i am baffled by people who watched you can see everything and came away convinced that nathan fielder fell in love with elizabeth holmes?? the final shot is less of a grand reveal of previously concealed intimacy, and more of a joke at our expense! it’s a wink at how easily audiences can be manipulated into creating narratives from selectively presented evidence. his disclosure that he’d recently gone thru a breakup, the question posed to him in the last minutes of the movie … who chose for those things to be included? people are missing the meta point behind those editorial choices — that people should question nathan’s reliability as a narrator, *including* potentially contrived intimate or romantic dynamics.