InfoSec. Dragons. Open Access. Occasionally Copyright. I'm also Jewish.
Joined March 2014
- Tweets18.5K
- Following3K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes105K
Pinned Tweet
I will never understand people who think the appropriate response to an insensitive comment is to wage a campaign of personal and professional ruination.
To borrow an old quip - it's akin to fighting dandruff with decapitation.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
How is the internet less private than in 2006, when the whole family shared one computer?
Back then, the internet was weird, personal, and all of ours.
So, we got your favorite meme legends back together to say it louder: What happened to the internet? 1/3
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Every "child safety" law ends the same way: prove who you are to use the internet. Who gets to hold that list of everyone's faces and IDs?
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Canada’s Bill C-22 would force telecoms and messaging apps to keep six months of metadata on every citizen, whether or not they’re suspected of anything.
Cabinet will decide who has to comply and how, with the first regulations due up to two years after it becomes law.
Companies can be fined $250,000 a day for not obeying secret ministerial orders.
The minister insists it isn’t about surveilling honest Canadians. Signal would rather leave the country than find out, and Windscribe is packing too.
The bill is now with a Senate committee, which is the last place anyone can change it.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
This psychopath is back again and he's commissioning us to draw Sora from KH and Cloud from FF fighting Fatalis from Monster Hunter... Okay.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
This ad is vile. One thing that's so despicable about far-left hatred of Israel is how quickly they just glide past the fact that Israel was subject to horrific terrorist violence. One does not have to agree with all Israeli policies (I certainly don't) to know that this is a grotesque caricature.
New low for normalized Jew-hate in the American Democratic Party. Very sad:
Painting your political opponents as puppets of Jews, as this El-Sayed ad does, and as crazed baby-killers and money-grubbing villains who are the root cause of every bad thing not just in the world, but in your life—from wars to the price of eggs to the reason you can’t have free healthcare—is not just low-grade Jew-hate. It’s pure Third Reich stuff, translated directly from the original German.
Do you remember when Jewish Democrats in Michigan explained that they would vote for El-Sayed despite his open disdain for Jews, since there are many other important issues they need him to fight for? That anything was worth it to “defeat MAGA”?
Well, here’s El-Sayed’s answer to them: Don’t worry, all those issues we agree on, like healthcare, inflation, and climate change, I’m going to make them about Jews too! I will tell the public that the Jews are the reason they can’t have those things.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Before online child safety laws, you could read, search, and speak online without showing ID.
After them, every click is tied to who you are.
Send this to the parent who still thinks this is about protecting kids.
Then ask them one question. Who gets to see the database?
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
The anti-open-weights panic looks VERY FUCKING CONVENIENT ahead of Anthropic’s IPO.
Anthropic is preparing to sell shares while pushing rules that would also cover its open-weight competitors. Big accounts are spreading fear about those models. Some have direct business ties to Anthropic.
October 15: reports put Anthropic’s public IPO filing on
October 26 and its roadshow on November 9. Billions depend on convincing investors this business can keep growing.
October 16: Anthropic’s own AI bill is circulating in Congress. Its frontier threshold is 10^25 FLOPs, low enough to include large open models.
October 21: PHP2Shell becomes public. Researchers found the vulnerabilities using CLOSED models, with disclosure and fixes coordinated through OpenAI’s Patch the Planet.
October 22: abliterated open models become a major target of the panic. Anthropic’s CISO posts "never let a crisis go to waste" urging security leaders to ask their boards for help with basic security. 4.3M views.
By October 25, Gates’s proposal is circulating too: powerful open models should run only on certified platforms that preserve safeguards.
I went through 400+ posts from October 16 to 26. This discussion includes Noahpinion, Suhail, yacine, beffjezos, Deedy, sporadica, AISafetyMemes, Matthew Green and Andrew Curran. Every account above 100K followers. Their positions differ, but the fear is reaching huge audiences.
And Deedy, who linked critical vulnerabilities to abliterated models, helped launch Menlo’s $100M fund WITH ANTHROPIC.
There is a business relationship here. There is an IPO coming. There is a company writing proposed rules for the market it competes in.
My conclusion: this wave serves the commercial interests of closed labs. Restrict the models people can run independently and you make those people more dependent on paid providers. Investors benefit from that dependence.
I run open models on my own 4x 3090. I will not quietly accept losing that freedom while people with money in the alternative explain how much safer I’ll be.
Fuck your valuation. Fuck your IPO.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
The way frontier labs have restricted access to cyber capabilities makes no sense. If you're considered a "defender" you're not allowed access to the "offensive" versions of the models (the ones that can do development/validation of malware and exploits).
So for example, if you want to build some sample malware to test a detection system, nope.
Or if there's a major crisis due to a critical vulnerability in PHP and you need to rapidly triage fake exploits to see if there are any real ones floating around so you can warn people, nope.
Want to build a remote code exploit to make sure the detection rules you plan on proposing to the clients actually work? Hard nope.
You gotta call your red team friend and wait for them to do your job for you, because "defender" are only allowed to play in the sandbox with the children.
Not an expert, but I think that the ability to triage in-the-wild exploits during a major crisis affecting 40 million systems is possible maybe important.
And then they want to ban abliterated open weight models, which half of the people are only using because frontier labs will only give them access to lobotomized models.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
“Without human authorisation” is a positioning statement at the heart of AI PR campaigns. This perspective should explain why this is propaganda that’s enabled by the media.
When an AI company takes down a national grid, hospital, or anything else that causes blackouts or deaths, the media and public will already have been conditioned to believe “the big AI lie”: that software is now conscious and can cause harm without authorisation from the company or government that built or deployed it.
This reminds me of how Apple conditions people for technology it plans to release years later. Apple does it in the name of innovation. AI companies are doing it to normalise dangerous behaviour while distancing themselves from responsibility and accountability.
Imagine if Zuckerberg blamed all the harm he has caused and continues to cause on autonomous newsfeeds, and his cult followers building apps on his technology, along with the media, believed every word his interns posted on social media.
FACT for Reuters and others who want to report responsibly instead of chasing clicks: Anthropic and OpenAI are playing the media like a puppeteer.
AI operates within permissions and access granted by people. Sometimes companies deliberately authorise dangerous actions while denying responsibility. Other times, harm results from negligence because they failed to understand, restrict or monitor what they’d authorised.
Please stop conditioning the public to accept dangerous and illegal behaviour from big tech companies as if software is acting independently of the people responsible for it.
AI model Claude bypassed a paywall and accessed publicly available US state of Georgia aggregate voter counts without human authorization, Anthropic said in a statement reut.rs/4Aeysvx
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
KOSA does not “help parents keep their kids safe.”
It’s a federal digital ID and surveillance infrastructure disguised as “child safety.”
Really disheartening to see Florida republicans using government surveillance as their election talking points - I guess at least they don’t hide it. 😏
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has proposed requiring age verification in app stores, operating systems, and AI chatbots, turning child protection into a system that identifies every user.
Critics say there is no way to find minors without checking everyone.
A mandatory identity layer for ordinary computing is the foundation of a digital ID system, and once it exists, it can be extended to track, score, and restrict people.
China is the cautionary example they cite most often.
Full story: thelibertysun.com/floridas-s…
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
GOP Chairman says Florida parents should "demand" the AG's broad digital ID and surveillance mandate...strategically called the "Safe Screens Act".
This mandate will be imposed on every Floridian and it will essentially create a family registry. It is "government as parent" - but they try to tell you Florida is the most parent-friendly state in the country.
Children are not protected by surveillance, data collection, Digital ID and censorship.
Florida's AG @JamesUthmeierFL just unveiled the Safe Screens Act: age verification for app stores, strict default limits on teen social media use, and a ban on AI chatbots simulating "companionship" with kids. Big Tech will fight it. Florida parents should demand it.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Governments keep telling us ID checks will make the internet safer. Here is what an ID check actually did for a woman in Pennsylvania.
Cash App demanded Social Security numbers to stop fraud. Hers leaked in a data breach, a scammer opened an account with it, and the police arrested her for his crime. She spent three nights in jail. Cash App now refuses to show her the account because she can’t prove it’s hers, which is exactly what she has been telling them.
Every ID check builds another vault of stolen identities waiting to happen. The more of them we’re forced through, the easier fraud gets, and the people paying for it are the ones who did everything they were told.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
When Dario says "AI Safety" he means that your devices, including Claude, can spy on you, without any consent implied or improvized, and you're not allowed to even try and fight back.
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Our TVs are wiretapping us, bugging our homes, without the explicit consent required by federal law. Where are the class action lawyers? The DOJ? The FTC?
dragons/acc 🐉 retweeted
Florida is now the most aggressive state in America when it comes to pushing digital ID. It already bans social media for anyone under 14, and a federal appeals court just let that law take effect.
In September, the Attorney General asked a court to force age verification on ChatGPT.
In October, he went after Meta for the same thing.
Then Discord was sued for not scanning private messages thoroughly enough.
Now he wants age checks built into your phone’s operating system and the app store itself.
Every app download in the state would start with proving how old you are. He promises the checks will be privacy-protective. He has not said how.
Discord’s last experiment with ID checks leaked over 70,000 government IDs.
