Anglo-Saxonism is my one core commitment. 🏴🇬🇧🇳🇿
Hartsfell, Scotland
Joined January 2019
- Tweets29.1K
- Following492
- Followers3.8K
- Likes3.5K
Pinned Tweet
We're live, working through the backlog. 🔥
Season 2 of Mond starts soon. 🐱2️⃣
Featuring:
- new guest posts
- Anglo GC (tightly vetted)
- Mond GC (tightly vetted)
- substack compilations of key threads (including good interlocutor contributions and glossary of developed terms)
- Reading lists
- Distributed research push on a defined 'problem of the month' (best contribution promoted by community).
Season 1 accomplished several conceptual breakthroughs, improved epistemic circuits with growing error correction capacity, and non-trivial damage dealt to our ops. I want to thank the interlocutors (self-avowed "mondcels") who contributed their own effortpoats in addition to the several "subject matter expert" guest posters I called upon. Now that I've "taken care of some things", I can return - "relaxed and detached" of course - for a new arc.
We will continue to expand our presence qualitatively as the implosion of the populist right continues apace before new cognitive warfare modalities can take hold (trust me, they are coming).
"One man alone in a room with a computer, a typewriter as it was, can change the world. A few people alone in a room, if they cleave to an idea whose time has come, can still change the world." - Bowden
found out the vast majority aren't serious and even when they say something that's true it's because either they're shills or the vibe space dictates it. They lack a core commitment. When my model of politics produced failed predictions, I jettisoned it and all associated sources of (anti) knowledge.
The BAPsphere promoted an overlapping product during the 2021-2024 "off-season". Only reason TND, semi-ironic pedo valorisation, WAGTFKY, and anti-women sentiment applied as implements of a "negative therapy" didn't result in terrorism was the passivity of the schizoid audience.
When it comes to Fuentes, I have my criticisms and differences methodological and ideological I have expanded upon elsewhere - but consider the following thought experiment: let's imagine he meets whatever ideal buffers the rightoid fusion state that compensates for their basic ego weakness.
He's a 6'4 flaxen haired Anglo-Prot/Nietzschean blonde beast drawn from an old stock New England family, married to a smoke show wife, has no history of associating with insalubrious characters, and has remained consistently Trump critical from the get-go (can't accuse of him of flip-flopping). There are no traces of sussy moments or affections to level against him. He's basically Apollo with Northwest European characteristics.
Do we believe such a "Nicholas Spring" (Anglo cognate for the root of Fuentes) would find a good faith hearing? Or do we think the polemical categories fired up to discredit him are a happy accident for the GOP/Trump/Vance/alt-zog attack dogs?
While it doesn't thrill me a slightly off-White, Catholic, White ethnic has moved into pole position on the right, English fairmindedness compels me to evaluate his impact in the grander scheme of things according to these considerations. It what it is. I deal in reality, not the copes of izzatized e-fursonas enslaved to the occulted frames of gurus performing "negative therapy" their own followers.
I'm happy in my own lane, and I don't advise aspirant elites to become AF groypers (although highborn groypers can be fellow travellers where common ground presents itself). Rather, we should see those headway enabling elements Fuentes has struck upon at scale as a competitive spur to our own program.
And indeed, that's what we planetary Anglos have already started enacting in the Antipodean sector of the right; clearing out the deadwood, the ziggers, the shills for the populist failure mode, the jewish owned subversives (e.g., Jordan Knight, incubated by BAP), the slightest whiff of pro-Zionist tolerance or sentiment, and the anti-British hobbits. We'll expand across the Anglosphere in a holy cognitive war for the hearts and minds of our people, a great jihad by an uncompromising generation pivoting toward a golden path.
Lemurian🍍 retweeted
If you don't actively oppose the populist politicians selling us down the river, but do make a fine living from donations and social media, then you're a grifter and traitor.
You all bang on about immigration for X shekels, but don't dare criticise Lowe or Farage. It's pathetic.
Lemurian🍍 retweeted
I don’t wanna see uk right wingers on my timeline anymore. It’s actually torture watching reform and restore shills argue with each other about which populist is better.
If I unfollow or block u it’s not personal I just don’t want this slop on my TL anymore. You’re all retarded
Lemurian🍍 retweeted
It’s one thing to change your position on something because circumstances change. E.g. supporting Trump 2016 before he sold out or having sympathy towards Russia prior to Putin’s denazification war of attrition in Europe. That’s healthy, it reflects agency and the ability adapt to new information.
It’s another to be a self-styled political “influencer” and do heel-turns on basic ideological premises, like whether or not the founding fathers defensible. There’s a name for people like this: “retard”. And there’s a name for anyone who is impressed anything such as @doomernat22 has to say: “double retard”
NF did a good job here delivering a "real history of populism since 2015" (including the BASED European parties).
The populist regime was imposed via a transnational apparatus. Thus, the answer to globalism is not conventional nationalism but a planetary politics of our own.
Lemurian🍍 retweeted
Surely this has no connection to Intel buying $20 billion in land from Leslie Wexner for the Ohio semiconductor fab via the New Albany Company, and then money magically flowing downstream to Israeli start-ups.
Intel also got $1.5 billon dollars from the CHIPS Act to build the Ohio One campus, and they also received over $1.8 billion from local and state governments in the form of rebates, cash grants, and tax incentives.
American tax-payer dollars enriching Israeli start-ups should be a total scandal.
not the best comparison. Soros specializes in NGOs, academic funding, and local politics (e.g., DAs), but it does point to the tendency of uncool capital toward brute forcing desired outcomes through crash programs that mobilize the chud id on an unprecedented scale.
The silver lining: his demise in 2012 protected his legacy from tranimalization by the alt/dissident right content mills. An eccentric recorded on a toaster speaking to a couple dozen BNP faithful is a world apart from appearing in 4k on a grifter's pointless podcast.
