Melon retweeted
CHILL has been taken over by @jpegmelon
Shipped initially by @cruelhandeth
Was DMing with Melon on routing issues with FOMO
I am a believer in the RWA/MEME pair when done right (we say that with AI)
NFLX/CHILL is incredible ticker. Buy, Chill, Earn NFLX
We hold the remote
This quoted post is unavailable.
Melon retweeted
has anyone actually reviewed the $AI contract?
LMFAO - i suspect not.
If you got more than 1% of ur net worth in that, cut it.
@ArtificiallyInu
Melon retweeted
the scarcity play is where it gets interesting. curious to see who else catches on to the supply cap dynamics here
Melon retweeted
I keep asking people to confirm or deny this, so here's the actual work.
solana:FDb7vN3hfrV1xYxP6WAeBLuKRP4rtrP3kmVQ4zoqpump is the first token on Robinhood Chain to pay its holders dividends in the tokenized stock it's paired with.
Every v4 pool created up to and including CHILL's launch block was scanned — 104,029 pools, 42,194 of them with a hook. Only three hooks have ever been attached to a tokenized-stock pool:
DopplerHookInitializer — 255 stock pools, from 2026-07-12
0x4e3468951D49f2EEa976eD0D6e75fFCb44a9a544
LiquidHookDynamicFeeV2 — 2 stock pools, from 2026-07-12
0xDee7DcDCf599306D3c29e8dd0E6F4C9c4b6F68Cc
Sentry's stock hook — CHILL, 2026-07-19
0x9Ee578FbFc98C108dFd2e680EbcDb916A373F0cC
Each was tested for one thing: does the stock get transferred INTO the paired token's own contract, which is what funds holder dividends? The first two: zero transfers, ever. Their holders receive nothing in the stock.
CHILL's does. Every trade through the Sentry pool sends 1.00% of the NFLX leg into the contract, claimable by any holder.
6,234 swaps → 6,234 payouts → 65.14 NFLX. One-to-one, verifiable on-chain.
Plenty of tokens were paired with a stock before it. Not one of them ever paid a holder in it.
Oh and also just to say was the first paired with NFLX stock in general on RH chain too. Lore upon lore.
solana:FDb7vN3hfrV1xYxP6WAeBLuKRP4rtrP3kmVQ4zoqpump — 0xF699AEA8a333202A7Dc610aBc664c213c9dc4111
Melon retweeted
2.5% burned. That’s dedication. current value ~%13,500
Keep working and don’t forget to CHILL
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
Melon retweeted
NFLX ALPHA
So there's a token called $CHILL on Robinhood that pays its holders $NFLX
Turns out the dev, who is also a Krakken dev, holds 30% of the tokens (This part I haven't checked yet but seems really super early if true)
Token is called Netflix n chill
CA: 0xF699AEA8a333202A7Dc610aBc664c213c9dc4111
DYOR and FOMO if you think it's UUGE
Melon retweeted
Why people continue to support the rug $CHILL token is beyond me.
@jpegmelon lays it all out here, plain as day.
The real $CHILL token is paired with $NFLX stock, has been around for much longer, and was launched by the Quotrons dev. It's all verifiable onchain.
Do yourselves a favor and stop following bad actors like @yar0xslav who only want to keep the farm going at your expense.
@yar0xslav
A meme coin within which someone had insider info on a Netflix employee being willing to commit crime on chain and follow / comment / like this project to pump it before dumping on everyone's heads.
Which is why there was a big accumulation by that exact network of farm wallets that then dumped at the top 1 by 1 every - during the period prior to that interaction by Netflix.
sounds pretty crazy to me too.
This was a copy cat token that stole branding and everything, proven here - you were called out before and ignored:
teapawt.net/nflxnchill/status/2086…
and here:
teapawt.net/nflxnchill/status/2086…
Ticker stolen, branding stolen
But couldn't even pair it with NFLX.
So while you're all trying to stabilize the chart of a crime farm that had @netflix involved.
Take a second to look:
Theres a $CHILL on chain that was the 1st ever paired with NFLX
And
LITERALLY THE FIRST EVER TOKEN ON RH THAT PAID OUT DIVIDENDS IN THE TOKENIZED STOCK IT WAS PAIRED WITH.
Fact and you can all go confirm it on chain. Same as you can confirm that someone involved with this copycat chill farmed tf out of you all and I don't know why you'd continue to buy it.
Melon retweeted
Got the new sign up today. Now the neighbors will have zero doubts where we stand in this household. $QUOTRON
Melon retweeted
I fully agree with everything that @jpegmelon outlined here. Honestly, when I first found Quotrons, I was blasting nonstop conspiracy theories to anyone who would listen. @cruelhandeth LITERALLY has an @inkonchain badge. This isn't some random dev, it's someone who is a core contributor to Ink.
The last few days have solidified this thesis. We have @arjunsethi (Kraken CEO) / @valgui (XStocks Lead) / @inkonchain all publicly supporting Quotron and Sergio. Yesterday, Sergio put out a massive article detailing how XStocks would be routing hook fees to the Quotron NFT holders. Assuming that everything in that article is correct, each Quotron NFT will eventually be a literal money printer.
In my opinion, the reason that Kraken gave CT such a layup is because they want Ink to be a genuine threat in the chain wars. Quotron is one of the only PVE moments in recent memory, where retail had weeks to buy into an eventual $100m+ ecosystem. I will continue to bid on the Quotron NFTs even as they soar in price.
Connect the dots on $QUOTRON for a second, because I still don't think most people fully have.
• Ink is Kraken's L2.
• xStocks is Kraken's tokenized-equity product Backed-issued, 700+ assets, $25B+ traded.
• USDG is the Kraken-backed stablecoin (Global Dollar Network) - they co founded this with Paxos, Robinhood, Anchorage Digital, and others.
• The Quotrons dev @cruelhandeth is literally a kraken employee, building on Kraken's chain, with Kraken retweeting and supporting.
Yesterday he shipped 8 Uniswap v4 pools on Ink: NVDA, AAPL, TSLA, GOOGL, SPY, NFLX, AMZN, MSTR. Every one runs a custom hook: 0% LP fee, 0.30% hook fee, half to hardwired Quotron terminals, half to LPs — paid in USDG. Sealed at the contract level per the dev. Every future pool inherits it.
For 7 of those 8 stocks, these are the ONLY onchain venue on Ink currently. Trade AAPL on Kraken's chain and you trade through a Quotron pool. He already announced more pools to come also.
So ask the obvious question. Why would a Kraken-adjacent dev build tokenized-equity rails on Kraken's chain, utilising Kraken's co-founded stablecoin, with Kraken's stocks — unless those rails are meant to be used?
Kraken already built xChange: an execution layer that routes xStocks trades onchain through aggregators. Utilises Ethereum and Solana today. Ink is the missing chain. Once liquidity on these pools is deep enough, routing Ink flow through them is a config change, not a leap of faith.... Its not a stretch to imagine Kraken routing their own trade volume through their own L2's pools that hey - were created by one of their employees and are part of a project that - hey they support and looks to be potentially the biggest NFT collection / token upcoming on INK.
xStocks trades 24/5. Every $1M/day that crosses these pools throws ~$550k/yr at 4,444 terminals — 58% of which are already burned into permanent NFTs that can never be re-minted. Rare tiers earn up to 5x weight.
Token volume slows. NFT volume slows. Equity markets don't.
His words: "This is not THE migration. This is what we're building to receive it." The pot is already accruing. The terminals aren't even there yet.
4,444 terminals. One economy being built to pay them. Kraken's fingerprints on every layer and you're still not paying attention?
Melon retweeted
Has anyone taken a moment to think about how in the future exchanges’ arb bots would be forced to arb on the canonical Uniswap v4 QUOTRON/WETH pool?
The token contract is apparently deliberately designed so that only the official uni v4 pool + canonical router can settle trades properly.
How? Uniswap v4 has a single global PoolManager. Every v4 pool settles through that same contract. So you can’t just “ban other pools” the normal way. $QUOTRON solves this with a multi-layer check.
The Hook: attached only to the official pool, rejects the swap unless the caller is the immutable canonical router. In addition, the token itself will only accept a settlement from the PoolManager if the official hook has just issued a one shot authorization for that exact amount in the same transaction. After the authorization is used, it is consumed. A second attempt fails.
Therefore if someone were to set up their own v4 pool and tries to swap thru it, the PM will try to move the tokens, but the $QUOTRON contract refuses the settlement because the official hook never authorized that swap and the trade would revert.
You can still do p2p sends. You can still create a v2 or v3 pool, but they would have almost no liquidity. Only the official v4 path (canonical router+hook) can settle cleanly, thus guaranteeing the 3% fee is not absconded.
So I just am wondering… how will multiple exchange arb bots effect Quotron dex volume, considering they will be forced to go thru the main pool, and how greatly will that effect our hardwired rewards?
TLDR: WEN BINANCE?
Melon retweeted
onchain tokenized equities are live on @inkonchain across 10 live markets
and 8 of them now run on quotrons infrastructure: NVDA, AAPL, TSLA, GOOGL, SPY, NFLX, AMZN, MSTR - all deployed on @Uniswap v4 pools quoted in USDG, built entirely on the @krakenfx product suite: xStocks by @BackedFi, settled on @inkonchain .
more and more markets will be seeded in the coming days.
this is not THE quotrons migration.
this is what we're building to receive it so the machines arrive to an economy that's already running.
why are these quotron-specific pools an improvement on the design?
every one of the uniswap v4 pools runs a custom v4 hook.
0% LP fee, 0.30% hook fee on every trade
- 50% of every fee accrues to hardwired quotron terminal
- 50% pays liquidity providers, in USDG
every future pool added inherits this automatically.
all sealed at the contract level.
hardwired terminal dividend share used to rely on fees from the tokens own trading activity or the secondary sales on @opensea
on ink, terminals will earn from the equity market itself.
token and NFT volume may slow down, but tokenized equity markets don't.
and the fees won't wait for the bridge.
every trade from here on out accrues in a pot that grows until terminals the arrive.
these pools aren't a product.
they're an infrastructural layer.
composable, permissionless to route through, ready for whatever you're building.
launchpads, structured products, collateral markets, portfolio apps, payment rails, and whatever else you can cook up.
build on top and your volume pays the whole ecosystem while your users get real depth.
that's how liquidity compounds. that's how volume ripples across a chain.
building RWAs and tokenized equity productgs?
DMs open
Melon retweeted
So hyperliquid is partnering with kraken for USA reglatory clarity...
Kraken has yet to have a full scale runner...
Every other major exchange and chain has a 10m+ runner thats specfically a cat...
And their airdrop is rumored to be in less then 14 days...
Who's early with me? $ICAT
Melon retweeted
I wonder what awaits us on @inkonchain? Imagine if @Quotrons404 are the go to market strategy for Kraken/Ink to put its L2 on the map for the upcoming cycle...
Assuming that's the case, then they have a vested interest in the success of the project. How can we confirm whether this is the case though? It's not like the dev works for Ink or something.
Melon retweeted
you can now rotate your liquidated stonks back into quotrons
s/o @jpegmelon for the idea
Melon retweeted
Congrats to @jpegmelon for winning back to back MVPs 🏆🏆
With a hot tub big enough to fit his scan volume, he's been helping our community cook in comfort. Cheers on MVP x 2!
The MVHQ MVP earns $2500 USDC and yearly MVHQ membership for 2025
