Cardano & midnight Stake Pool Operator, Mithril Signer, Intersect Open Source Committee alumni, Co-founder @CardanoCube
Berlin, Germany
Joined February 2021
- Tweets9.2K
- Following4.8K
- Followers3.4K
- Likes23.2K
What has Twitter become? I want to auto-create content on their platform. Content is what keeps the platform interesting and alive. Imho it should encourage content creation. Instead they charge $0.20 per automated post that includes a link. 💀
Hey @blinklabs_io you finally got that little gopher with its "swimming ring" covered on cardanocube: cardanocube.com/projects/gou…
I spent 820€ on midnight server infrastructure this year. Zero income since community participation was postponed one year. Not sure I want to renew my one-year contract and trust it won't just mean I am wasting this money again. Opinions?
Robin - LACE pool retweeted
The latest Lace for iOS & Android has been approved and is rolling out now!
What's new:
• In-app swaps (iOS)
• Banxa on-ramp is back (iOS)
• CardanoCube integration is now live
• Ledger & Trezor hardware wallet support for Cardano
• Sort tokens by quantity, value, or ticker
• Add contacts or choose your own accounts directly from Send
• New network information card in the Staking Center
• Plus, performance improvements & various refinements across the app
Thanks for your patience while we worked through the review process! Please let us know what you think below once you've updated 👇
iOS: apps.apple.com/us/app/lace-w…
Android: play.google.com/store/apps/d…
What will @emurgo do with funds that won't be claimed? 🫥
> The vulnerability exists at the address and private key level
I don't buy it until you provide hard evidence for this claim. You, a founding entity, blaming cardano's most basic infrastructure for your own mistakes?
Sad day.
Thank you, it's a great feeling when I see someone made a conscious decision to delegate to my pool.
This "Noah Doe" lawsuit is a wild play to get legal title before quantum tech can crack keys. But NY courts have zero jurisdiction over global wallets, and HODLing isn't "abandonment." Property law requires intent to throw it away.
A Wyoming LLC filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court seeking ownership of 39,069 Bitcoin wallets it claims are abandoned property.
The plaintiff, operating under the pseudonym "Noah Doe," says he built an algorithm to identify dormant Bitcoin wallets that have been inactive for at least five to six years. He brought USB drives containing the wallet addresses to the NYPD's 17th Precinct, reporting them as found property under New York's lost-and-found law.
The complaint claims notices were sent to wallet owners via OP_RETURN blockchain messages, a public webpage, and a global press release. Owners were given 90 days to respond. Of the original 42,001 wallets flagged, 2,932 were removed after some showed on-chain activity. The remaining 39,069 wallets did not respond.
The plaintiff is now asking the court to declare him the legal owner of all 39,069 wallets and the Bitcoin inside them under New York Personal Property Law Article 7-B, which governs found and abandoned property.
The wallets reportedly hold approximately 3.8 million BTC. The complaint argues that losing a private key does not destroy the property interest in a wallet, likening dormant wallets to abandoned bank accounts.
The case names all 39,069 wallet holders as "John Doe" defendants. The plaintiff is not claiming to have the private keys to any of the wallets. He is seeking a court order declaring ownership.
The complaint was filed May 1, 2026 under Index No. 153119/2026.
h/t @DailyStackHQ
Please understand this. Do we want to become a better version of the current governance systems, or are we building another that rewards corruption?
An explicit abstain directly lowers the threshold for that proposal to pass while removing the potential for suspicion/appearance of conflict of interest and self-promotion, it is the right practice. Similarly, if DReps are NOT going to vote on each proposal, they should abstain rather than be a "no" by default.
Robin - LACE pool retweeted
Who funds the Bitcoin app maintenance on Ledger?
2,060,000 ADA for Ledger to maintain the Cardano app for 12 months.
The pitch: direct maintenance from @Ledger Technologies SAS so Cardano users get timely updates, bug fixes, firmware compatibility and support for new network features.
Hardware wallet support matters.
But this proposal has almost no detailed milestone breakdown yet.
My read: important infrastructure, weak detail.
Would you fund this now, or ask Ledger to come back with a clearer scope?
*Not a paid promotion
Robin - LACE pool retweeted
Please vote no on this. Ledger earns money selling HW wallets, unless they offer to send some of their profits back the treasury, they can f*ck off.
Robin - LACE pool retweeted
Have a look and rate your favorite project!
Onchain project ratings are now live on Cardano Cube, first initiated by @BeginWallet.
You can rate projects directly from the project explore page, queue up multiple ratings, and submit them onchain in a single batch transaction.