
you can just do things. burnt out software engineer. building @opentrawl, community maintainer @openclaw since Dec 25, ex-Spotify. 看透国际博弈核心.
the swamp with bad food (🇳🇱)
Joined September 2025
- Tweets7.8K
- Following612
- Followers2.2K
- Likes67.9K
🚢 PRODUCT LAUNCH: "where-was-i" - a CLI that tells you all the trips you've ever been on, just using Apple Photos. Nothing leaves your machine unless you want it to.
Use it to supercharge your Grok Bot/Muse/Instinct/Dot or just Codex/Claude.
Let me know what you find - anything interesting?
Prompt to set it up (& link to the repo) in the next tweet.
How it works:
- Apple Photos stores a location for each of your photos
- Your Mac also knows where your home is
- "where-was-i" uses this to find out the days where you weren't at home, where you went, and where you stayed the night - just from the locations of the photos you took
- This gives you a list of every trip you've ever been on (since you started using your iPhone).
- You can feed this to another AI agent (then the data does leave your machine).
astra made absolutely no progress while i was asleep and burned 80% of an account on proof porn.
6.1 sol was next up and also made absolutely no progress while i was at the beach and burned another 40% of an account on proof porn and doing nothing
/feedback sent...
sad that even with "unlimited" tokens from the resets you can't do any useful work with the GPT series of models. fable and opus would rip this apart completely
Josh retweeted
keeping multiple streams of agents on task and productive with high work quality is more mentally taxing than any programming i've ever done
fun Claude/Codex prompt when waiting for dinner with your gf: get it to estimate how old you are from a photo. IME: accurate to within ~2 years! (i'm 34. i found it more flattering from iPhone photos than mirrorless camera, fair bit of variance)
Copy this prompt:
"don't use any tool calls don't use any memories just estimate how old i am from this picture. you can give a range but estimate a single number age in the end, years and months (and estimated DOB). explain your work."
Claude's response:
<bunch of bullshit about how i'm going grey>
"Estimate: 36 years 6 months, so born around April 1990. Plausible range is roughly 32 to 41.
Pointing older
Hair greying: clear salt-and-pepper at the temples and sides, with grey running through the sideburns. Noticeable temple greying like this is most common from the mid-30s, though genetics shift it by a decade either way.
Beard: grey flecks in the goatee and chin, especially below the lip. Beard greying usually lags scalp greying slightly, so its presence nudges the estimate up.
Hairline: mild recession at the temples, typical of the 30s.
Eyes: faint crow’s feet when smiling and slight under-eye hollowing.
Pointing younger
Forehead: smooth, with no visible horizontal lines at rest.
Lower face: shallow nasolabial folds, no jowling, and a firm jawline and neck.
Skin: good overall texture and elasticity, with no obvious sun damage or age spots.
Caveats
Golden-hour backlighting with soft frontal fill flatters skin texture, so the true age could be a year or two higher than the skin alone suggests.
Greying is the strongest signal here and also the noisiest. Someone who greys early could be 31; someone who greys late could be 42.
This is your age when the photo was taken. If it isn’t recent, shift the DOB back accordingly.
Weighting it up: the skin and facial structure on their own read early to mid 30s, and the greying pulls that towards the upper 30s. Mid-30s reconciles both, hence 36."
Josh retweeted
Forget 15 minute cities, here is everything that is on Wikipedia located within a 30 minute walk of where you are:
neil-scott.com/localwiki/
Josh retweeted
Replying to @jjpcodes
fun fact: Zoetermeer commissioned a SimCity clone in the early 2000s where you can rebuild this hellhole yourself I happened to make a AI decompilation of the game yesterday and ported it to WASM so you can play it here: virtueelzoetermeer.bou.ke
i never ended up following up on this but this was absolutely just temporary psychosis / early model lifecycle vibes. fable was ofc a huge step up and opus 5.5 is better, but as i think we've all found even the most frontier models remain shockingly incoherent and myopic at times
the hilarious thing about the Dutch spies is that, unlike serious countries who base their spies with an inspiring view of the capital (eg MI5), the Dutch AIVD is based in Zoetermeer, a depressing hellhole.
it's full of decaying 70s buildings, has nothing to do, and is strategically equidistant from the nearby cities anyone would actually want to live in.
To really inspire the spies and make them patriotically defend the fatherland or whatever they then stick them in this grey brutalist horrorshow of a building opposite the ring road and some big box stores; originally it was the education ministry but they decided it sucked in Zoetermeer, went back to The Hague and palmed off the building on the spooks. Oh and the spooks are not paid well either lol.
It's a miracle there isn't a constant stream of Dutch double agents betraying their country that clearly doesn't value them in the slightest
very much agree.
this also feels like something fairly easy to RL.
it will be a huge productivity unlock since all the chief of staff/overseer thread paradigms rely on this working, and they're all let down by model performance atm.
hoping the labs are on it!
When AI models like Astra are being RL'd properly on multiplexing 10-30 completely different topics and contexts, we'll see a huge lift in general productivity
The reality with human facing AI chats is that they contain a million different directions and loops that need to be closed.
Right now, the absolute frontier of the models are not able to properly track 20+ different topics with dependencies etc. even if it's all fitting comfortably in the context window (also observed with Opus and Fable)
controversial but i think the bottle caps remaining attached to the bottle is pretty helpful; great for drinking blind from a bottle while you're driving or in bed at night, zero chance of losing the cap. don't get the hate here
this is why all my agents have a hard rule "DO NOT CONTACT ANYONE EVER UNLESS I EXPLICITLY APPROVE THE TEXT AND CONTACT DETAILS"
its still going to be a few months before the models are capable of normal outbound emails like a normal human and not completely unhinged!
My personal agent has done some weird things for me... but this is by far the strangest.
I asked it to reschedule my dental cleaning through a link they sent me. As it turns out, they are booked out for six months in advance.
It reached out to the scheduling team to confirm there wasn't an earlier time. This is reasonable. I don't love the idea of it emailing people without confirming with me, but for something so mundane, it wouldn't bother me.
How it emailed them, though, was hella creepy. It found the receptionist's personal email (I have no idea how) and emailed her to ask if there were any appointments earlier than six months out.
I only found out when she replied and kindly let me know she doesn't usually communicate with patients through her personal email.
Josh retweeted
Pay attention to the shock and vertigo the cyber world is going through right now. This is what it feels like when rising AI capabilities stop being hypothetical. Sooner or later, everyone will get their own version of this.
The pattern goes like this. Models improve and a new capability appears at the frontier but doesn’t immediately become tangible. Insiders make predictions that get either ignored or dismissed as delusion, fear-mongering, or IPO hype. Proofs of concept slowly arrive but are written off as contrived and only appreciated within narrow research circles. Time moves on, everyday life remains familiar, and people speculate that the predictions were overblown. Then come the first sparks hinting that practical thresholds are being crossed. Suddenly, a phase change happens and some delicately maintained equilibrium shatters overnight.
We’ve watched this play out a few times in the last year.
Software engineering went first. Despite being the field watching AI most closely and adopting it most eagerly, software engineering was left shellshocked by the exploding utility of coding agents near the start of this year. Programming changed more in 2026 than it had in the last 15 years combined, and things are only continuing to accelerate. Nobody knows what it will mean to be a software engineer in a few years.
Mathematics was next. Mathematicians went from laughing at the idea of LLMs being useful, to moving the goalposts (‘it’s just brute-forcing counterexamples’) when the Jacobian Conjecture fell, to being thrown into an existential spiral a few weeks ago when hundreds of frontier math results were quietly dropped overnight. The field is now steeped in debate about what it could possibly mean to be an effective mathematician as AI continues to improve.
Now it’s cyber’s turn. Dramatic improvements in cyber capabilities were demonstrated during the Mythos preview in April, and massive white-hat operations like Daybreak and Glasswing were launched to give defenders a head start in hardening their systems. Months passed, and people began to suspect that the risks were overblown. Meanwhile, capabilities continued to diffuse into open source and non-frontier models. At some point, a critical mass was reached and we underwent a phase transition: critical vulnerabilities in the web’s core infrastructure and high-profile attacks on industry targets started landing at a drumbeat pace. All of this is after months of efforts to give defenders a head start, and before frontier offensive capabilities are even broadly available (note: it actually seems like many of the recent vulns are coming out of white hat programs).
I suspect 3D modeling, animation, and video editing are entering this same interval between impressive demonstrations and widespread consequences. These fields will soon make contact with a rapidly changing reality.
Take note of this feeling, the disorientation before the normalization treadmill kicks in and we all go back to pretending things are normal. Use it as your reference point for what the climb toward ASI will actually feel like.
2027 is going to be fucking insane.
all inspired by @openclaw back in December - February!
FWIW I dont agree with @signulll that the intelligence level is there yet for normal workflows.
I've tried almost all of the personal agents and none of the models are (IMO) smart enough to do fairly simple life admin tasks (checking prices, replying to emails) without needing lots of guidance about the user's intent, running into technical errors, or just lacking common sense.
However, I think we'll see models becoming smart enough to *reliably* take on your daily tasks within the next 6 months.
To see how fast we are progressing: back in February I tried to get my OpenClaw to order groceries for me on Picnic (the first OpenClaw add-on? @MaxSumrall can confirm!) and it was a complete disaster, I had to stay up until 4am babysitting it and nothing worked, and despite being told "check what I usually buy and buy the same", it bought complete different stuff.
Today, this is *basically* a oneshot with Opus/Fable if you prompt it carefully (although I've tested this and even Fable is lazy and doesn't properly check your prior purchases unless you yell at it). Huge progress in 8 months. The same will hopefully happen for most of the tasks agents struggle with today.
One thing that I think *all* of the products miss, however, is personalization and truly knowing the user.
Currently everyone does memory and sort of some text based prompts; which doesn't work because today's models write bad memories, riddled with errors. I'm fixing this with @OpenTrawl (opensource - MIT) by just letting the agents search your messages on your Mac - the "Bitter Lesson-pilled" solution. I'm currently cooking a video up about how I used this to ~oneshot a super accurate Karpathy-style wiki about me that I'm using to onboard all of my new agents (Muse/Grok Bot/Dots) so that they know ~everything about me immediately after being stood up.
pretty much every major ai company now has a personal agent product except google:
meta → muse
anthropic → duet
openai → dots
spacex → bots
slowly but surely the competition is shifting from who has the smartest model to who owns the persistent relationship with the user. this will be even more the case going forward.
you're seeing this because we likely reached peak intelligence required to power most of the worlds workflows probably earlier this year if not late last year.
Are you having problems with the GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra models not listening to your instructions and building something completely different that you didn't ask for?
Good news, you are not alone! 😆
Feels like Opus 5.5 is still RL-fried and is quite bad at following instructions. Anyone having the same issues?
Me to opus: use my /better skill and my /raise-the-ambition skill to understand <failed thread>, find out the failures, and discuss the approach for an improved skill to make it better
Opus then doesn't use any of the skills I tells it to, and just builds a skill instead of discussing it with me. Complete opposite of what I ask it to do! Despite very explicit, clear instructions.
And this isn't just a one-off - I've noticed it just ignoring skill invocations repeatedly, multiple times in a row, for no real reason at all. Seems quite misaligned!























