@lespin
Vienna
Joined June 2008
It's been a few weeks since #KDD2026 in Jeju and it was a lot to take in. First KDD, first time in South Korea, ~4K attendees. I presented our work on auditing LLMs as scholar recommender systems. 🧵 1/6
1
7
360
New preprint on gender inference for Chinese names. We train models on hanzi, aggregate their predictions to pinyin via transliteration, and quantify each name’s ambiguity. It outperforms Namsor, GPT and Claude. paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.23734 vis tool: vis.csh.ac.at/notmygender
1
2
132
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
Attention arXiv authors. Because of the exponential increase in submissions, arXiv is limiting the number of papers that a person can submit each month to two. 1/
arXiv has updated our policy on rate limiting for all submitters. This update was made to fairly distribute moderator time & support the arXiv community of staff, volunteers, readers & authors. Please read our announcement to learn more: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/up…
43
194
41
1,467
207,868
A lot of opportunities come through the people we know. But when connections shape who gets rewarded, what counts as fair? In our new preprint on network fairness, we identify 10 network effects that can shape human and algorithmic decisions: arxiv.org/abs/2609.13867
1
8
203
The "Beyond Scaling" panel raised a lot of questions: limits of scaling, structure vs. more data, rethinking evaluation, and trust in high-stakes settings. 5/6
1
1
67
A trilogy mapping how LLMs surface or overlook scholars: - I (6 LLMs): arxiv.org/abs/2506.00074 - II (22 LLMs) extended: arxiv.org/abs/2602.08873 - III (44 LLMs): arxiv.org/abs/2605.28187 - Tool and leaderboard: vis.csh.ac.at/whosenamecomes… 6/6
1
57
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
📢I am hiring interns at the Max Planck Institute! Topics of interest: (1) LLM factuality, reliable information synthesis and reasoning (esp. in agentic settings), personalization (2) AI creativity (3) Data-centric interpretability Apply here by Sep 15: shorturl.at/RmSb1
24
117
2
1,058
133,850
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
¿Te interesa la ciencia de redes sociales? El Social Networks Group - UC organiza este seminario el 12 de agosto de 2026, de 10:30 a 16:30, en Campus San Joaquín. #NetworkScience uc.cl/agenda/actividad/inves…
2
4
179
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
🚀 ¡Las postulaciones para KHIPU 2027 abren pronto! Del 5 al 9 de abril de 2027, São Paulo será sede del encuentro latinoamericano de inteligencia artificial. 🚨Para participar, es necesario aplicar 🎓 Numerosas becas disponibles para alojamiento y transporte 📅 Apertura de postulaciones: 20 de julio de 2026 ⏳ Cierre de postulaciones: 31 de agosto de 2026 Conoce más sobre las ediciones anteriores en khipu.ai 📣 ¡Corré la voz! #KHIPU2027 #InteligenciaArtificial #IA #Latinoamérica #Becas #SãoPaulo
8
3
23
2,223
Today I'm presenting three pieces of our work at @ICSSIConference, if you are around, let's chat. 1/4 @CSHVienna @NetInCSH
2
1
9
590
#Parenthood and academic careers in Europe, led by Paula Nauta: We look at how becoming a parent affects the careers of mothers and fathers in academia across Europe. Being a parent not necessarily drops your productivity! bit.ly/ParenthoodEuropeICSSI… 3/4
1
95
#DepartmentSize and growth dynamics, led by @JanBachmann11: How do academic departments grow, and what drives their size distributions? 4/4
58
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
Exciting new paper using LLMs to map individual-level belief networks by @vic_moeller and colleagues. It's a great time to revisit classic debates about how public opinion is structured.
2
14
83
5,609
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
Fantastic analysis from journal submission data. It is also encouraging to see key findings from our recent @ScienceMagazine paper on #AI impact on science — increased productivity, more complex scientific writing, and emerging quality concerns — echoed in this setting.
How are large language models impacting the submission and review process at high-impact journals? Severely. Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, AI-generated and AI-assisted papers, identified by Pangram, drove a 42% increase in submission volume at Organization Science (figure below). While the journal rejected the majority of these submissions, there is a human cost to reviewing papers, which volunteer reviewers are shouldering. AI-generated content is also showing up in reviews, which similarly suffer in quality because of it -- editors at Organization Science found that AI-generated reviews are lower quality, less specific, and less topically diverse than human-written ones. The problem is not isolated. Earlier this year, ICML desk-rejected 497 papers from authors who submitted AI-generated reviews, after those authors opted into a policy that disallowed the use of AI. Grant funders also saw a surge in applications: the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, a set of major research fellowships for the EU, received 142% more proposals in 2025 compared to 2022. Many scientific and academic systems implicitly rely on friction as a barrier to entry. LLMs have removed that friction, allowing for a deluge of AI slop that is straining the capacity of these institutions.
5
50
2
239
47,802
Lisette Espín-Noboa 🇪🇨 retweeted
I was invited to submit and just published a Perspective in @dpn_journal on launching an independent research lab focusing on leadership, team building, funding strategy, and digital infrastructure in early career science. New work from @WSUAPPLEBAUM. doi.org/10.1038/s44277-026-0…
1
4
1
15
972