le Coin Bureau

No election can be honestly or legally certified if the following aren't known: 1. How many qualified voters are on the rolls. 2. How many qualified voters voted. 3. Who, among qualified voters, voted. The voter rolls in most states cannot answer those questions. On that basis, no election can be honestly or legally certified. "Certification" is an attestation that the vote count is both legitimate and accurate. I wrote a peer reviewed article on this subject, published in the Journal of Information Warfare (link in comments). Read it and see for yourself why the midterms can't be legally certified, and why many past elections shouldn't have been certified. When states refused @HarmeetKDhillon 's request for their rolls, the DOJ should have immediately seized them. No lawsuits, no court involvement, just a reaction to what amounts to a national emergency: elections cannot be certified when the rolls are compromised. @PatriotMarkCook @marklevinshow @SecMullinDHS @KingSolomon006 @ZoomWalter @FSociety_1942

Every year I am told, "We'll fix elections after we win the [broken] election." Does anyone see the logical flaw in the statement? It's like saying, "as soon as I finish bailing out the boat with this strainer, we can sail to our destination." My reasons have to do with the voter rolls. They are so riddled with errors and illegal entries that no one can know with certainty how many qualified voters they contain, how many voted in any given election, or which ones voted. @PatriotMarkCook has different reasons for saying the same thing: the machines don't need to be hacked to commit fraud, the software as designed allows it. That is such a serious security breach that none of the tabulators should be trusted for anything other than use as a paperweight. @KingSolomon006 has own reasons as well, and they are just as valid: analysis of cast vote records shows algorithmic control over voting that is beyond suspicious, it cannot be natural. @realJoeHoft has confirmed that the problems we have found would set off every alarm bell and red flag in a normal audit. And yet, the systems continue to be used. Other problems exist, but the failure of the rolls should be good enough on its own to cancel elections until fixed. Ippersonation fraud at the polls is so rare that it isn't a serious factor in elections. This is why status quo election defenders trot it out as if it is the only type of fraud encountered in elections. It isn't. Far from it. These two links are from the Storm Summit in Las Vegas and Lara Logon's 100th Going Rogue podcast. In both, Mark, Ed, Joe, and I explain why voter rolls can't be trusted and why that means elections can't be trusted. Elections haven't been reliable for years, likely decades, but have gotten to the point where it may be impossible to defeat built-in fraud. Even 100% turnout with 100% voting for the same candidate can be overcome with the vulnerabilities currently built into our election infrastructure. The solution is the National Guard or military seizing equipment and documents and finally conducting the investigation quisling judges have prevented for the past two years. teapawt.net/PatriotMarkCook/status… teapawt.net/ZarkFiles/status/20987…

I have zero faith that last night's election results are valid or real. It makes me wonder why I voted. Then I remember. It's because, although I knew the results couldn't be real, I hoped they might be close enough to real that the entire country wouldn't be destroyed. Well, that was stupid. The military should have called off the election while election infrastructure was fixed. Now, the military will still have to take over. This time to annul last night's fraudulent results. Then, infrastructure must be fixed, and elections can occur again. It makes no sense to continue using a broken system in the hope it will fix itself, or to accept the results as valid when we know the inputs are invalid.

My current take on election integrity: 1. 2020 election(s) definitely stolen 2. Voter and election fraud have been occurring in America since colonial times and should be expected. 3. It should be more controversial to say "the election results are completely accurate" than "the election was stolen." 4. "Voter/Election fraud" doesn't always cause a "Stolen Election." Sometimes, the fraud isn't sufficient to overcome the honest vote. 5. There are many theories regarding how elections are stolen. Some appear to conflict with each other, others naturally complement each other. 6. There are many ideas on how to "fix" elections. Not all are wrong, not all are right. 7. No election should be certified as long as the voter rolls aren't accurate or current. This means all elections for about the past 15-20 years should not have been certified. 8. There is too much evidence of fraud, and too many categories of fraud supported by the evidence, to dismiss the idea. 9. The quantity of fraud evidence is the problem, not the lack of it. That, and the lack of credible explanations. 10. Officials in most jurisdictions treat normal requests for answers as if they were in a hostile deposition. Their unwillingness to answer questions makes it very difficult to understand some of the evidence. 11. It wouldn't surprise me if some of the evidence for fraud later turns out to be innocent, but do not believe this is true for all or even a majority of it. Again, lack of answers from the responsible officials makes it difficult to vet the quality of evidence, and forces a negative inference on everything. 12. Quantity of evidence+diversity of evidence categories+lack of official responses=confusion. 13. In any other context, this level of evidence+confusion would cause all of the infrastructure to be rebuilt from the ground up. Too complicated to understand = too complicated to use. UNFIT FOR USE.

In a typical Perry Mason episode, the entire case hinges on a tiny detail. That detail proxes that X did Y, and Perry's client is innocent. For instance, in the most recent episode I saw, the case was proven by the impression made by a tiny tack used to attach a rubber tip to a man's cane. Elections are different. In elections, there are so many tidal waves of evidence that can be used to prove illegality, that one has to navigate them as if immersed within tidal waves, struggling to the surface for air, and grabbing whatever shreds one can on the way up. This is far from the "no evidence" fiction promulgated by the media, and assisted by crooked judges in crooked courts, crooked prosecutors, and other crooked officials. When I discuss the subject with others, I am amazed at how many types of evidence are immediately disqualified for reasons that make no sense, and would not be disqualified in a normal prosecution. For instance, election watchers kicked out of polling stations in 2020 raises the natural inference that something untoward is going on. As does video of people counting ballots, seemingly the same ones over and over again, after sending everyone home on a false pretenses. Stopping the count at the same time in multiple states, but somehow the count goes up in exactly the same way in all of those locations despite their being unmanned, these all create reasonable suspicion and justification for investigation. Then you have hundreds of witnesses signing affidavits under penalty of perjury that they witnessed the counting of what appeared to be fake ballots, fake signatures on ballot envelopes, fake registrations, altered vote totals, broken seals on locked ballot boxes, broken chain of custody everywhere, missing ballots, count discrepancies, alteration of voting methods without ratification or opposition from state legislatures. The list is long. Then there is evidence of compromised infrastructure: voter rolls that aren't fit for purpose, tabulators and poll pads that all have modems and are definitely connected to the Internet, with data showing outgoing and incoming connections to foreign servers in China, Canada, Serbia, Ukraine, Italy, and other places. Our elections are about as legitimate as Bruce Jenner is a woman. And yet, we live in a society that insists we accept that Bruce Jenner is in fact a woman named Caitlin, and that the religion that celebrated the 9/11 attacks in America and the 10/7 attacks in Israel is "peaceful." The mere fact that people ask me, "if you rule out 99.999% of the evidence, with just 0.001% remaining, could you still prove fraud?" Is shocking. The fact that I can answer "Yes" should be even more shocking.

My plan: 1. Destroy the current voter rolls in every state 2. Rebuild the rolls from scratch by hand 3. Voters must register in person with proof of citizenship, identity, and residence 4. No mail-in registrations from anyone, no matter how inconvenient This plan, unlike all other proposals, eliminates the biggest election fraud vector at its source: the justification for every ballot. Any plan that ignores this is leaving a huge back door wide open. Fixing the way ballots are counted is meaningless if the ballots counted were generated from false or misappropriated ID numbers. We don't need to know who committed what fraud to justify doing this. The current state of voter rolls nationwide is enough to know they aren't fit for use and must be 100% replaced, not just "cleaned." Again, anything less than this is fool's gold at the end of the rainbow, and it's a fake rainbow.