Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Congrats to first international, multidisciplinary Delphi consensus specifically addressing the management of non-metastatic UTUC led by @ricautor @CleClinicUro
Our paper IMPACT UTUC is now published in @NatRevUrol: an international multidisciplinary Delphi consensus on #UTUC
doi.org/10.1038/s41585-026-0…
@ricautor @RobertoContieri @LauraBukavinaMD @urodocash @PGrivasMDPhD @montypal @sonpavde @AndreaNecchi @jteoh_hk @carme_mir1
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨Correlation v causation🚨
⚠️ Key limitations:
🧪 No pesticide exposure measured — distance from a golf course was the exposure proxy.
⏳ Timing mismatch — residence only 2–3 yrs before PD onset was used, despite PD’s long prodromal period.
📉 Weak dose-response — risk was highest 1–2 miles away, not <1 mile, with no significant distance gradient within 3 miles.
🏠 Differential missing data — 39% of controls vs 6.9% of cases lacked adequate residential history.
📊 Small reference group — only 9 PD cases lived >6 miles from a golf course, producing wide CIs.
This is the study I cited in the interview.
Living within 1 mile of a golf course increased Parkinson’s risk by 126% compared to living over 6 miles away, and the greatest risk (a 198% increase) was observed for those living 1–2 miles from a golf course!
People relying on groundwater near golf courses had nearly double the risk of Parkinson's compared to areas without golf courses.
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
ESMO 2026 finished strong
1000s of abstracts but only a handful may change care. This is our map of the trials that matter most.
Cancer vaccines make a Ph-3 win; T-cell engagers are advancing in solid tumors (sclc); China delivered major readouts; and, ADCs are reshaping treatment.
Breadth of progress here is remarkable.
Not everything was a home run, of course.
Some endpoints remain immature & several results deserve careful scrutiny
❤️ Huge thanks to wonderful oncologists for peer-reviews @BalazsHalmosMD @raffcolo @AbiSivaMD @ChandrakanthMv @GIMedOnc (& others not on X)
Hon. mention AZUR in GI (ran out of grids)
p.s. if your fav study is missing, leave a comment/DM!
- - - - -
Plot Source: @Jori_health
- - - - -
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Six phase III trials. Six different stories.
Higher pCR does not guarantee better survival.
In muscle-invasive bladder cancer, EFS and OS matter more than impressive response rates.
Are we measuring what truly matters to patients?
@myESMO @OncoAlert @OpenMedicineHQ #ESMO26 @tompowles1 @urologysummit @Uromigos @Uroweb @urotoday
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨 What is the role of cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy?
@RayAMC48 @LuisMedinaMD @MatveyTsivian and team explore the contemporary role of single-stoma cutaneous ureterostomy as a urinary diversion option in the urinary diversion armamentarium.
🔗 mdpi.com/1718-7729/33/8/455
@EMW2000 @MatveyTsivian @SES_AUA @UroOnc @SUO_YUO @LuisMedinaMD @RayAMC48
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Fantastic paper led by from
@APCCC_Lugano group about high-risk localized prostate cancer management in @EUplatinum
kwnsfk27.r.eu-west-1.awstrac…
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
It hard to explain why 1 trial with gem/cis +/-PD(L)1 (NIAGARA) is +ve for EFS/OS and 2 very similar trials (presented today) are negative in MIBC. Potentially NIAGARA has the highest risk population, not all respond to IO and the maintenance phase the most effect- but the OS of gem/cis pembro HR of 1 is concerning. This reflects what we saw in metastatic disease with contradictory results for the big combination trials. Overall EVP looks better and more consistent #ESMO26 @myESMO @Annals_Oncology @OncoAlert
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Histologic diversity in #BladderCancer is stage-dependent: rare in pTa (<2%) and pT1 (<5%), but common in MIBC/mUC (~35% variants/divergent). Squamous differentiation dominates (~90% of divergent cases), with basal-like biology and distinct therapeutic targets.
#GUPath #UrothelialCancer
🌶️🌡️Summary of my uropathology for urologists and oncologists series! 👉check it out! and retweet if you like!
@urotoday @OncoAlert @Uroweb @EAUYAUrology @EAU_YAUroTech @EauPatient @niklas_kluemper @onkowissen
teapawt.net/Markuseckstein3/status…
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨 PSMA-guided RT intensification for #ProstateCancer 🚨
@EuropeanUrology
👥 262 randomized (253 treated), 4 strata: salvage post-RP, high-risk, oligomet, salvage post-RT
📊 Phase 2 RCT, SOC RT vs PSMA-PET-guided RT to all detected sites
⏱️ Median f/u 66 mo
⚠️ Primary 5-yr failure-free survival 66% vs 62%, HR 0.80, p=0.14 (not met)
✅ BCFS favored PSMAgRT: 72% vs 65% (sHR 0.70, p=0.048)
✅ High-risk 81% vs 66%; post-RP 80% vs 68% (sHR 0.54, p=0.037)
🎯 Seeing more w/ PSMA doesn't mean treating more helps everyone.
-High-risk & post-RP pts look like the target group
-Pending phase 3 PATRON.
🔗 doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.202…
@AmerUrological @UroOnc @PCFnews @AmarUKishan @UrologyTimes @urotoday @SbrtSean @PCF_Science
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🤖 IA en Urología: coincidir no es acertar.
Asistentes tipo ChatGPT en comités de tumores (UroMDT, Motril, Verona): coinciden con la decisión final en el 56–67% de los casos (kappa 0,44–0,48). Acuerdo moderado, y los desacuerdos se acumulan en los casos complejos. 🧵👇
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🌄 Monday Morning Mention!
✍ BRIEF REPORT: Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Chemotherapy Induces Nectin-4 Downregulation and Enfortumab Vedotin Resistance in Bladder Cancer by Christoph Nössing...Bernhard Englinger et al
💡 Link to full article: buff.ly/altXSPr
👏 Thank you to the authors for trusting EUO to publish your work!
@uroweb
@mroupret
@GPloussard
@jteoh_hk
@Ric_Campi
@CaPsurvivorship
@LauraMarandino
@DaveDandrea
@RenuEapen
@Ecastromarcos
@OncoAlert
@Sciencedirect
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Urinary diversion for severe pelvic radiation injury significantly enhances bowel-related quality of life. Urologists should consider this intervention for patients with debilitating post-radiation complications. tinyurl.com/26to34nz
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
📢 Irradiate the whole pelvis in clinically node-negative high-risk localized prostate cancer yes/no?
New systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluated 5 available phase III randomized trials, including 5,172 patients, comparing whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) versus prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT).
🔹 No overall survival benefit was observed with WPRT: HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.94–1.21).
🔹 The apparent benefit in biochemical/progression-free and metastasis-free survival was largely driven by the POP-RT trial and was no longer evident when this study was excluded.
🔹 WPRT was associated with a modest increase in late grade ≥2 GU/GI toxicity, without a meaningful excess of severe events with modern radiotherapy techniques.
👉 Key message: current randomized evidence does not support routine elective pelvic irradiation for all cN0 high-risk patients.
“Alone we can do so little; together, we can do so much” congratulations to all the team 💪
#ProstateCancer
@josedsh @fcounago @PedrodePablos1
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Apical dissection during radical prostatectomy by Dr. Jochen Walz @ERUSrobotics
1- blunt and cold cut dissection (avoid diathermy)
2- cut DVC, then stitch (stitching DVC before may trap the anterior sphincter)
3- stitch DVC before dissecting urethra for better visualization
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨 Retzius-sparing RARP: better early continence, worse long-term cancer control in the first randomized trial 10-yr readout 🚨
@EurUrolOncol, post hoc analysis of an RCT
👥 120 men, NCCN low/intermediate risk PCa, randomized 1:1 RS vs anterior RARP
⏱️ Median f/u 77 mo, 20 progression events (BCR and/or any additional tx)
✅ 5-yr PFS: 80.2% RS vs 91.1% anterior (p=0.01)
✅ 10-yr PFS: 50.5% vs 82.0%
✅ Adjusted for CAPRA-S: HR 2.64 for progression w/ RS (95% CI 1.01 to 6.91)
⚠️ Signal held in negative-margin pts only: 5-yr 81.1% vs 96.1% (p=0.042), so not just a margin story
⚠️ RS arm had more pT3 (45% vs 23%) and numerically more PSMs (25% vs 13%)
⚠️ Small trial, oncology not the original endpoint, only 9 pts at risk at 10 yr, and the 2 surgeons had done just 60 RS cases total. Expert series suggest ~100 to flatten the learning curve
🎯 First randomized long-term evidence that the oncologic equivalence of RS RARP cannot be assumed.
👉Not a final verdict on RS in high-volume hands
🔗 doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.0…
@AmerUrological @UroOnc @SUO_YUO @PCF_Science @PCFnews @UrologyTimes @urotoday
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨 Exercise improved QoL for patients on ADT for #prostatecancer & it costs less per QALY than most cancer drugs the NHS funds 🚨
🏋️♂️@TheLancetOncol STAMINA trial:
👥 700 men on ADT, median age 71.6, 34% metastatic, 19% on ARPI or chemo
📊 Randomized 5:4 vs an ACTIVE comparator: optimised usual care w/ clinician training and behavioural prompts
💊 12 mo supervised aerobic + resistance exercise in community gyms, dietary advice, behavioural support, free membership
✅ FACT-P +4.5 (p=0.0004), FACT-G +3.7, above the >3 point clinically important threshold
✅ Fatigue (FACIT-F) +1.9 (p=0.0068)
✅ £13,920 to £19,077 per QALY. Median ICER for NICE-approved oncology drugs: £30,000
⚠️ Open label PROs, 97% of pts White, fatigue effect at the edge of MCID, physical outcomes unchanged
⚠️ 3 intervention-related SAEs, all recovered
🎯 This beat an already-enhanced control, in a population including metastatic pts, delivered through community gyms at scale.
👉I think many of us have been telling patients for years to exercise while on ADT to reduce side effects, now we have trial-grade data!
*The figure in this post is not from the paper, based on tabular data!!!
🔗 doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(2…
@AmerUrological @UroOnc @SUO_YUO @PCFnews @urotoday @UrologyTimes @CaPsurvivorship
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
Important change in the 2026 @AmerUrological NMIBC Guidelines: all high-grade Ta tumors are now classified as high-risk.
This reduces a long-standing source of heterogeneity in the intermediate-risk group and should improve risk-appropriate treatment for patients, while creating cleaner, more meaningful populations for clinical trials.
Great to see the evidence translate into practice. @IBCG_BladderCA @UrogerliMD @pjhensley11 @AmirHorowitz @mouwlab @spsutkaMD @shilpaonc @AndreaNecchi @LAUrology_NL @karima_oualla @PGrivasMDPhD @marigfern @SpiessPhilippe @UroCancerMD
Time to revisit something I’ve been saying for years: TaHG bladder cancer is not intermediate risk. The clinical outcomes, molecular biology ... all point in the same direction.
Yet some frameworks allow < 3cm TaHG tumors to be downgraded into “intermediate risk” alongside low-grade disease.
That classification has real consequences for patients:
• undertreatment
• less rigorous surveillance
• in some studies, these patients are even placed on observation as a supposedly appropriate “control arm.”
TaHG is high risk. 🧵 @BladderCancerUS @WorldBladderCan @IBCG_BladderCA
Javier Pérez Ardavín retweeted
🚨 Referring men w/ #ProstateCancer on ADT to a cardiologist lowered cholesterol, not heart attacks 🚨
🖊️@JAMAInternalMed, RADICAL PC-2:
👥 2,487 men w/ PCa starting ADT, 55 sites
📊 RCT: usual care vs routine cardiology/internist referral w/ statin for all
⏱️ Median f/u 5.8 yrs
✅ Cholesterol lower in treatment group
⚠️ CV death, MI, stroke, HF: sHR 1.08 (0.79 to 1.49). No difference
⚠️ The price: ~1,240 new specialist referrals, plus years of f/u visits, to move a lab value a statin script could have moved on day 1
🎯 Advice from this paper, skip the referral, just start the statin🤷
🔗 doi.org/10.1001/jamainternme…
@AmerUrological @UroOnc @SUO_YUO @urotoday @UrologyTimes @PCF_Science @PCFnews @ManuMysore2




















































