New York Times bestselling writer. A ‘rebellious’ dreamer and ‘borderline’ maniac.

California, 10 yrs Manhattan
Joined February 2013
I’ve been on Twitter for a decade but just begun using it. I am not posting much, replying more… because I still don’t quite get X. I discover and share competitive advantage* expertise (started as I was writing six books). (*Competitive advantage means I won’t blab it…)
3
1
47
21,989
If you let me turn off the “rage bait” I’d appreciate it.
2
3
38
Wisdom from Sgt. Hulka for all the “really, really profoundly sad and completely enraged” commenters for this post.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
76
“Researched” this post using AI… “The direction is defensible, but the argument is built from a vague empirical claim, a trivial one, a prediction with no timeline, and a rhetorical move that makes disagreement look like denial.” Grade D+.
1. AI is already better at doing research than 90+% of “professional” researchers. Especially in highly verifiable fields. 2. This is the worst that AI will ever get at research. 3. Very soon NOT using AI for research will be tantamount to malpractice. 4. Being in a state of willful denial about any of this is not going to get you anywhere.
38
Can we start at # 1? “Get all human knowledge for free” How did they do that? Scrape the digital world? How is that “all”? Additionally did it scrape the limited knowledge (digital) comprehensively or scan parts a leap to patterns and assumptions?
The chain of events for AI and the economy: Get all human knowledge for free -> repackage and sell -> scare and preach -> act fast and reckless without thinking -> fail to scale -> fail to reach profit -> investor illusions disappears (“naked king” moment) -> go bust -> pull everyone down with them -> try gov bail out -> create a big economic crisis -> trillions datacenter CAPEX written off -> dust settles -> a few real AI enabled businesses emerge -> new approaches to AI get cheap compute -> something real emerges. We are between “act reckless” and “fail to scale”
1
1
100
So AI just told you how to fix your dishwasher? (My dad told me.) How soon will AI walk around shutting off the lights? “What? Do you think we own stock in Southern California Edison?”
60
Regarding the BofD at Theranos. “Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing." Frist, Mattis, Schultz, Kissinger etc deserve that the reputation varnish gets stripped from their resumes.
47
AI didn’t disagree with this take.
1
4
125
Can be leverage. CAN. But it can also be the opposite, as Popper warned.
Reading a book is among the most high-leverage activities on earth. What are you reading today? 👇🏼
1
86
“…the supreme goal is to make the irreducible basic elements as SIMPLE and as FEW as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience.” A Einstein IOW - Make everything simple as possible BUT never simpler.
The internet rewards people who can explain complicated things simply. That’s a skill worth developing. If you can take something your customer finds confusing and make them say, “Oh, now I get it,” you’re already selling.
100
Yesterday it was “boosting”, a pay for play scheme to inflate momentum for slop. Today it’s this. 👇🏼 Who audits social media? Who audits the auditors? How many impressions, likes, posts are fake, fake, fake?
37
300 years before Jesus (300BC) Aristotle’s friend saw half of all the posts on I’m seeing today on Twitter. 👇🏼
53
Perception bias. 1951. psycnet.apa.org/record/1954-…
It’s amazing how two people can experience the exact same event and walk away with wildly different versions of what happened, each shaped by their own theory of mind. We often assume we speak the same language, but if we can’t even agree on what we experienced, it may be a fallacy to believe we can ever fully understand one another.
90
Cheapo burritos? That doesn’t take a cook. More like “Lunch Lady Doris”. Home cooked meals are too important to serve cafeteria slop.
41
I don’t denounce. Just point to teachers like Follett, Barnard and Dixon who saw the dysfunction and incompetence of hierarchies. Not envious at all.
People who denounce hierarchies don’t actually hate hierarchies. They just hate the fact that they aren’t at the top of the hierarchies.
70
Tell Hemingway Twitter thinks aiming for perfection is ‘cause you’re scared.
79
Can’t anyone there play this game??
57
I asked AI about writing. “AI is trained on what has worked, which makes it inherently backward-looking and prone to competent mediocrity.” “Trained on what worked” I get. But why is it stuck “backward looking”? Each iteration should move the mind forward.
1
86