Hey @claudeai @ClaudeDevs!
Could you maybe add a simple "keep all given permissions" to the compaction prompt? It would help a lot if agents could remember how and what they were allowed to do after being lobotomized 🙈
(I can't put all the temporary grants into the config every single time...)
(@lydiahallie sorry for the ping, taking all the chances 😅)
Automated compaction after time is a really bad idea, especially for long sessions! The compaction regularly summarizes things in an overly generalistic way, repeatedly causing huge issues for me!
Please make it optional. Seriously! I can't update otherwise. (Happy to help with the compaction issues if needed)
@claudeai @ClaudeDevs
Claude Code 2.1.299 has been released.
190 CLI changes, 1 system prompt change
Highlights:
• Added --disallow-tools to claude plugin eval to block specified built-in tools during runs and avoid tool bias
• Model accepts security-testing/dual-use prompts and uses AskUserQuestion to clarify, so they are not refused
• Idle compaction compacts chats over 200K tokens after ≈54m idle, preventing full reprocessing on resume
Full details are in thread below
Not sure what's going on today @ClaudeDevs ... Opus 5.5 (high) needs a lot of hand holding today.
"Yes, sorry, that was unclear. Nothing is running. The work on your device only starts from your own messages, and I can't start it myself. So the next step is waiting for you, and you can choose between two: ..."
Stopped multiple times today, in between steps, where it would run right through usually. Simply summarizing the step and then... nothing. Unmotivated.
Crazy, how it takes 2 weeks to remove my mail address from a marketing mailing list, while it took less than 10 minutes to update my mail address to make sure I don't miss any of your marketing mails. @Uber_Support
I've now set up a forwarding rule for these, to your own data protection officer. Let's see how they like your GDPR violations.
Gute Reise, Altparteien. #WirVerlassenX
Definitiv beste Taktik, Finger in die Ohren, laut "lalalala" singen und die Kritik der Bevölkerung einfach ausblenden. Was man nicht hört, existiert auch nicht.
Aber ihr kommt eh wieder zurück. Weil man ja schließlich nicht damit aufhören kann, den Bürgern die eigene Politik zu erklären, weil sie es sonst nicht verstehen.
Nennen wir es also einfach Urlaub.
Flo retweeted
Von wegen Schutz von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Merz lässt die Katze aus dem Sack: „Ich möchte Klarnamen im Internet sehen und wissen, wer sich zu Wort meldet.“
Moin @DHLPaket! Ich glaube, bei eurem "Paketlieferant nimmt Pakete und Rücksendungen gleich mit"-Service ist ein Fehler im Ablauf... Eben habe ich 2 Pakete abgegeben, dabei wurden die QR-Codes in der Mail gescannt und ich habe den Einlieferungsbeleg erhalten. Was die beiden Pakete angeht... nunja, die haben jetzt weder Paketschein, noch Tracking-Aufkleber. 🤣
Mehr Details gibts per PM.
Da bleibt einem die Spucke weg! 1984 lässt grüßen!
Ein deutsches Gericht will X dazu zwingen, alle Live-Daten zwei berüchtigt-bekannten Organisationen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Unbegrenzt.
Mit diesen Daten könnte man problemlos tausende neue "Ziele" für Durchsuchungsbeschlüsse "ermitteln".
X is challenging a decision from a judge in the Berlin Regional Court that egregiously undermines our fundamental right to due process and threatens the privacy rights and free speech of our users.
Two organizations, Democracy Reporting International and Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, have brought proceedings against X to get unrestricted access to X’s real-time data about all user posts on the platform for a supposed research project in advance of the German election.
Without giving X any opportunity to respond or comment on the suit, and notwithstanding that the application lacked crucial information, a court has ordered X to provide the organizations with unrestricted access to this data, in flagrant violation of our constitutionally guaranteed right to be heard.
That alone is reason enough for the decision to be set aside. Worse, however, it also transpires that the sole judge in this case previously worked for Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, the organization funding the research project, and alongside the lawyers (still employed by Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte) who are representing the applicants. The judge’s failure to recuse himself or, at the very least, to disclose these significant links raises serious concerns about the impartiality of the decision.
X believes this ruling violates fundamental rights to due process that are guaranteed by the German Constitution. X is committed to defending these rights through the legal system and will not back down in the face of injustice.
Flo retweeted
X is challenging a decision from a judge in the Berlin Regional Court that egregiously undermines our fundamental right to due process and threatens the privacy rights and free speech of our users.
Two organizations, Democracy Reporting International and Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, have brought proceedings against X to get unrestricted access to X’s real-time data about all user posts on the platform for a supposed research project in advance of the German election.
Without giving X any opportunity to respond or comment on the suit, and notwithstanding that the application lacked crucial information, a court has ordered X to provide the organizations with unrestricted access to this data, in flagrant violation of our constitutionally guaranteed right to be heard.
That alone is reason enough for the decision to be set aside. Worse, however, it also transpires that the sole judge in this case previously worked for Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, the organization funding the research project, and alongside the lawyers (still employed by Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte) who are representing the applicants. The judge’s failure to recuse himself or, at the very least, to disclose these significant links raises serious concerns about the impartiality of the decision.
X believes this ruling violates fundamental rights to due process that are guaranteed by the German Constitution. X is committed to defending these rights through the legal system and will not back down in the face of injustice.
Never thought a US-Company would take on the fight with us against our own government.
Otherwise we'd live in a pretty dark place right now.
Germany submits the highest number of legal demands for user data to X within the European Union, with ~87% of these requests targeting speech-related offenses. X believes that these legal demands for user data are unlawful and has taken cases in both German federal and state courts challenging the lawfulness of the government's overreach into our users’ privacy and freedom of expression.
Ich bin Demokrat. Deswegen lehne ich die Grünen konsequent ab. Und du?
Allerdings schreie ich nicht dauernd nach einem Verbot, nur weil mir deren Inhalte nicht gefallen. Eine Demokratie ohne echte Opposition ist keine Demokratie.