Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
The intellectual and societal cost of our collective obsession with publication count over impact is staggering. Curiosity is replaced by mass production, so much so that researchers are overwhelmed with the volume of published papers, described as the “strain on scientific publishing.”
If higher education wants to reverse course, institutions must confront the incentive structures that created this crisis. Three steps would meaningfully shift the culture:
Evaluate fewer papers, but more deeply. Promotion committees should assess a candidate’s top three to five publications, forcing reviewers to read the work rather than count papers and citations.
Broaden what counts as impact—especially teaching and research support. Institutions should formally weigh executive education leadership, research-teaching integration, creation of new or specialized courses, high-impact curricula, the ability to reach and shape large numbers of students, and the securing of grants or philanthropic gifts that enable consequential research alongside traditional research metrics.
Audit citation practices. Universities should monitor for citation cartels, editor self-citing and anomalous patterns increasingly penalized by indexing services.
insidehighered.com/opinion/v…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
An article in @insidehighered argues that universities may be helping to create the research integrity problems they are trying to solve.
The argument is simple: if we judge academic success largely by publication counts, journal prestige and citations, we should not be surprised when people find ways to maximise those numbers.
That can mean salami-slicing research, citation gaming, purchased authorship, paper mills and, increasingly, AI-assisted fraud.
The authors suggest a different approach: assess fewer papers, but assess them properly; broaden our definition of impact; and pay much closer attention to suspicious citation practices.
Perhaps the bigger question is this:
Are research integrity problems really just problems with individual researchers, or are they also a predictable consequence of the systems universities have created to measure academic success?
Read the full articlle here: buff.ly/e3qvuzG
I know it’s a work day, but why is the crowd, if you could even call it that, so small for the SA vs Australia test?
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
I was having this same conversation yesterday about how AI will disrupt psychological research:
If I had bet, I'd wager that:
- short opinion/review pieces are going to become very hard to publish (or those journals will be spammed with AI slop)
- collecting interesting, real-world data or field experiments will be increasingly valuable and distinctive
- archival analyses will become popular, but potentially face a glut of submission
- social networking (and social skills) will be increasingly valuable
- grad admissions and job interviews will increasingly sample skills that can't be faked using AI (e.g., chalk talks)
- journals/conferences will face a peer review collapse due to increasing submission
- AI will quickly be integrated into peer-review to prescan every paper for errors, omissions, etc
- faculty will get exhausted from being spammed by AI agents and slop and will disengage from email with strangers
With math essentially being delegated to OpenAI, here's what I predict for economics and the social sciences more generally:
✅The top tier of research will just become better and it will be normal human-led research where AI is used for scale (e.g. conducting qualitative interviews with relevant populations, running behavioral interventions in the field, analyzing massive text data, etc.)
✅ Field experiments will rise in value and generally making "connections" with firms and being able to run stuff (potentially testing AI pipelines) will be in high demand
✅ Research with administrative data will become even more valuable, but the benefits might be concentrated among some prolific authors who are allowed by the government agencies to use local models to analyze the data at scale. PhD students can probably forget about it
✅Economic history will have a very exciting boom and there will be an enormous race and big rewards for digitizing archives as a source to both identify new research strategies and document new descriptive facts.
✅Review and verification systems will become massively improved with AI assistance and it will become standard practice to do a 360 review of the paper + code + data at the *submission* stage.
⚠️Research that in principle can already be almost completely outsourced to the AI (download and analyze public data, run simple survey experiments, write theory models) is in for a big shock. This would be very bad from the perspective of researchers who depend on this "bread and butter" research, but I think this type of work will just be outsourced to public agencies who can answer their own questions without the need for "peer-reviewed" research.
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
Strong piece about the NSW university governance inquiry. The report and its recommendations reveal a state of horrific incompetence in leadership of public universities. The fascinating report shows management and consultants destroying universities:
michaelwest.com.au/universit…,
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
Replying to @HigherEd_UK
One of several problems here is that it is nearly impossible to judge in advance that any genuinely new knowledge will produce any economic or applied benefit. You can only make that judgement when a very similar kind of knowledge has done so. That’s fine if your just seeking to replicate results or produce minor adjustments to established knowledge, but genuinely innovative research work is necessarily a risk in a world where funding allocation rarely takes risks.
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
A forensic takedown of the corruption at University of Wollongong has now been published. michaelwest.com.au/uni-of-wo…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
That we import nearly everything, and manufacture almost nothing is the result of a failed multi-government experiment.
Australia’s prosperity-creating manufacturing sector has been destroyed by blindly deregulated economic policy applied by both major parties.
“Australia cannot build future prosperity on population growth, property and resource extraction alone – it must invest seriously in the scientific capability that drives innovation. “
Australia must have an ambitious research policy to underpin economic transformation pearlsandirritations.com/pos…
The greatest risk to executing a highly automatic, trained motor skill under extreme pressure is thought. Conscious decision making at the time is a recipe for failure. Thinking about who to take penalties & how to take them should be done prior to the game.
Doesn’t lie. Except for his name. Which is actually Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon.
Replying to @News24Aust @SkyNewsAust
Totally correct 👍 Tommy doesn’t lie. It’s his truthful free speech Nine doesn’t like as it hurts their relationship with the commie socialist Labor government
Pretty astonishing figures.
One important question is the extent to which people's votes are swayed by each seat's candidates. And whether that's the same across different segments of the electorate.
A stereotype might be that in rural areas the individual candidates matter more.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
Just reviewed these #Ebola and #Marburg #PPE guidelines, dated 2026. It's shocking for those of us who advocated for better Ebola PPE in 2014. It uses the 1m rule and states "Paradoxically, wearing excessive PPE can increase a person’s risk of infection." Where is the evidence? 1/4 iris.who.int/server/api/core…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
The Federal Courts handed every court transcript to outsourced provider VIQ Solutions. VIQ then publicly boasted their AI was trained in partnership with Australian courts, without a single litigant ever being told or asked for their consent on often intensely private material.
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
After research and teaching are cut, what is left exactly? KTP or something?
UK universities cut jobs, research and teaching amid squeeze in overseas students ft.trib.al/mRzR5kG
I was a student in four different humanist grad programs (long story.) Only one student of all of those cohorts worked 9-5. It worked great for him. The rest of us worked the way most thinkers work: in fits and starts.
Yesterday, I was giving an intro talk to our dept's new PhD students. Technical things aside, my number 1 suggestion has remained the same over the years: Treat your PhD like a job.
- Avoid 1.5h lunch and three tea breaks.
- Avoid gossiping and loitering at work.
- Lab at 9 am and leave at 6 pm. Being productive till 11 pm in the lab is a lie people till themselves when their day starts at 1 PM.
Everything worth doing can be done with high intensity focus during work hours. And having fun in life is the secret to being productive in a marathon.
Unfortunately, the case of @ourANU exposes as myth the notion that corporate appointments are needed to ensure universities are well run.
We need staff and student oversight, and @NTEUnion will stand up for it.
That will need reform of the ANU Act.
smh.com.au/national/universi…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
The government is mortgaging our future by destroying science in the present.
We’re having huge problems as a country yet our investment in research as a % of GDP is at a record low.
We have to turn this around and invest in CSIRO and science more broadly in 🇦🇺.
region.com.au/give-csiro-sta…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
Fat Cat Salaries: They’re supposed to be there for service, not profit, yet most of our federal departmental secretaries get paid between $900K and $1M (twice what their US equivalents get paid). 👇HAVE YOUR SAY👇 before 10 June. 1/2 #auspol remtribunal.gov.au/consultat…
Tom Johnstone BunurongCountry AU EU UK retweeted
It didn’t end there, as it’s revealed Miller is on a “$315,000 contract” with Defence
Shoebridge asks why he wasn’t upfront about the conflict
Miller says it’s “publicly available”
Shoebridge “It’s actually not my job to find out if you have conflicts of interest with Defence”💥





















