indonesian, random, running, cycling, basketballin, neurooncology, fibrosarcom survivor
Joined September 2009
- Tweets31.5K
- Following563
- Followers3.7K
- Likes13.6K
Hai!
Rasanya senang sekali bisa share soal kanker dan update kehidupan saya di sini.
Monggo ditonton dan didengarkan ya, kawan2!
youtu.be/hbrvpJth6qo?si=ZhGd… via @YouTube
KAMIL retweeted
Bombing Iran in the middle of negotiations, while starving Cuba, while genociding Palestinians, while threatening to invade Greenland… the US and Israel are the single greatest threat to humanity and it’s not even close. We are all forced to live in the nightmare they create.
KAMIL retweeted
Guys, terakhir nih sebelum tidur.
Aku enggak ada urusan sama mbak-mbak LPDP itu. Dan enggak mau tahu juga urusannya.
Mau dia disuruh ganti rugi, balikin duit, atau apapun istilahnya, terserah!
Tapi, intinya, kalian harus tahu suara orang yang kecewa atau bahkan di tahap menyesal jadi WNI itu berasal dari pemerintah yang enggak becus menjalankan negara.
Setiap berganti rezim, bukannya makin benar, rakyat makin sengsara.
Sedikit saran, itu energi galaknya boleh juga nanti setelah si mbak-mbak itu habis diproses, dialihkan ke pejabat-pejabat yang kerjanya enggak bener.
Soalnya pejabat itu gaji, tunjangan, dan anggaran apapun yang dia pakai, itu duit pajak rakyat, duit keringat rakyat. Kalau dia kerja enggak benar, itu artinya dia ngeludahin rakyat.
Sekalian juga sama aparat.
Mari kita kawal semua orang-orang yang makan dan hidup pakai duit pajak rakyat untuk bisa berkontribusi dan kerja benar untuk menyejahterakan rakyat.
KAMIL retweeted
Katakanlah Anda kuliah S2/S3 di sebuah kampus terpencil di kota pinggiran Korea yang rangkingnya jauh di bawah UI, ITB, dan UGM.
Di bidang STEM. Teknik Elektro, Ilmu Komputer, Teknik Material, atau Kimia.
Di lab yang well funded dengan Profesor yang respectable.
Maka Anda:
1) Umumnya punya fasilitas lab yang lengkap. Alat gak perlu mikir, bahan gak perlu beli, mencit udah ada, reagen tersedia. PC high end, laptop disediakan.
2) Tinggal eksperimen dengan bahan-bahan yang ada, olah datanya, dan plot grafiknya, lalu ditulis jadi paper.
3) Papernya dipublikasikan ke journal dengan APC 2000 sampai 5000 USD? Kampus yang bayarin. Gak perlu reimburse. Langsung dibayar kampus.
4) Ke konferensi di UK atau India? Berangkat aja. Biaya sudah ditanggung sama lab tempat Anda bekerja.
5) Bayar UKT? Nggak bayar. Anda pekerja lab. UKT dibayar oleh lab. Anda tinggal bekerja.
6) Biaya hidup? Anda digaji oleh lab. Bekerja 40 jam seminggu di sana.
7) Topik riset dan kebaruan? Lab didanai dengan ide dari Profesor. Anda gak perlu cari topik, tinggal ikut apa yang dia kerjakan.
8) Kelas dan tugas? Ada tapi highly irrelevant, pembimbing Anda gak terlalu peduli, yang penting IPK di atas threshold biar UKT murah, jadi lab gak keluar duit besar.
9) Anda dah lulus tapi belum mau kerja? Profesor biasanya masih butuh tenaga mantan mahasiswanya. Postdoc atau postmaster. Gajinya juga sebagai tenaga kerja. Bukan lagi gaji mahasiswa.
10) Kalau Anda single, tinggal di asrama kampus akan menghemat housing jauh. Bisa seperempat biaya tinggal di luar. Makan sudah sepaket sama asrama, apalagi kalau Anda non muslim yang bisa makan non-halal.
11) Anda juga wajib terdaftar di NHIS, BPJS kesehatannya Korea. Periksa ke dokter spesialis gak perlu antri, obat juga murah. Paling total 10-20 ribu won kalau sakit.
12) NHIS juga cover keluarga. Anak saya dirawat seminggu di rumah sakit, perlu MRI, langsung hari itu juga. Kultur bakteri buat mastiin penyakitnya apa. Rawat inap. Abisnya cuma 300 ribu won, sekitar 4 juta rupiah.
13) Kalau Anda atau istri Anda hamil, pemerintah kasih subsidi langsung 1 juta won untuk biaya kontrol dan persalinan selama kehamilan.
14) Sekolah anak-anak gratis di sekolah negeri. Dari SD sampai SMA. Gak ada biaya tersembunyi. Literally gratis. Bahkan bukunya dari sekolah.
15) Tiap sekolah menyediakan makan siang gratis. Tiap sekolah ada dapur, juru masak, dan ruang makan. Dimasak fresh di sekolah setiap hari.
16) Pemerintah juga menyediakan kelas bahasa Korea gratis. Kalau lulus level 5, dianggap setara dengan TOPIK 6 yang bisa jadi full point buat permanent residency.
17) Anak-anak juga bisa main di taman yang dibikin pemerintah. Ada taman yang isinya perosotan, jungkat-jungkit, dan ayunan di sebelah rumah saya.
Lah lom pada tau bbrp kondisi lobektomi atau (bahasa soshmed-nya) motong dan ngluarin sbagian otak justru tindakan livesaving dan terapi yang menyembuhkan.
Tapi ya syulitnya jelasinnya di soshmed
Uteke copot.
KAMIL retweeted
There’s pressure across academia: “Publish in Q1 and Q2 journals - anything less is not good enough.”
It’s a familiar mantra in many institutions. But it’s worth asking whether this expectation genuinely serves scholarship?
Here’s why you should not just focus on Q1 and Q2 journals.
1. Quartiles are not a measure of quality - only of journal-level performance.
A Q1 journal can publish weak papers. A Q3 journal can publish groundbreaking ones. Quartiles reflect citation distributions, not journal/article quality. Treating quartiles as a proxy for quality oversimplifies the complexity of research evaluation.
2. “Best fit” often matters more than “best quartile.”
A highly specialised paper may have its natural home in a niche journal that sits outside Q1/Q2. Forcing it into a top-tier venue can dilute its relevance, slow down publication, or push it into journals that are not read by the scholars that should be reading your article.
3. Impact comes from usefulness, not quartile labels.
A paper can transform industry practice or shape local policy, but appear in a Q3 or Q4 journal, or even one that is not indexed. Real-world impact rarely aligns neatly with journal-level metrics.
4. Over-emphasis on quartiles can distort behaviour.
It can encourage scholars to chase metrics instead of questions that genuinely matter. It can push early-career researchers into risk-averse strategies, narrowing creativity and discouraging interdisciplinary work that doesn’t fit the traditional mould.
5. It creates inequities - globally and institutionally.
Not all disciplines have the same availability of Q1/Q2 journals. Not all countries or universities have the same access or resources. The expectation of “Q1 or nothing” often disadvantages scholars working in emerging fields or developing regions.
For an alternative view, see: teapawt.net/fake_journals/status/1…
There’s an argument that researchers should not worry about publishing in Q1 or Q2 journals. Instead that we should just focus on doing good research.
It’s a nice idea, but in practice, it ignores how universities, funders, and the wider research ecosystem works.
Here’s why aiming for Q1 and Q2 journals still makes strategic sense.
1. Quality control matters.
Top-quartile journals usually have stronger editorial processes, deeper reviewer pools, and more robust standards. Publishing in those journals does not guarantee excellence, but it does have an impression that you have jumped a higher hurdle. It signals that your work has survived tougher scrutiny.
2. Visibility is not a luxury.
A good paper hidden in a low-visibility journal rarely has the impact it deserves. Q1 and Q2 journals tend to reach a wider audience. They are better indexed, more frequently cited and more embedded in the global research community.
3. Institutions don’t operate in a vacuum.
Promotion committees, grant panels, ranking agencies and policy bodies use journal quality metrics, as imperfect as they are. Scholars who ignore this reality can unintentionally disadvantage themselves in competitive environments where metrics still shape decisions.
4. It protects the scholarly record.
The rise of predatory journals means the line between legitimate and questionable publishing is thinner than ever. Q1/Q2 journals offer an extra layer of protection against publishing in questionable journals.
5. It builds trust - internally and externally.
Collaborators, industry partners and international peers often use journal quartiles as a quick way to judge the quality of a journal and extend that confidence (albeit incorrectly) to an article. Publishing in reputable journals reassures them that you take standards seriously and that the underlying research has weight.
For an alternative view, see: teapawt.net/fake_journals/status/1…
KAMIL retweeted
.
1,069,301 more citations and an h-index increase of 159. ... and in just 39 days
On 01 Sep, I posted about Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad whose Google Scholar profile showed that he had over three million citations (first image). I checked back today (9 Oct 2025) and he now has 5,194,409 citations, and an h-index of 1,835 (second image).
In 39 days his citations have increased by 1,069,301 and his h-index has increased by 159.
I would love to know how he is manipulating his account (as he obviously is).
Links
🔴Post from 01 Sep 2025: buff.ly/6oq6Vxp
🔴Google Scholar Account: buff.ly/bmOXsIM (archived at buff.ly/PKd6PmF)
🔴Previous archive of Google Scholar account (01 Sep 1025): web.archive.org/web/20250901…
Note: He has deleted several of his accounts previously, so there is no guarantee that this one will still be there, which is why we have archived it.
KAMIL retweeted
Sudah berapa kali ganti menteri sejak 10 tahun Jokowi sampai Prabowo yang belum setahun?
Perubahan dan hal baik apa yang kita rasakan setelah menteri-menteri itu diganti?
Hal yang seru dari reshuffle adalah gosip konstelasi para elit dan pembagian (rente) kekuasaan. Tak lebih.
KAMIL retweeted
Dari pidato terbaru Pak Prabowo, kami akui beliau sangat konsisten untuk yang penting ngomong dan bukan ngomong yang penting.
