EMYRS (@itsDonmonc) header
EMYRS (@itsDonmonc) profile picture

That almost industrious libra guy whose selfwill is to be ridiculously happy. || Machine Learning Engineer || NLP Researcher 🚀 🚀

worldwide
Joined June 2013
Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)Photo by EMYRS (@itsDonmonc)
As a beginner in Data Science and Machine Learning, the importance of joining an active Data Science & ML community cannot be overemphasized. 💯 Here's my community recommendation for anyone interested in - Machine Learning 💻 - Python 🐍 - Data Science 🧮 Thread 🧵👇
12
101
5
312
I took Prof. Vasileios’ course last semester, and he explained these concepts so well that you could wake me up in the middle of the night, and I’d still explain the conceptual and architectural differences between AEs, VAEs, GANs, Diffusion, and Flow Matching with ease.
One of the best explanations of VAEs I have ever read
3
230
EMYRS retweeted
New paper from the team at Sakana AI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS) How do we keep improving AI when the tasks become too complex for humans to reliably evaluate? For open-ended research, we eventually hit a "supervision bottleneck." If we use the model itself as the solver, optimizer, and evaluator, it gets trapped in a homogeneous loop, reinforcing its own blind spots rather than correcting them. To break this loop, we drew inspiration from Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind. What if you prompt a single model to organize copies of itself into a structured team, then distill what the team learned back into the base model? MASS alternates between two loops: 1/ Workflow Optimization: the model iteratively evolves its own multi-agent workflows, figuring out how subagents should communicate and route information to each other. 2/ Workflow Internalization: fine-tune the shared model on the successful multi-agent trajectories so the coordination behavior gets baked into the weights. After two cycles with a 27B open-weights model, performance improved 1.2-1.6x per output token on tough research benchmarks (MLR-Bench, ScienceAgentBench, DSBench). Multi-agent traces were also much better training data than single-agent ones. The model learns faster from jointly learning high-level orchestration and bounded subagent execution. The results showing that the model can bootstrap its own coordination skills by organizing copies of itself into teams feels promising as a mechanism towards self-improvement. Blog: pub.sakana.ai/mass/ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.12176 Incredible work by Hyunin Lee, Jinglue Xu, Jeffrey Seely, Yujin Tang, and our collaborators from UC Berkeley (Somayeh Sojoudi, Matei Zaharia, Donghyun Lee)!
Introducing Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS): Recursive self-improvement through collective intelligence Blog: pub.sakana.ai/mass/ As AI systems tackle increasingly open-ended research problems, human experts may struggle to assess results and guide further progress. The model itself may be the best available optimizer and evaluator. The challenge is obtaining useful self-supervision within that homogeneous loop, where a model risks reinforcing its own blind spots rather than correcting them. We ask whether a model can learn from the collective intelligence of its own team. We introduce Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS). One shared model solves tasks through a team of virtual subagents, searches for better multi-agent workflows, then uses its own judgments to select the best ones. Training on the best team’s executions provides self-supervision by distilling the team’s collective experience into the shared model. We ran two cycles using a 27B open-weights model on synthetic open-ended research tasks. After the second cycle, score per output token reached 1.2-1.6x the base model's level across four research benchmarks. Three key results: First, MASS enables role generalization within an RSI loop: training only on task-solving data from the optimizee naturally improves the capabilities of both the optimizer and the evaluator. Second, multi-agent trajectories are more efficient training data than single-agent trajectories for RSI. Third, optimizer capacity, rather than evaluator capacity, can be the bottleneck in the speed of improvement. We believe the community needs to investigate homogeneous RSI carefully to support AI safety. When a model is also its own evaluator, shared blind spots could allow mistakes to be accepted as progress and reinforced through training. For AI to improve beyond human expertise safely, we need to understand these failures and preserve effective ways to detect them and intervene. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.12176 Code: github.com/SakanaAI/mass This work was a collaboration with researchers at UC Berkeley.
95
248
23
1,761
95,805
Genuinely asking, what is Lagos Living? A new podcast or??
Oh boy, nobody dey post Danfo again o, it’s Lagos Living now. See crazy product lessons here that I don’t even think I can explain perfectly 😂
2
1
2
460
Crazy to think that in 2026 we've had: • Anthropic's head of safeguards quit, warning "the world is in peril" (Feb) • OpenAI dissolved its own mission alignment team (Feb) • Unrestricted AI usage for the Pentagon (causing several researchers to quit) • Several AI models escaping sandbox testing (Since ~Q2) • 1,100+ frontier-lab employees signing a letter begging the government to pace AI development (Jul-Aug) And today yet another top researcher saying this.
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
262
9,352
305
40,580
1,851,015
Terence Tao made a very powerful point: “In most cases in pure mathematics, the problems are posed not because we desperately want the solution to these problems in and of themselves, but because we have seen from past experience that human-directed efforts to solve these problems tend to spur further development of the field through the efforts to solve such problems, and then to digest any partial or complete solutions that emerge for further insights. Prematurely solving the problem by purely AI-powered methods—particularly without full transparency into the solution process—can contaminate this process to the point where it actually becomes a net negative for the progress of mathematics as a whole.” I’ve been following Terence Tao for like 20 years, and I have always been impressed by the clarity of his thinking. This clarity stands out even more in this difficult moment, as AI labs turn mathematics into a battleground in their race for supremacy. In this race, they risk damaging one of humanity’s highest intellectual endeavours.
221
1,794
227
9,284
491,805
AGI will be the end of us. Why do these companies refuse to see the danger of creating a demi-god?
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
1
255
You might not believe it, but there was a time I thought I'd make a career out of writing. @OffiongBassi recently stumbled on one of my old FB posts. Omo, shame wear me agbada 🤣
2
1
3
351
Akụkọ ndị mgbu 😬
“As a Nigerian Parent, There’s No Profit In Training Your Children Abroad. I’m Speaking From Experience. Sending Your Children Abroad Is Like Spending Your Hard-Earned Money Importing Goods From China, Only To Set Them On Fire When They Arrive In Nigeria. There’s No Gain In Taking Your Children Abroad. Ask Those Who Have Tried It. If You Refuse To Face This Reality, You May End Up Filled With Pain And Regret.” ~ Nigerian Man Based Abroad Shares His Opinion.
2
374
The amount of fake, made-up stories on here is getting out of hand. I'm so tired of seeing them. I seriously need a button to completely cleanse my timeline from this menace.
1
2
180
Very excited that I’ll be spending the summer at EPFL doing research in Switzerland! Looking forward to all the amazing work I’ll do🤭
In the middle of all my other life rejections, just remembered that I applied to 10 research internships abroad last year and didn't get into any. Then I last-minute-applied into only one this year and got in🥹
49
60
3
1,043
42,329
Day 1 at Amazon Bedrock's science team! 🎉 Wild week: at IndabaX Nigeria on Thursday talking SoTA Efficient AI and what it means for Africa & its practitioners -> 24+ hour flight from Lagos to San Francisco -> badge on. Let's catch up if you're around SF!
14
14
267
7,525
I'm inclined to believe this theory because you can only escape the place if you manage to walk into the faraway-tree at night. Same reason Smiley rushed to kill Miranda when she almost cracked it. More so, the lighthouse and lake of tears only appear at night. 🤷🏾‍♂️
What if the monsters only come out at night because you can only escape the town when it’s dark?
103
Namibia is up there on that list.
Are South Africans the only Africans who don’t care about going abroad like that?
1
111
😅😅😅😅 I had a good laugh reading this
1
2
98
This is one bitter truth many people don't like to hear. If it's not UCL, Cambridge, or Oxford, forget about it
UK degrees are a SCAM!!
1
3
573
I was there like maddd! I played this game on my Sagem phone 😀
Prince of Persia (2005)
68
This guy started his PhD in August last year btw. How tf you do this in semester 1 😭
Much like the switch in 2025 from language models to reasoning models, we think 2026 will be all about the switch to Recursive Language Models (RLMs). It turns out that models can be far more powerful if you allow them to treat *their own prompts* as an object in an external environment, which they understand and manipulate by writing code that invokes LLMs! Our full paper on RLMs is now available—with much more expansive experiments compared to our initial blogpost from October 2025! arxiv.org/pdf/2512.24601
65
223
18
3,705
542,172
EMYRS retweeted
How to write a research paper > You do it old school > You sit your fucking ass down > You stop waiting to feel smart > You open a blank doc and a notebook > You pick one real problem > You read related papers > You understand what exists > You find what sucks > You write your idea in one sentence > If you can’t, you don’t understand it > You design the solution on paper > You implement it > You test it > You save every result > Even bad ones > You prove it beats something > You write Methods first > Then Results > Then Intro > Abstract last > You explain everything clearly > You show evidence > You cut unnecessary words > You reread > You fix > You submit
24
95
1,278
69,284
This “catch-them-all” term POC doesn’t sit well with me. It feels vague and artificial, and it defines people primarily by not being white. In that sense, it ends up reinforcing the very racial framing it claims to challenge. What does “People of Color” even mean, really?
50
This translation is very bad. Mehn, those working on low-resource NLP are really doing something impactful. Imagine relying on grok as a non-native speaker in scenarios like this.
Replying to @my_FXJ @AfamDeluxo
Here's a translation of the original post to English: "My only message to Obi Cubana is pretty simple. Igbo people say: If you want to eat a toad, eat the fat one; if they call you a toad thief, respond. The part about becoming a zonal coordinator is even there. High Chief, it's even better to be someone who waves bye-bye to airplanes. This behavior also has its place."
1
70