jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly) header
jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly) profile picture

Co-Founder of Akkio.

Cambridge, MA
Joined April 2009
Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)Photo by jonreilly.eth (@jonathonreilly)
jonreilly.eth retweeted
Replying to @IAI_TV
The universe is integer in units of Planck cubes
1,136
380
210
5,292
1,256,435
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK — Rangers arrested a 34-year-old man Saturday after he spent nearly two hours in a homemade bison costume chasing tourists while yelling, “NOW YOU KNOW HOW IT FEELS!” Several visitors briefly thought it was real until they spotted a “Made in China” tag on the tail.
210
301
152
2,295
1,702,882
This actually.
The story of AI in the next few years is going to be compute: an essay on the future of AI. K3 in 2 days is already #10 on OpenRouter with ~140B tok/day, and it’s infra is crumbling. Throughput is down from 30tok/s to 13tok/s, E2E latency is up to 72s and time to first token is >20s! It would cost a minimum of $500k to buy the 8 B300s it would take to serve even quantized Kimi K3 and ~$4M for the more recommended GB300 NVL72 rack. I don’t think Moonshot has the compute available to scale to their demand! In fact, even the US based inference providers will likely not be able to scale capacity as much as they’d like even if they were to host it: a 2.8T model is no joke. GPU providers (neoclouds etc) are doing 3yr and I recently hear 5yr commits with an ungodly 30% down, and customers are chomping it up. Prices continue to go to the moon. The two big labs, hyperscaler clouds, Grok and Meta have compute deals locked in prior, and the rest are fighting for scraps. Tier 1 neoclouds (coreweave/nebius etc) are rumored to not even small “smaller” customers. Meta is the biggest wildcard here. With ~7GW of compute by eoy 2026 and no clear big model ties, they either get to frontier on their own or can host the most Kimi K3 capacity (unless they sell it to the labs). Even though the price of models has fallen over time, it’s worth noting that the price of frontier has not. 3yrs ago, GPT-4 released at $60/M, o1 at $60/M, Opus 4 at $75/M, GPT5 at $10/M, Fable at $50/M and now Sol at $30/M and K3 at $15/M. Even if you consider K3 frontier, that’s only a 4-5x flux in 3yrs. In that time, frontier demand has increased at least 3+ ooms and frontier intelligence performance has gone 32x at least by task time by METR. Essentially, so long as a) the demand for frontier intelligence continues to grow to near infinity, b) the frontier continues to grow in performance, even as c) if the price of frontier declines a little, the value accrued to frontier grows significantly! And there’s a tremendous bull case for those who have locked up compute if you’re bitter lesson pilled and believe larger models will always be smarter models.
1
83
“and that this fine steed of AI gallops with both speed and stability”
Xi Jinping AI speech transcript: Distinguished colleagues and guests, ladies and gentlemen, friends, 70 years ago, a group of young scholars proposed the concept of artificial intelligence for the first time at the Dartmouth workshop in New Hampshire of the United States. In the subsequent 70 years, AI scientists and researchers from around the world ventured into this unknown territory, forged ahead through twists and turns, and made breakthroughs with persistent hard work. Seven decades later today, amid the new wave of AI development, we are gathering by the Huangpu River to discuss how to promote AI globally for the positive, for good, and for humanity. All this makes our meeting highly important. On behalf of the Chinese government and people, I would like to extend a warm welcome to you all. In the course of history, the invention of the steam engine heralded the industrial civilization. The widespread access to electricity brightened up modern society and the birth of the internet brought the entire world together. Each of these technological revolutions has profoundly reshaped our way of work and life and enabled a giant leap in economic and social development. Today, major changes unseen in a century are accelerating across the world. The new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation is advancing at a faster pace. And the world has entered an unprecedented period of active innovation on AI technologies. Intelligent connectivity, human machine collaboration, cross-sector integration, joint creation and sharing and other intelligent technologies are unleashing enormous power. All this carries within it great opportunities as well as challenges to governance. We human beings must answer the questions posed by our times. How to get along with thinking machines? How to ensure security when algorithms are part of decision making? How to tackle ethical challenges by technologies through adaptive governance. How to realize AI for all when the divide keeps widening? These questions demand serious consideration and real answers from the whole international community. In China's view, all countries should take a people-centered approach and develop AI for the positive and for good. We should ensure that AI is an important driver for shared prosperity and common security. We should join hands to build a just and equitable system for global AI governance. To this end, I wish to share four observations. First, we should adhere to the principle of openness and win-win and boost innovation-driven development as a new engine of world economic growth and an accelerator for the shift of growth drivers. AI is moving from the digital world into the physical world. We should seize this rare historic opportunity to encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing. We should facilitate technological innovation, industrial development and scenario-based application of AI. We should make coordinated advances in the transformation and upgrade of traditional industries, the cultivation and growth of emerging industries, and forward-looking planning for future industries so that all sectors and businesses can benefit from AI. Second, we should strengthen risk awareness and ensure that AI is secure and controllable. AI should be a trusted tool for humanity. We should take seriously the various types of inherent and secondary risks that AI may trigger. We should put in place laws and regulations, technological monitoring, early warning and emergency response systems in order to strengthen the line of security, prevent abuses and malicious use and ensure that AI is always under human control. In the meantime, we should jointly oppose overstretching the national security concept in the field of AI or placing one country's security over that of others. Third, we should encourage inclusiveness and promote mutual learning between civilizations. AI development and its application should not erode or undermine the diversity of world civilizations or the uniqueness of cultures of different countries. We must shape the values of AI with humanity's common values and make good use of AI technologies to increase understanding, tolerance, exchanges, and sharing among all civilizations. We should tend to the garden of civilizations with great care to ensure that the beauty of each civilization is appreciated and shared. Fourth, we should advocate solidarity and improve global governance. AI is an invaluable asset that encapsulates humanity's collective wisdom. We should practice true multilateralism and recognize the important role of the United Nations. We should enhance alignment and coordination on AI development strategies, governance rules and technical standards so as to form a consensus based global governance framework at an early date to make this frontier technology better benefit humanity. We must carry out extensive international cooperation and help global south countries with capacity building to bridge the AI and digital divides, promote sustainable development and prevent creating new historical injustice in AI. Ladies and gentlemen, friends, This year marks the start of China's 15th 5-year plan. It maps out China's economic and social development for the next five years and provides immense opportunities for the international community. In recent years, China has embraced AI with open arms. We have promoted interplay between an efficient market and a well functioning government, strengthened AI innovation, actively advanced the AI plus initiative and built a healthy ecosystem for all entities to thrive in together. The core smart economy industries are worth at least 1 trillion RMB yuan. Smart devices in countless homes truly improve people's livelihood. Intelligent manufacturing in China has become another shining hallmark of Chinese modernization. At the same time, China lays great emphasis on safety and security in AI development with a deep understanding of the trends and logic of AI development. We are continuously improving laws, regulations, policies, mechanisms, application norms as well as ethical principles to make sure that AI is safe, secure, and controllable, and that this fine steed of AI gallops with both speed and stability. As a responsible major country, China is always committed to providing international public goods relating to AI. Since I proposed the global AI governance initiative, China has promoted the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution on enhancing international cooperation on capacity building of artificial intelligence by consensus. Published the AI capacity building action plan for good and for all. Announced the AI plus international cooperation initiative and advocated for establishing the world artificial intelligence cooperation organization, or WAICO. China has been contributing steadily to the global AI governance. We often say in China, a single string cannot make music and a single tree does not make a forest. AI development should not be a solo performance by a single country but a symphony of international cooperation. Thanks to our joint efforts, WAICO has come into being in Shanghai. Our vision from one year ago is now a reality. This is a major move by China to answer the call of the global south and unite the international community together to promote vigorously AI development and governance. It will be an important milestone in the history of AI development to further support global AI development and to advance global AI capacity building. I hereby announce that in the next five years, China will provide developing countries with 5,000 opportunities in AI training and seminar programs. China will develop international AI application cooperation centers with ASEAN, the League of Arab States, the African Union, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS. And we will enable 30 countries to use the AI-powered meteorological warning system, Mazu, to safeguard homes around the world. Ladies and gentlemen, friends, As ancient Chinese observed, a man of wisdom adapts to changes. A man of knowledge acts by circumstances. With AI advancing at a staggering speed, we must ensure its development is for the positive, for good, and for humanity. We must make its oversight and governance precise and effective and constantly refine measures to forestall loss of control. We should always guide AI development with human wisdom and international consensus so that AI can truly become a mighty force that increases the well-being of humanity and advances human civilization. China is ready to be more open, take more practical actions and assume a more visionary perspective. We are ready to work with all parties to seize the opportunities of AI development and meet the challenges and join hands to create a brighter future for humanity. Thank you.
62
jonreilly.eth retweeted
If one company summons a superintelligent machine god, they will control the universe for all time. If five companies summon a superintelligent machine god, they will have negative margins.
Zuck: “The pricing from some of the other labs is very extreme and has very high margins. We think that there’s a real ability to be able to offer frontier or very high-level intelligence at a much more affordable cost.” Epic pricing war breaking out among agentic models.
46
138
14
3,938
152,476
jonreilly.eth retweeted
what the hell is "§" and why does Fable like it so much?
245
29
44
2,761
708,198
Saw a notice about a nationwide penny shortage at Dunkin this morning. Looked it up and pre-1982 pennies are worth 4x face for the CU content. Illegal to melt them down - but bulk buyers are paying 2x face. It’s a bet that the penny is discontinued (so they are buying copper at 1/2 off). Interesting arbitrage.
1
1
53
Post 1982 pennies are 97.5% zinc and the full metal value sits at around 90% off face value.
1
12
jonreilly.eth retweeted
i'm a cypherpunk, and have been running nodes since 1990s. exit remailers, tor, file sharing, bitcoin nodes. p2p networks don't exist unless people with mettle run nodes. filter bippers are weak leeches, scared to p2p, demanding to censor to make nodes "safe" for the weak to run.
233
265
39
2,757
151,988
jonreilly.eth retweeted
Today, I’m thrilled to share that @asymptotelabs' open-source project, Agent Beacon, has been exclusively featured by Help Net Security, a top cybersecurity news publication. Check out the article here: helpnetsecurity.com/2026/06/… Agent Beacon gives security and IT teams a unified record of AI agent activity across local, CI, and cloud environments. Teams can deploy Beacon in one click through MDM and stream telemetry directly into their SIEMs. We’re grateful to see our open-source work recognized by the community. We’re just getting started, and we’re excited to help define the industry standards for AI agent visibility and governance.
4
4
12
728
Replying to @yacineMTB
That's certainly my experience with coding. Suddenly I can do things that previously I could only have dreamed of. The code is probably horrible, but it does what I want it to do.
3
5
76
4,232
So much for subtlety
17
jonreilly.eth retweeted
Me and codex were busy. 🔊 sonoscli.sh — Sonos 🗃️ wacli.sh — WhatsApp 🪶 birdclaw.sh — X archive 🧰 gitcrawl.sh — GitHub archive 🛰️ discrawl.sh — Discord archive 🎧 spogo.sh — Spotify 💬 imsg.sh — iMessage 🧳 mcporter.sh — MCP to CLI 🗣️ sag.sh — ElevenLabs voice 🧿 askoracle.sh — second opinion Upgrading the 🦞 OpenClaw army.
229
374
62
6,239
539,488
jonreilly.eth retweeted
It’s not about junior vs senior, it’s about “good with AI” vs “not good with AI.”
905
1,898
335
17,563
916,929
.@Sonos should build a Clawdbot for the home. Interact via voice (@elevenlabs?), connect to all music services and home control and intelligently integrate it - actually valuable intelligent home unlocked. It could work with existing hardware.
1
56
They could sell this as a service (I would absolutely subscribe).
31
jonreilly.eth retweeted
1/ I’ve worked with hundreds of VCs and keep running across the same problem: there’s no simple tool to research rounds and competition. So…we built it. The Venture Codex is a better way to do research before investing and before helping your companies fundraise.
22
20
9
250
57,527
jonreilly.eth retweeted
The desired outcome of keeping Bitcoin censorship resistant is shared by all. Just some people are less good at understanding network game theory and untangling critical thinking vs how they would like things to work. bitcoin runs on economic game-theory, not wishful thinking.
178
140
38
1,307
176,583
Replying to @tracewoodgrains
I get the appeal. We are told that improving our biology is "unethical", and we want to defend against this charge, and yet we're also often told it's a cardinal rule of public communications that if you're always "on the defensive" you're guaranteed to lose. And so what better solution than to turn around the table and say that those who reject the new century's modernity are the unethical ones, because they are committing the age-old sin of negligence? But ultimately I now think the strategy has far more downsides than upsides. The idea that differences in preferences and values can often be resolved with "live and let live" is a powerful social technology, and we lose a lot if we abandon it. If you publicly telegraph that if you win your fight for acceptance you will immediately follow it up with a fight for imposition, do not be surprised if people decide to oppose your fight for acceptance from day one with a vigor only reserved for resisting imposition. And so if we want the health gains of much stronger biotech this century to come with less opposition, we must put a stake in the ground and make clear that it will all be voluntary. (BTW yes I bite the bullet. I am okay with not mandating vaccination despite the public health risks of such a policy) I call on @noor_siddiqui_ and all friends of radical biotech to join me in making clear that we support all invasive biotech being strictly voluntary, and that we will find other ways to compensate for the downsides of some people not getting certain things at birth or childhood. Milady.
123
26
25
758
114,032