@jcrabtree

Maths should make sense. I help you Maths Different & Feel Better! Go from maths fear to maths clarity with REAL ZERO FEAR MATHS.

Melbourne & India
Joined January 2008
🇮🇳 Have you shared this video yet?⌛️❤️🔂
🇬🇧 MURDERED 🇮🇳 INDIA'S ZERO (full documentary with evidence)
1
44
1
103
1,301
🇮🇳 WHAT IS ➡️ 6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) = 🤔 VOTE IN NEXT POST BELOW 🗳️
1
29
6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) = ? 🙏100 Votes Needed 🎦
0%1
100%9
1 votes • 6 days
8
Jonathan J Crabtree's REAL ZERO FEAR MATHS retweeted
FYI @PMOIndia @narendramodi Ji. क्या आपने विकास पर ही अपना ध्यान केंद्रित करके देशभक्त राष्ट्रवादी पीढ़ी बनाने का अवसर गंवा दिया है?
"If Brahmagupta's principles had guided Indian mathematics education since 2014, the country's children might be far happier and more successful today. As an Australian, it is surprising to see the Narendra Modi administration allow the NCERT to continue teaching a flawed, British Raj-era curriculum over India's own superior mathematical foundations. Brahmagupta’s symmetric Sanskrit sūtras align perfectly with modern science, proving that negative, zero, and positive quantities are the fundamental building blocks of our universe." Jonathan J. Crabtree Melbourne Australia
1
1
1
29
🙏British 🇬🇧 Hid Why 0⁰ = 1 From India 🇮🇳❤️🔂 + crediting Elements to Euclid is not proven⏲️6:26
2
13
32
512
"If Brahmagupta's principles had guided Indian mathematics education since 2014, the country's children might be far happier and more successful today. As an Australian, it is surprising to see the Narendra Modi administration allow the NCERT to continue teaching a flawed, British Raj-era curriculum over India's own superior mathematical foundations. Brahmagupta’s symmetric Sanskrit sūtras align perfectly with modern science, proving that negative, zero, and positive quantities are the fundamental building blocks of our universe." Jonathan J. Crabtree Melbourne Australia
8
63
4
178
4,444
📨🙏Dear Shri Narendra Modi 🇮🇳🔂
"If Brahmagupta's principles had guided Indian mathematics education since 2014, the country's children might be far happier and more successful today. As an Australian, it is surprising to see the Narendra Modi administration allow the NCERT to continue teaching a flawed, British Raj-era curriculum over India's own superior mathematical foundations. Brahmagupta’s symmetric Sanskrit sūtras align perfectly with modern science, proving that negative, zero, and positive quantities are the fundamental building blocks of our universe." Jonathan J. Crabtree Melbourne Australia
5
80
291
2,334
🇮🇳 Bhāskara II (1150 CE) left us this classic bee puzzle from ancient India. 1/5 of a hive flew to the Kadamba flower 1/3 flew to the Silandhara 3 times the difference of those two groups flew to an arbor 1 bee kept flying around, drawn by the Keteki & Malati How many bees were in the hive? 🐝 .../2 ⬇️
🤖 Made with AI
1
44
1
128
1,691
Let x = total bees. Then: x = x/5 + x/3 + 3(x/3 – x/5) + 1 The “difference of the two numbers” is the key step that makes the puzzle click. Once you write it this way, the rest is just careful fraction work, no fear required.
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
12
176
Solving the equation step by step: x = x/5 + x/3 + 6x/15 + 1 15x = 5x + 3x + 6x + 15 15x = 14x + 15 x = 15 The hive had 15 bees. (3 to Kadamba, 5 to Silandhara, 6 to the arbor, + 1 remaining.) 🇮🇳🙏♥️🎦 Simply follow @jcrabtree for Real Zero Fear Maths
🤖 Made with AI
2
15
136
Jonathan J Crabtree's REAL ZERO FEAR MATHS retweeted
If Euclid Was a Myth, What Else Did They Steal?Everything you were taught about the history of geometry is a myth. We are told Euclid wrote the Elements. Yet there is ZERO primary evidence he ever existed. Here is the inconvenient truth: 🧵👇
2
42
2
110
39,244
🙏🇮🇳 India's Trairāśika Maths The classical way of thinking about multiplication says: In A × B = C, as 1 is to B, so A is to C In symbols: 1 : B :: A : C and A . B = C . 1 This is the powerful rule of three called trairāśika in the Bharatiya tradition. It means the product is whatever you get by scaling the multiplicand the same way the unit 1 scales to the multiplier. It is not a method for constructing the product from simpler operations. It is simply what follows once you have a multiplicative identity. As soon as C = A . B, the proportion holds automatically because of the identity element. This view works in any monoid, including the multiplicative structure of every unital ring and every group. It only needs a two-sided identity. It does not require commutativity, distributivity, or inverses. By contrast, the repeated addition model of multiplication the 🇬🇧 British forced in us, only works cleanly for positive integers. It breaks as soon as you meet negatives and zero. That is why the proportional characterization is more robust, and why it fits naturally with the historical Indian approach (including Brahmagupta) that systematically handled zero and negatives. Once a multiplicative unit exists, the proportion continues to characterize the product without collapsing.
Replying to @jcrabtree
Does Brahmaguptā's multiplication definition stand true for algebraic structures like groups and rings? The "repeated addition" definition definitely breaks.
22
2
80
1,066
Jonathan J Crabtree's REAL ZERO FEAR MATHS retweeted
My Controversial Conclusion? A Greek geometry text called the Elements existed by the mid-3rd century BCE (during the era of Ashoka). The identity of its original author or compiler remains uncertain, as the surviving biographical sources supply no solid primary evidence. If the West built its mathematical history with a mythical name, what else did they reconstruct (or steal)? What do you think? Was Euclid a real man, or an invented brand name to sell you a story?
1
3
9
184
🇬🇧 MURDERED 🇮🇳 INDIA'S ZERO (full documentary with evidence)
19
251
8
804
29,395
No evidence for Euclid... ⬇️♥️🔂🙏
If Euclid Was a Myth, What Else Did They Steal?Everything you were taught about the history of geometry is a myth. We are told Euclid wrote the Elements. Yet there is ZERO primary evidence he ever existed. Here is the inconvenient truth: 🧵👇
4
12
781