (For example, does the nuclear bomb become more plausible in latent space as you approach 1940?)
Post-training without Modern Influence: How can we curate strong post-training datasets and reward signals without contamination from the modern day? (This was also an issue with Machina Mirabilis). One idea was to collect and OCR pre-1930 problem sets + answer keys from university archives.
Reach out if interested!
New work with @AlecRad and @DavidDuvenaud:
Have you ever dreamed of talking to someone from the past? Introducing talkie, a 13B model trained only on pre-1931 text.
Vintage models should help us to understand how LMs generalize (e.g., can we teach talkie to code?). Thread:
New Stanford self play paper with a clever reward term for utility of the synthetically generated problem. Very cool work from @LukeBailey181
Getting Llama to run on baremetal is no joke. Almost everything is implemented from scratch, from the cosine function to the communication protocol between pi’s.
Very cool project @masonwang025
i trained Llama 2 on a $5 computer with less processing power than a thermostat.
it’s called 🥧 PiTorch: an ML library for Raspberry Pi Zeros.
i cover how to make it from scratch, from writing assembly GPU kernels to sending bytes over wires. (no hardware background needed!)
1
19
2,954
You can play with one of the models at gpt1900.com
Seems to be pro-America and cares a lot about moral character.
NOTE: It’s single turn only, so treat it more as a Q&A rather than a conversation. This one is not good at physics, but interesting for history and future predictions.
I trained an LLM from scratch on pre-1900 text to see if it could come up with quantum mechanics and relativity.
While the model is too small to do meaningful reasoning, it has glimpses of intuition.
When given observations from past landmark experiments, the model can declare that “light is made up of definite quantities of energy” and even suggest that gravity and acceleration are locally equivalent.
I’m releasing the dataset + models and leave this as an open problem to the research community.
I also include what this project has taught me about intelligence in a mini essay linked below.
🧵(1/n)
Michael Hla retweeted
I have wanted this since December 1, 2022.
Replying to @hla_michael
Pretraining corpus was assembled using American and British books and newspapers prior to Jan. 1st, 1900, sourced from Huggingface and Internet Archive.
After extensive filtering, ~22 billion tokens were compiled into a training corpus. The best checkpoint was a 3.3 billion parameter model trained for ~5.5e20 FLOPs.
Many thanks to @karpathy for nanochat, @demishassabis for popularizing the experiment, Hayk Grigorian / the Ranke model team for prior work in this space. @masonwang025, @aakaran31, @LukeBailey181, @skippperD, @neo, and the countless others that I have discussed this idea with.
1
90
11,392
Github: github.com/michaelhla/gpt190…
Huggingface: huggingface.co/collections/m…
Full Blog Post: michaelhla.com/blog/machina-…
























