笠間昇#綾瀬市　【kasamax channel】

円安については、高校で習う「近隣窮乏化」を見よ。 中国からの国内直接投資への対処は為替でなく、相互主義に基づくべし。 企業経営者は海外企業買収との関係で為替をいうが、経営問題でマクロ政策を語るな

最悪の流れ。不安定な米国、中国との対立が続く中で保険をかけておきたいのだろうが、ロシアにコストを負わせる対抗措置をとらないまま、プーチンに対し「北方領土上陸は受け入れられない、JTを返せ、記者を返せ。でも対話は続けよう」という言うだけならば、ロシアの思う壺。 fnn.jp/articles/-/1151929

防衛さん、下げてくる > 財務省が防衛省に５０兆円台とする基準を示したことが分かった。 >国内総生産（ＧＤＰ）比２％に届かない水準で、政府・ 与党内の一部で浮上していた７０兆─８０兆円を大幅に下回る。

AZEC議員連盟で高市総理に提言を申し入れました。 来週、フィリピンでASEANそしてAZEC首脳会合が開催されます。 中東情勢をはじめエネルギー安全保障の重要性が増す中、AZECの期待と存在は益々大きくなっています。 高市総理には、来週のAZEC首脳会合ぜひ頑張って頂きたいと我々から申し上げました。

APEC首脳会議で高市が冷遇されると、「日本政府は抗議を行う」というAPECでの参加条件を、日本政府は文書で中国政府に突き付けたらしい。 中国メディアが報じている 特にカメラの前では、高市が「冷遇されている」に見えるようにしてはならない、としたという。 国のトップがサミットに参加するとき、政策や各国協調の話題の前に、「自分が十分なカメラ映りと好顔を確保できるかどうか」を勘定するとは、日本の存在感は薄れるどころか嘲笑の的になる。 ここまで高市に迎合しなければならない日本政府を憂う。　#中国

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Japan’s PM is heading to China for APEC hoping for a handshake: However, every major leader may get a meeting with Xi except her On the 18th and 19th of November, China hosts the APEC leaders’ summit in Shenzhen. Diplomatic sources told Kyodo that Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is likely to be the only leader among the major participants who does not get a formal meeting with Xi Jinping. Tokyo is now hoping for a handshake at best. None of this happened by accident. On the 7th of November last year, Takaichi told Japan’s parliament that a Taiwan crisis involving “warships and the use of force” could be a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan. That is the legal trigger for Japan’s military to join a war. Abe never said that as prime minister. Kishida would not say it either. China’s ambassador to the UN called it the first time since Japan’s defeat in 1945 that a Japanese leader had threatened force against China in an official setting. A year later, she still has not withdrawn it. In 1972, Japan signed a joint communique with China. It said Japan “fully understands and respects” China’s position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of its territory. Japan also said it deeply reproached itself for the damage its war caused the Chinese people. That was not a suggestion. It is the foundation of the whole relationship. China has not just talked. It has acted. It warned its citizens against travelling to Japan, and about 491,000 tickets were cancelled. Japanese seafood imports stopped. Dual-use exports to Japan’s military were banned. Chinese visitors to Japan fell 55.5 percent in the first nine months of this year. Meanwhile, Tokyo has kept going. This week, it signed a ¥4.3 billion deal to give the Philippine military coastal radar and drones. It is considering raising its five-year defence budget to as much as ¥80 trillion. In August, Takaichi sent an offering to the Yasukuni Shrine, which honours 14 Class-A war criminals. China’s Foreign Ministry put it simply: “The current serious difficulties in China-Japan relations are entirely the responsibility of the Japanese side.” Western media will call this a snub. It is not a snub. It is a consequence. Why should China roll out the red carpet for a leader who will not honour the agreement her own country signed?