Imagine if there is a social media protocol, instead of a social media platform. Imagine if you could send, Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays npub1pq3nweafwtwelmzmz2s9w0uafd68jm803m959r9wfghkhqdky3ys9feyc5

I've been thinking... Highly skilled and very experienced coders who never really enjoyed the typing part of programming are the ones that are going to thrive in this AI-agentic future.

Muse now available is SG ... wonder how well it understands Singlish.

More stations. 20 Singapore based stations. driftradio.space

Seems that AI token is more valuable then crypto tokens now.

IRC inspired, but not exactly IRC 😁

Hear me out ... the folks that made the Rurouni Kenshin live action movies should make Samurai Champloo live action.

Yesterday I added 59 new stations mostly from Malaysia. Never thought there were so many station still broadcasts in SHOUTcast / Icecast driftradio.space

Lately, I’ve been thinking about what does “source of truth” in a coding project means to me. Is code the source of truth? I don’t think so. Code only tells what is implemented. It does not tell you what should be implemented. Intent is the missing layer, and intent is the source of truth. Tests used to be the place where I codify my intentions. I should do this, it should not do that. When I change something and if an unexpected test fails, it gives me a signal to either reevaluate the intentions or the change I’ve made. AI coding agent breaks this friction. When a test fails, the agent often edits the test to get the pipeline green. The intent-encoding layer gets silently rewritten. I can try to restore the signal directly by telling the agents not to modify existing tests, but this would just slow things down. Lately, I’ve been keeping a Karpathy-style LLM wiki inside the codebase itself. Committed and version-controlled. This is where I write intentions and decisions made in natural language. “Feature should not do this, it should only do that, so it aligns with this-and-that.” When I have my agents review the changes it made, I ask it to check with this wiki notes. If the changes go against something that was decided, I tell it to highlight it to me. I’ll decide to either change the notes or fix the changes. Sometimes a decision was made while in planning mode with the coding agent, I just tell it to update or add a new note to the wiki folder about what we decided. You can say that this sounds like a PRD document. But it is more organic and fluid as it grows and evolves as the product grows and evolves. In fact, if you have a PRD, that should be the source of truth, and it should sit very close, preferably next to the code itself, and AI agents making changes should check against it. I know documentation can drift, especially when humans are maintaining it. You push an emergency update one time on a late night and forget to update the docs. It becomes stale. AI agents are actually better software engineers than us humans, in the sense that they are better at keeping docs updated. Tests were always an imperfect proxy for intent, and code only shows what was built. So wherever you keep the intent, it must be co-located, versioned, and readable by AI agents.

Do not let influencers influence you

This is like that beer app on the first iPhone that has the app store all over again.

AI does not make us mediocre. We were already mediocre. AI does not make us stop thinking. We had already stopped thinking. We were already parroting whatever we saw, whatever the algorithm put in front of us. I agree that we need to find our own voice, but it is not AI that is stopping us from having our own voice, we just never bothered to find our own voice.

Slop is eating the world.

lets see if they can do this with out KYC.

This. I don’t understand why people say we are thinking less when we use AI. I used AI at work all the time, I find it mentally exhausting.

"natural gas" tu gas oksigen ke?

I thought it was just me who for these emails. Right. 2FA everything!

Don't listen to so-called influencers. Just try the model yourself.