max blunt (@maxblunt) header
max blunt (@maxblunt) profile picture

Anti war, anti genocide, anti corporate. #PTSD

Joined April 2013
Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)Photo by max blunt (@maxblunt)
«En su país miserable, ¿acaso no tienen ni siquiera con qué alimentar a sus hijos?» — así intentaron unos periodistas estadounidenses humillar públicamente a una boxeadora soviética de 14 años; su respuesta, sin embargo, pasaría a la historia. Era el apogeo de la Guerra Fría. Durante un torneo juvenil internacional, un grupo de reporteros occidentales decidió someter a una frágil campeona de 14 años, proveniente de la URSS, a una calculada prueba psicológica. Aprovechando que tenían ante sí a una niña, la bombardearon sin pudor con las preguntas más viles y cínicas, con la intención de ridiculizar públicamente al deporte soviético y hacer estallar en llanto a la joven. Con una sonrisa maliciosa, un periodista estadounidense preguntó —lo suficientemente alto como para que toda la sala lo oyera— sobre su modesto equipamiento y la escasez de alimentos en la Unión Soviética: «Señorita, mire a sus rivales occidentales: lucen radiantes, visten uniformes de marcas costosas y entrenan con los mejores preparadores. Usted, en cambio, parece una huérfana pálida y hambrienta. ¿Acaso en su país empobrecido no alimentan a los niños con otra cosa que no sea serrín, dado que no pueden permitirse comida adecuada y se ve tan demacrada? ¿Ha visto alguna vez carne de verdad en su vida, o es que en la URSS la gente se dedica al boxeo simplemente por hambre?». Una carcajada burlona estalló en la delegación estadounidense. Los periodistas, olfateando un espectáculo, prepararon sus cámaras para un primer plano, esperando que la joven se derrumbara en lágrimas, indefensa y humillada ante los ojos del mundo. Pero la atleta soviética ni siquiera se inmutó. Acercó lentamente el micrófono, recorrió la sala con una mirada gélida y madura, y, con un tono absolutamente frío, pronunció solo dos frases. Sus palabras asestaron un golpe devastador a toda la maquinaria propagandística estadounidense: las sonrisas se borraron de los rostros de los extranjeros en un abrir y cerrar de ojos, el descarado reportero se quedó sin habla al instante y, al día siguiente, su declaración ocupaba las portadas de todos los periódicos de Estados Unidos. La joven atleta soviética miró al reportero estadounidense directamente a los ojos y, hablando con claridad ante el micrófono, declaró: «Mis oponentes suben al ring por el dinero de sus ricos patrocinadores y por la publicidad llamativa; por eso les preocupa tanto su indumentaria. Yo, en cambio, estoy aquí gracias a mi propio carácter, a mi arduo trabajo y al país que forjó mi fortaleza espiritual, sin pedir nada a cambio. No les vencemos con la abundancia de sus hamburguesas, sino con la fuerza de nuestros golpes; y cuando subimos al podio, los jueces miran nuestras medallas de oro, no sus rostros bien alimentados». La insolencia del estadounidense se evaporó en un instante. El refinado reportero, que apenas unos momentos antes sonreía con sorna ante las cámaras, perdió toda su arrogancia, se puso intensamente rojo y, presa de la cobardía, bajó la mirada. Abrió la boca para replicar, pero no encontró palabras bajo la intensa y gélida mirada de la joven de catorce años. El salón entero quedó sumido en un silencio atónito, impresionado por su firme seguridad, hasta que uno de los periodistas europeos lanzó un silbido de respeto y comenzó a aplaudir. Durante el resto de la conferencia de prensa, toda la delegación estadounidense permaneció en un silencio absoluto y abatido, sin atreverse siquiera a dirigir una mirada hacia el equipo soviético. Ante los ojos de los medios de comunicación de todo el mundo, esta joven había desmantelado, ella sola, la arrogante propaganda de Estados Unidos, defendiendo el honor de millones de ciudadanos soviéticos y dejando claro algo fundamental: el espíritu y el orgullo de una persona soviética no pueden comprarse con ninguna cantidad de dólares. La mismísima URSS. Vía VK. Gracias a Vladimir Elin.
223
1,327
37
6,935
276,109
max blunt retweeted
They Want To Use AI To Re-Centralize Control Of Information "It’s becoming clearer and clearer to everyone that these new technologies are not intended to improve the lives of ordinary people, but to serve the interests of the oligarchs and empire managers who rule our world."
85
2,029
92
3,785
45,255
max blunt retweeted
BREAKING: A coalition of Jewish groups have published an open letter to the @BoardofDeputies which accuses them of Genocide denial - the final phase of Genocide. It follows the Board's attack on the Green Party and also cites their complaints against the government's mild criticism of Israel and halt of some arms sales. Signed by 260 Jewish people, it accuses the Board of complicity in Genocide through its denial of Israel's war crimes.
73
582
37
1,071
32,507
max blunt retweeted
🚨BREAKING The Financial Times has just revealed that Thames Water’s US hedge fund creditors are close to agreeing a ‘last and final’ deal to take over the company. A handover to US hedge funds. A continuation of the privatised chaos. And a huge reward for the people who have run our water into the ground. The deal would see them allowed to pollute our rivers and seas without consequence - in exchange for an upfront payoff. This deal is absolutely outrageous, in every regard. 112 MPs have already called for special administration of Thames Water. A cross-party group of MPs - who scrutinise the Environment Department - have said that the creditors’ proposal should be rejected and Thames Water should be brought into special administration. And the former Environment Secretary rejected a previous version of the creditors’ deal in June. This new version is not better in any way. @andyburnham promised to reverse Thatcher’s legacy of privatisation. He promised public control of life’s essentials. This really is the moment of truth for Andy Burnham. If he allows the water supply of 16 million people to be sold off to US hedge funds - how can we take him seriously about any of his promises? NO DEAL to the Thames Water creditors. Special administration now.
40
564
68
1,182
77,490
max blunt retweeted
Mahmood is taking the hostile environment to dark places. This is what happens when a political project refuses to do the hard but progressive things that will improve people's material circumstances. All that's left are bans and crackdowns and micro-fixes to game algorithms and mollify the right-wing press. You've got to look like you're doing SOMETHING, after all.
3
194
7
326
4,862
Really? You could start by making it legal to protest genocide in the UK.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza is getting worse. Heavy rain. Flooded tents. The reality on the ground is heartbreaking. The UK government will not stand by. We will not rest until we bring an end to the intolerable suffering.
238
1,278
20
4,319
33,288
Very thought-provoking argument by Louis-Vincent Gave @gave_vincent, co-founder and CEO of Gavekal (one of the most respected macro research firms on China). His argument - which is correct - is that one of the The biggest problem for Western governments today (be it France, the UK, the US) is the rapidly rising cost of funding their debt. He says that governments have 3 broad ways to get it under control: 1) Austerity, cutting spending massively, which basically no politician wants to do because it makes you massively unpopular 2) Specific to the US, they could dramatically reduce AI data center spending, which soaks up a huge share of the world’s capital and pushes up borrowing costs for everyone, governments included. Not good either since it kills the AI boom. 3) Or, they can go back to embracing China, which he calls "the one deflationary force in the world today." He says it's by far the easiest path, and policymakers always take the easiest path. Louis-Vincent argues that's exactly what Mark Carney (“the least dumb of the western leaders today,” in Gave’s words) did when he opened Canada to Chinese cars: it's a cheap and easy way to fight inflation, and to reduce the cost of funding Canada’s debt in the process. It's fairly ironic when you think about it: you can actually find plenty of quotes by Western officials castigating China for "exporting deflation" (like Klaas Knot from the European Central Bank here: en.protothema.gr/2024/12/30/…). Louis-Vincent’s argument is basically that, sooner or later, folks in Western finance ministries are going to look at bond yields, then at the inflation numbers, then at all those speeches about China exporting deflation, and go like: "wait a minute..." 😏 Full video of Louis-Vincent’s interview here: youtube.com/watch?v=kT_cV_Wa…
124
412
57
2,114
174,716
The funniest - and frankly, saddest - aspect of this is that we’ve gone so long without a government that can actually do long-term planning and succeed that we now resort to othering it by calling it "authoritarian". Which, when you think about it, makes the problem self-perpetuating: if competence and effectiveness are now branded "authoritarian", we're making it into something that’s incompatible with our "democratic values". And, by the way, I read the paper: what they actually describe is long-term planning, coordination between ministries, stable policy, patient financing, local experimentation and fierce market-driven competition. It genuinely reads like a manual for good governance that Western governments should be studying instead of slapping a scary label on.
New article! The political economy of China’s electric vehicle transition: eco-authoritarianism and policy durability by James Jackson & Mathias Larsen. @James7jackson @MLundLarsen doi.org/10.1080/09644016.202…
40
147
11
713
21,998
max blunt retweeted
It's important this performative video is met with the scorn that it deserves. Silence would be unacceptable. But it's actually worse to have Labour making sad videos whilst continuing to arm a genocide and arrest those who protest. It should be beneath contempt.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza is getting worse. Heavy rain. Flooded tents. The reality on the ground is heartbreaking. The UK government will not stand by. We will not rest until we bring an end to the intolerable suffering.
189
2,189
33
6,697
53,946
max blunt retweeted
Only a British journalist could be this astonished that the public considers a country that has bombed, invaded or attempted to overthrow governments in at least 70 countries since 1945 a threat to world peace.
Former US Chargé d'affaires to the UK Philip T. Reeker tells @MarkUrban01 a new survey finding 74 percent of people see the US as a serious threat to world peace is an "important moment" to reflect on the UK-US relationship. trib.al/nzSSueb 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602
15
294
1,669
34,662
Disgusting.
NEW: Andy Burnham has appointed a controversial firm involved in Donald Trump's 'Gaza riviera' proposal to draft up his 10-year plan
167
1,624
20
9,069
104,199
max blunt retweeted
Andy Burnham has appointed these US consultants to draw up his 10 Year Plan, hot on the heels of the same company drawing up a Gaza ethnic cleansing plan for Trump. Mandelson moment for Burnham ft.com/content/c0e661cc-55db…
44
353
20
711
12,929
max blunt retweeted
Burnham selling off the things that Thatcher wouldnt have dared to touch. Hell, even Boris Johnson wouldnt touch.
Privatisation of British Library: To be asset stripped, destroyed like water companies & Royal Mail: BL management will close reading rooms, converting them into paid, private spaces operated by commercial company. They propose outsourcing in-house security. Stop this rip-off.
35
883
10
4,693
82,583
When I posted yesterday about Andy Burnham’s political machine secretly intercepting public emails to protect his Abu Dhabi property deals, my inbox was flooded by people thanking me for finally calling out what goes on in Manchester. Well, I woke up this morning and looked at the latest financial disclosures coming out of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, and the rabbit hole just got so much darker. Burnham's authority has been caught funnelling nearly £1,000,000 of taxpayer money to completely anonymous beneficiaries in a series of secret payments. They paid out £83,000 in rent to a hidden landlord. They handed out thousands in anonymous "consultancy fees." Worst of all, they gave a £210,000 capital grant to a property developer and completely redacted the name from the public ledger. When journalists finally confronted them, the authority claimed hiding the £210,000 developer payout was just a "human error" and blamed the rest of the secrecy on data protection laws. Look at the terrifying double standard at play here. If a working citizen misfiles a tax return by fifty pounds or makes a mistake on a local form, the state will investigate their entire life, apply ruthless penalty fines, and threaten them with court. But when Burnham's regional authority hands a fifth of a million pounds of public cash to an anonymous property developer, they simply shrug and call it a clerical typo. This is exactly how the modern British political cartel operates. They use the language of bureaucracy and data protection as a legal shield to funnel public wealth to private, hidden corporate interests. I am sorry, but they are not governing a city. They are running a shadow ledger with your money, and they are terrified of the public finding out who is actually cashing the checks.
496
5,321
404
11,262
233,376
Andy Burnham has appointed the US consultancy giant BCG into the heart of Downing Street to draw up his 10 Year Plan for the country. Last year they worked with Donald Trump on his plan for a 'Gaza riviera' to permanently ethnically cleanse Gaza. There are no words.
173
2,674
115
5,754
75,325
I read the reports coming out of Manchester this morning and I am genuinely speechless. Andy Burnham’s old political machine has just been caught secretly intercepting and censoring emails sent by the public to elected politicians. What were those emails actually about? A resident was asking hard questions about the £55 million in taxpayer loans Burnham handed to Abu Dhabi property developers when he was Mayor, with zero affordable housing requirements. Instead of letting elected councillors read the concerns of their constituents, unelected bureaucrats quietly diverted the emails straight to the legal department to be buried. The politicians had absolutely no idea their personal inboxes were being filtered by the state. The council claims they had to intercept the messages because of potential litigation. It is a complete lie. Internal correspondence proves the city solicitor asked for this specific resident to be blocked months before any legal threat even existed. You vote for local representatives to hold the system accountable. But the second a citizen asks where Burnham sent public money in a Gulf state property deal, his political syndicate builds a secret digital firewall to protect the investment. This is not a functioning democracy. This is a captured corporate cartel running a cover-up for the Prime Minister, and the national media is letting them get away with it in broad daylight.
500
5,506
411
10,596
380,782
max blunt retweeted
The President of the United States posted this, and anyone who thinks this is normal needs to give their head a wobble. These posts will be archived, and historians will look back on them and say wtf.
237
1,504
90
14,908
719,242
max blunt retweeted
This is just so, so, so bleak. The development of big chunks of Burnham's much vaunted Ten Year Plan have been outsourced to the Boston Consulting Group, one of the world's three biggest management consultancies. Most recently, BCG was revealed to be a contractor in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation - the wretched private organisation that was created to deliver aid to Gaza after the destruction of UNWRA. You may remember the scenes of starving Gazans flooding into gated pens to get food, with civilians repeatedly sniped by the IDF. BCG were paid $1m/ month for their consulting work. BCG also received $4m for Project Aurora - a plan for a reconstruction plan for Gaza. The plan included costing giving Gazans $9000 to leave the territory. How is the government even considering contracting BCG considering this? But BCG also partners with the world's biggest private equity firms. It is a massive, massive AI booster. It closely advises MBS in Saudi Arabia on its economic plans. It is, in other words, precisely the sort of late-capitalist horror show that should have no role in helping a nominally socialist Party develop a 10-year development plan. There is already so much worrying briefing on this plan, about how half-baked and thin it threatens to be. Now we know big parts are being outsourced to BCG, the more pressing concern is that it'll be some Tony Blair Institute-style neo-liberal spiel about the potential of tech and the need to liberate the market.
94
1,134
73
1,955
54,194
I am in a long line of antizionist Jews who political opponents try to make people hate. But I wont be quiet, not on criticism of Israel, nor on tackling the extreme wealth and poverty pay that both the Tories and now Labour have overseen in office.
🇬🇧 “Is it now the Labour position that a genocide is not racist?” Green Party leader Zack Polanski confronted Conservative and Labour politicians at the London Assembly on Thursday after Conservative Susan Hall introduced a motion condemning the Greens’ decision to define Zionism as racism. Hall called the Green Party’s position “abhorrent” and argued it threatened Jewish Londoners. Polanski, who is Jewish, accused Hall of weaponizing antisemitism and challenged Labour members over their government’s continued military support for Israel amid the genocide in Gaza. The Assembly passed Hall’s motion 19–3, with just the three Green members voting against it.
597
2,178
57
8,617
259,483
max blunt retweeted
I haven't had a chance to read this BBC article until now as I've been busy all day, but allegations of government doom-mongering aside, I am a bit of a civil defence/resilience nerd. A few things caught my eye: "An example of this is the new communication system being adopted by the emergency services, which will replace radio comms with mobile phone network technology, says Lord Harris, 'so if the mobile phone goes down it will also impact on emergency services communications'." The system the Beeb is referring to here is ESN (Emergency Services Network - known within policing as "ESWhen?"), which is supposed to be replacing the old system, Airwave. I used Airwave in a previous life, and even back then we were being told ESN was imminently coming (it's currently nine years late). But I digress… ESN is built on EE Business commercial 4G/5G mobile infrastructure, whereas Airwave uses dedicated TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio) technology, which is seen as outdated. Which do you think will be the more reliable option in an emergency? Well, the one we’re getting rid of, of course. In essence, if 4G/5G were to go down post-ESN rollout (whenever that happens), the emergency services would lose all ability to communicate effectively and quickly. Madness. "The current urgency for disaster planning is coming at an interesting moment for technology we used to rely on. The UK's copper wire landline system - which would work even in a power cut - will be switched off on 31 January 2027." Why are we ditching the copper wire landline system? It clearly serves a purpose in the event of failure of other systems. I keep saying that analogue systems work when digital systems fail. Cash works when cards don't. Landline telephones work when mobile phones are down (assuming it's not a power issue). Many such examples. Why on earth are we ditching a reliable system - one which can withstand even a power cut - like the copper wire landline? "The future of FM radio is also under government review." Again, why?! We've already ditched long wave (in June of this year, when BBC Radio 4's long wave service on 198 kHz officially ceased transmissions). We know that FM will work when DAB and internet radio don't. During the post-Cold War optimism of the 1990s and 2000s, we dismantled pretty much our entire civil defence/contingency infrastructure in Britain - a terrible decision in hindsight. But we know that the legacy analogue systems we still have (such as copper wire telephone systems and FM radio) will still serve us well when all our exciting modern technology fails us. So why in God's name are we getting rid of these systems? I often think about public warning systems. When we dismantled all our civil defence infrastructure, we physically removed our air raid sirens (alongside leaving bunkers to rot, among other things). But that's not a problem, right? Because now we have the "Emergency Alerts" system (which I, perhaps controversially, support - if it's not misused by the state). But that, much like the new ESN, will only work if 4G/5G works! We have myriad professionals working within the civil contingencies and preparedness arena in government - why is, as it seems, nobody thinking of this stuff?
116
513
46
2,655
216,833