THE KING

a few things because there seems to be a lot of deliberate confusion around this: 1. i have repeatedly asked people not to send me tokens i've also been extremely clear that if people do send me tokens, they're doing so knowing that i can (and most likely will) sell them so sending me tokens and then calling it a 'rug' when i sell them is genuinely insane 2. i posted a clear notice before selling, not after (attached) i didn't have to do this i could have simply sold the tokens without saying anything and still been completely within my rights 3. i actually contemplated this one much more than usual because i think the idea of tokens/memecoins being paired with $USELESS is quite interesting but, as i explicitly stated in my pre-sale notice, my issue was that this appeared to be a ~2-day-old token using the exact name and branding of another ~1-month-old token token contract which was set up ~2 days ago for proof: solscan.io/token/GDeKVeV3cs6… my perception was that i had been airdropped specifically to create the impression that i was holding it, which could then be used to vamp the other token that's why i sold in this particular case 4. your post also seems to imply that the token i sold was the OG '1-year-old token' but that was not communicated on their X until hours after i sold so i'm genuinely curious: what happened to the OG token from one year ago that they claim to represent? was there an official migration? did the original holders get airdropped the new token? was there some documented progression from the old token into this one? or is the explanation simply 'we launched a fresh token, airdropped Unipcs some supply, and then later said it was the OG token after he sold'? if there are facts i'm missing, i'm completely open to them but there clearly seems to be a disconnect here and regardless, i reserve the right to sell any tokens people send me — something i've been repeatedly and emphatically clear about so anyone who continues to airdrop me tokens after all those warnings knows exactly what they're doing calling my sale a 'rug' is therefore disingenuous at best and malicious at worst and seems like a clear attempt to get triggered by nothing the timeline speaks for itself