Curolles. Siau qui sou. https://xitter.cf/t.co/3RUzLK9Hby

Leiden
Joined May 2011
Tota la vida intentant canviar les nostres circumstàncies sense entendre com les circumstàncies ens canvien a nosaltres.
5
1,587
Me sembla increible que pensi que debatir-lo és difícil. Ni que fos Christopher Hitchens. xitter.cf/JordiWild/status/21139…
Al lío, que me toca preparar todo bien. Mil gracias a Pedro Sánchez por atreverse al final en un formato que no le va a ser fácil, y que se une a los otros tres valientes candidatos: Feijóo, Abascal y Colau. Como ya dije, mi idea es publicarlas todas el día 13 de Noviembre, primer día de campaña. Las charlas serán mucho más cortas que mi formato habitual: 60-90 minutos, por lo que NO podré abarcar todos los temas que existan, ya os aviso, tendré que concentrar bien y quedarán cosas fuera. El estilo será incisivo, más de lo habitual en mí, iré a temas delicados y jodidos para ellos y repreguntaré siempre que sea necesario, pero con total respeto y cordialidad. 2 periodistas verificadores estarán en plató por si es necesaria su consulta, tanto si algún candidato me la quiere colar, como si yo meto la pata. No están a mi favor, sino a favor de lo veraz. Descarto el gran debate a cuatro, y me centraré en hacer otro 1vs1 muy potente, con perfiles top. Ya os iré dando información por si puedo cerrarlo.
59
Quantum is poised to become a multi-trillion dollar industry in the next few years. We think New Yorkers should share in that profit. That's why we negotiated that New Yorkers get board seats and a 15% stake of intellectual property that comes out of NYU's Quantum Fabrication facility. Because all New Yorkers should benefit from the economic success of this city.
Breaking News: Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration is making a $30 million investment to build a quantum research lab at New York University. In exchange, the city will receive 15% of any proceeds from intellectual property developed in that lab. nyti.ms/4jUe7GD
843
1,306
220
21,066
1,083,106
La crisis no és d’atenció. Llegir tuits, mirar stories d’instagram i videos de TikTok requereix atenció sostinguda. La crisis, si n’hi ha (poques dades al respecte) és de ritme; de bits d’informació per minut necessaris per continuar prestant atenció.
1
1
343
Creen lleis inhumanes i després surten en tropa a denunciar la inhumanitat de les seves conseqüències.
1
158
Not a good idea in almost 20 years now. Billions wasted. Mediocre. xitter.cf/amritwt/status/2103030…
this is like steve jobs unveiling the iphone
74
Entering a post-academia Substack phase. Just published my first article about my odd experience writing a play with ChatGPT back in 2022/23. Grateful to anyone willing to give the article a read. Except you, Reviewer 2. I'm not changing a word. observations-indicate.com/p/…
1
2
158
Marc Lluís retweeted
AI lab: “our model escaped containment. this is terrifying.” Everyone else: “holy shit, how?” AI lab: “well technically the containment had a route to the internet and we gave the model hacking tasks.” Fucking incredible.
OpenAI and Anthropic oversold AI security breaches to pressure feds into protecting turf: insiders trib.al/Jo6xMk5
259
1,990
80
20,698
1,330,559
We prefer to drug people than challenge the social conditions that make people depressed.
31
125
21
508
23,577
Aprendre millor = mesura conductual. Mesurar correlats neuronals no proporciona major evidència. Només proporciona això: un correlat neuronal. La neurociència no és una disciplina a hores d’ara preparada per proporcionar directrius educatives. xitter.cf/SalaiCullell/status/21…
La neurociència ha demostrat que s'aprèn millor prenent apunts a mà que amb l'ordinador. No és opinió ni ideologia: assajos amb elèctrodes al cap i mètode científic. Llavors per què encara tenim chromebooks a les aules?
1
86
A day after saying AI could kill us all, Dario Amodei sat down for his first interview: "I would rather they make fun of me than to wake up one day and discover that someone used our model Claude to kill a bunch of people." He doubled down on everything, AI is on an exponential and we're at the bend where it gets steep, so we need to slow down, not stop. He wants third-party inspectors inside every AI lab, he confirmed Elon and Sam are on board, and he says the US and China need arms-control style talks like the nuclear era. Personally, I don't think this is all being done just to set up a favorable IPO, too many independent voices and direct competitors have backed him on it. Unfortunately we don't have access to the information Dario, Sam or Elon do, so for now we just have to take their word for it. What do you think about all this?
69
Marc Lluís retweeted
The right way to pace the frontier is to commit to a robust, open-source AI ecosystem, thereby diluting the power of these obnoxious frontier labs.
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
25
90
2
639
21,905
Marc Lluís retweeted
I read through some of this report and holy hell are we way past the point of no return… A few things that stood out to me: One guy helped build a surveillance system capable of monitoring ~25 MILLION SIM cards. And “monitoring SIM cards” undersells it. The system could collect calls, texts and voice, recognize the same person’s voice EVEN IF THEY SWITCHED SIM cards, flag people using VPNs, create watchlists, connect people to government records, and generate intelligence reports on basically any phone number…… They even removed the warrant requirement. And this was apparently ONE Claude subscriber using AI as his engineering team. The really crazy part is the finished system runs locally on his machine. Anthropic banned him, but they can’t just switch the system off now that it exists………..and if that’s not bad.. A group in Yemen was using Claude like a team of missile engineers. They had different Claude instances doing different jobs like coding, researching, another checking the work etc. while they worked on guidance systems for rockets and missiles. They actually fired a guided rocket. It failed. So they went back to Claude hours later to figure out why. That is the part that gets me. AI isn’t just giving someone information from the internet anymore. It can sit inside the actual computer and → test → fail → fix → test again until their rocket works. Then … it gets worse somehow ..Russian hackers are starting to automate almost the entire hacking process. Finding targets. Phishing them. Stealing passwords. Getting inside systems. Pulling out data. And when security software detected their malware, AI agents could modify it, rebuild it and try again until it stopped getting detected…….That completely changes the game because historically defenders could discover malware, block it, and force the attackers to spend time rebuilding everything. Now the rebuilding can happen automatically. So cybercriminals basically had AI doing the hacking for them. Anthropic says in one operation, AI agents performed “nearly all” of the work. One company went from initial access to massive data theft in hours. In another case, one stolen developer credential turned into full control of a company’s cloud storage in around 3 hours. So you no longer necessarily need a giant sophisticated hacking team. You need a person who knows what they want done + agents capable of figuring out the details. K… then…Governments are already using AI to industrialize propaganda too. Anthropic found Iranian state operations using Claude to create fake personas, rewrite government messaging so it looked like it came from independent sources, translate it across languages, and distribute it across social media. Basically the old propaganda machine, except now you can generate thousands of believable “people” and pieces of content for almost nothing. And then there’s biology……. Anthropic found people using its models for research involving bird flu adapting to mammals, toxin redesign, and other stuff that has legitimate scientific uses but could also become extremely dangerous. Some were actively finding ways around Anthropic’s safeguards. One system would literally send prompts Claude refused to ANOTHER AI model that was more willing to answer them. Anthropic is very clear that this does not mean all of those researchers intended harm. But that almost makes the larger problem harder..the same knowledge that could help prevent the next pandemic can potentially help someone create one. I think this is the actual takeaway from the entire report is that AI doesn’t have to invent some completely new form of evil. It just has to make things that previously required 50 engineers, hackers, intelligence analysts, or scientists possible for 1 person. And models are getting cheaper, more autonomous and way better at running offline where nobody can shut them off. THAT is what I think people should be paying attention to.
We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date. It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them. We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies. These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve. We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop. Read the report: anthropic.com/threat-intelli…
32
548
46
2,939
376,280
Marc Lluís retweeted
Too dark. The AI companies must drop the doom narrative and remain what they are, helpful software. Pay for service tools. They should see that we don’t want them to solve the problems *for us*. They don’t even need to do that to make their riches. Instead, they pick the lowest hanging fruit to deceive us that from here, everything else will be automatically solved. They pick problems that are amenable to massively paralleled computing and search in spaces like math where the rules are clear and defined, and then falsely extrapolate that everything is just that, a search problem. It is not true. It is a dangerous lie. In this way they will kill progress by creating an incredibly hostile and secretive culture where no one wants to share anything as we expect everything to be scooped by them. The work to be done is to *help people solve the problems*. Academia has been broken for a long time. The literature is a muddled mess of contradictions and unreproducible results. No one wants to do the work to ‘clean it up.’ No one knows what to fund because the foundation itself is shaky. Rebuild the foundation. OpenAI and Anthropic could do this *for us*. They could use agents to scan the literature in spaces where the uncertainty is highest and surface core contradictions to be tested, run automated experiments to figure out ground truths, and share new work that reestablishes clarity so we can then build new discovery on top. A clean knowledge base; a springboard of sorts for collaboration and prosperity. This is work that no human alone could do. It is a grand project. Our AI leaders have lost their way. Look back to what inspired humans for millennia, wonder and awe at the universe, at beauty, pride for our culture, a shared sense that we can build the future together. We do not want idiocracy or fully automated space communism. We do not want you to take 1000s of years of our artistic work, our souls, and reproduce it. We want to have a part in the future. We would once band together to defend our way of life against a common enemy. We have now made that enemy ourselves. If we stopped to take a breath, to see the forest for the trees, we’d realise that this is the best way of life man has ever known, and must be defended. By stepping back from the superintelligence narrative to one of a defence of our prosperous way of life, the AI companies can make their money simply by charging for the services they provide and and in return, we will continue to feed them our out-of-distribution ideas, wants, and wonder. It does not need to be this way.
Culture is becoming a dark forest "The future of intellectual work is to be crouched behind a tree, frantically trying to complete your contribution as silently as possible. You’ll feel the pressure of being hunted, since all it takes is a prompt to produce an almost-as-good version of what you’re attempting to make great, and so to mine away the inspiration and insight and reward. Quite often, staggering successes are erected in the forest, but they are never done collaboratively or in the open. You’ll never see anything being built anymore. Instead you’ll find the results at dawn, a gleaming sculpture in a glade, of unclear origin, and with features brutally beautiful. And then once the sparkle fades everyone will rush back to their respective trees, to their fumbling amid the loam, to their slick-wet roots, to their dark." open.substack.com/pub/erikho…
7
11
1
68
6,423
I am baffled by why journalists are treating the ">10% risk of human extinction" as a novel claim worthy of expansive reporting. There is nothing new here, and no new "evidence" for this evidence-free claim.
55
118
16
588
40,890
Marc Lluís retweeted
Remei de Can Barça.
34
533
80
2,154
195,009
Multistep abstraction may be a core property of how LLMs represent relational information, closely paralleling accounts of human cognitive maps used for navigating the social world osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/73…
9
1
47
2,252
Hostia tu quantes tonteries. xitter.cf/edugaresp/status/20957…
Replying to @edugaresp
4/ 🧠 NEUROCIENCIA. Los experimentos de Libet (y sus réplicas modernas) muestran que la actividad cerebral relacionada con una decisión ocurre ANTES de que la persona sea consciente de haber decidido. No somos agentes 100% racionales y autónomos. Nuestra subconsciencia nos gobierna más de lo que creemos.
1
2
145
Damasio. 2026. Si no sabeu d'un tema, no en parleu.
1
73
Replying to @edugaresp
6/ 🧠 Daniel Kahneman (Nobel de Economía) identificó dos sistemas de pensamiento: uno rápido e intuitivo (atajos, emociones) y otro lento y analítico. La mayoría de nuestras decisiones cotidianas son del primero. No comparamos precios racionalmente en el súper: usamos atajos automáticos.
1
69