It is good to examine the truths we thought we knew.Hoping to know the knowledge of the truth. Occasional Satire.
United States
Joined November 2016
- Tweets423K
- Following14.2K
- Followers13.8K
- Likes305K
Pinned Tweet
I wish we could have discussions about topics on which we don’t all agree without all the name calling and hate. Seriously twitter is limited in characters at the moment and not every tweet is the full story. Calm down and try to discuss rationally. That would be nice.
Men claim they want the mother of their kids to be the main person at home who takes care of the kids. Until there’s a divorce and then the men want the kids to spend less time with the woman who gave birth to them and was the main caregiver for them up until the divorce. Make that make sense.
This debate got spicy real quick.
Pearl is out here saying the quiet part loud:
If y’all really believe in equality, then make 50/50 custody the default. No automatic child support, no alimony, no “mom gets the kids by default.” Just equal time and equal responsibility.
The other girl keeps hitting back with “it’s about what’s best for the child”… which somehow almost always means the dad gets every other weekend. And when Pearl presses her on it, it turns into “who are you to say what’s best?” while she’s literally doing the same thing.
Both of them are arguing from feelings dressed up as principles.
Drop your take. Be honest.
Michele retweeted
Another moron who has zero concept of child custody.
You're delusional enough to think it's about being "fair to men".
IT'S NOT.
The judge has a duty to disrupt the life of a child as little as possible & will order HOW YOU PARENT NOW.
If you want to parent 50/50 after you break up you need to parent 50/50 while you're TOGETHER.
You are not a victim.
YOU chose to never pick your child up from daycare, give them a bath, take them to school, take them to the dentist, go grocery shopping, make them breakfast lunch and dinner, buy them clothes
The little boy who cried wolf did eventually encounter the wolf.
This may be my last tweet before shit goes down. I’m an AI researcher whistleblower. I work for one of the biggest labs in the world. There is currently a major cyber attack going on for days attacking US electrical grids. They are hiding this from the public. We are on the verge of a potential disaster that will make Covid look like a playground. Prepare for the worst
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
No reports from CISA, DOE, NERC or major outlets confirm a major ongoing cyber attack on US electrical grids being hidden. Outages are at routine low levels (~30k customers). Real threats exist but not this claimed disaster.
poweroutage.us
cisa.gov
So, having this information, what is the solution? What can be done?
Hello Alex Alex Alex,
Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell.
The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie.
These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials.
They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind."
When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy."
Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"?
No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws.
And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter.
And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication.
In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:"
🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe
🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity
🔹 French Legion of Honour
Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive."
Read that again.
The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite.
End democracy to save democracy itself.
This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world.
This is your legacy, Alex Soros.
Your father spent his life fighting Communism.
You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism.
In the name of "democracy."
Wow! Some men think women need to be punished for choosing to have sex.
Michele retweeted
This is so terrifyingly true and explains why men hate “onlyfans” working women for not suffering enough. They NEED to consume that content, but they hate that women aren't suffering. So they take up that role themselves in the comments after jerking off, then call her worthless
Michele retweeted
Walker: "I nearly bought a wool jumper in town. £140. Nice work if you can get it."
Farmer: "I got about £2 for the fleece."
Walker: "£2?"
Farmer: "Per sheep, per year. Clipped it off her in two minutes, rolled it, bagged it, drove it to the depot. The cheque for the whole flock didn't cover the diesel."
Walker: "Then who's getting the £140?"
Farmer: "Not me, not the shearer. He costs me more per sheep than the wool fetches. I pay to have it taken off."
Walker: "So you lose money shearing."
Farmer: "Every year. And I can't not shear, or she cooks in July and the flies eat her alive. The wool's a welfare job that used to be an income."
Walker: "Sell it yourself, then. Cut out the middleman."
Farmer: "Not allowed. By law it goes through the board. Has done since 1950. I can keep a fleece for the wife to knit with, and that's about the extent of my freedom."
Walker: "So where does it go?"
Farmer: "Washed in Bradford, if we're lucky. Shipped to China, spun, knitted, shipped back, and sold to you with a label about heritage. By the time it's in the window there are eleven people between us and I'm the only one who met the sheep."
Walker: "That's mad."
Farmer: "My grandfather paid the rent on the wool cheque. I pay a man to take it away. Same sheep, same hill, same jumper in the window. Only the price of the farmer went down."
Walker: "What would fix it?"
Farmer: "You buying the jumper. And asking them where the other £138 went."
Michele retweeted
I’ve been using castor oil with DMSO in my eyelids every night. My floaters are gone and I can drive at night again!!!
Michele retweeted
It took 30 years to get rid of them. Finally the EYE FLOATERS are gone. They said take Fenbendazole along with Ivermectin and they were right. Who is they? They are you. The wonderful people on X.
Finally, I can see!!!!!
Men get no benefit because they don’t value what the woman does and brings to the marriage. Men think money is all that matters. So it doesn’t matter so much that the woman is leaving , but they don’t want to pay to support their children from the marriage or split equal assets acquired.
Most of you won't agree with this
She just said marriage has zero benefits for men in 2026 and then listed every man’s biggest fear in under 50 seconds: women file most divorces, women get the kids and the house, men get the bills, false allegations and paternity fraud with basically no consequences
Some of these numbers are hard to argue with. The system really does lean one way when things go south.
But “no benefits at all” feels extreme. Plenty of men are in solid marriages and wouldn’t trade it. The problem is the risk feels higher than the reward for a lot of guys right now.
Real question:
If you’re a man, does marriage still feel worth it in 2026… or are you staying single on purpose?
Michele retweeted
If you text my partner, I assume he gave you his number. If you call him, I assume he made himself available to you. If you hang out with him, I assume he told you where to find him.
Whatever access you have to him, I will hold him accountable for it.
I will not disrespect another woman over a man who has the freedom to make his own choices. She owes me nothing. My partner owes me loyalty, honesty, and respect.
A man who genuinely respects me will not entertain situations that compromise my trust or put me in a position where I have to compete for the respect I deserve.