All very true
The recent Starlink / Starshield incident in Ukraine has created a dangerous precedence for the US export industry, many haven't yet grasped. The sudden deactivation respectively curtailing of those systems without warning not only cost precious lives, but also equipment worth millions.
Though the blame game between the White House (Trump) and SpaceX (Musk) is going on, ultimately it doesn't matter. It showed the world that the USA are not a reliable partner any more. Pointing at some obscure "violation of terms of services" without providing the exact passage are just increasing that notion that this was a political move.
The explanation that Starlink must not be used for "offensive" means is nonsense, too. Starlink has never been turned on over Russia, and using it in Ukraine is by definition defensive in nature. You can even argue that hitting Russian targets in Russia is defensive, since you don't have to wait for an attack to be conducted. Even the intention is enough to warrant action and to eliminate the threat at the source. But this is a different topic.
Furthermore, SpaceX has been fully aware that its Starlink terminals are being used by Ukrainian forces. Especially when considering that Ukraine only recently had to white-list their Starlink terminals for the Ukrainian military so that Russian forces, who have been abundantly using Starlink as well, were locked out. It has always been clear that those Starlink terminals are used for and by the Ukrainian military, and Ukraine has always been thankful for that.
Coming up with this bogus story, now, three weeks before midterms is therefore as transparent as it is shameless. It is obvious for everyone that this was just figleaf statement so that a political agenda can be pushed, an agenda which runs counter to the strategic nationalist interests of the USA, both political and economic.
And this is the real scandal. It is not new that the US had to lock out its technology or supplies to nations with which it had previously good and even cordial relation. Iran under the Shah, South-Vietnam and Cuba before Castro are just three to name it. But as you can see from them, it made perfectly sense back then. Those nations switched sides or disappeared altogether.
Ukraine on the other hand didn't switch sides and even helped the US in the most recent and botched Iran war, despite being short on ammunition itself. The Ukrainian government accepted every possible compromise and offered an unconditional ceasefire from the start. Russia on the hand refused all of it and is demanding surrender. Yet, it gets this treatment? Unbelievable.
This will be noted by all clients around the globe who purchase US weapons and technology. If agreements are not honored and can unilaterally and even clandestinely be altered based on the whims of a few, who only follow their own motives or election lies, then the all concept reliability falls apart.
Whether it is Starlink, the F-35, Tomahawk missiles or HIMARS. All those systems run on software and in many cases can only properly operate with recent updates. You don't even need have a kill switch. You can only refuse to update and many of those systems lose more than 90% of their effectiveness within a short period, making worthless.
This is why we see the blame game between Musk and Trump. I'm sure that people around those guys told them how absolutely shortsighted and stupid this step was. It will fall back on the entire US industry. Not even those two guys are worth that losses and backlash. A functional US Congress would immediately start subpoenas and hearings, asking questions in order to mitigate the damage, but here we are.
Trump and Musk have given the best reason why not to buy American. Customers - governmental and private alike - around the globe will take note of this and act accordingly, and I wouldn't be surprised if this won't be limited to US military products only. An absolutely senseless and avoidable own goal.
michele lenza retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
michele lenza retweeted
Today, the people of Serbia turned out in record numbers to shape their country’s future.
Congratulations to the Student List on its victory in the parliamentary elections.
We stand ready to support reforms on the rule of law, media freedom, the fight against corruption and strong democratic institutions, and to work together to advance Serbia’s future in the European Union.
@eucopresident
michele lenza retweeted
Grande affluenza per il nostro incontro su “Il Declino Italiano”. C’era così tanta gente rimasta fuori che abbiamo dovuto fare il bis😂
É il tema dei temi. Parlarne più diffusamente può essere utile a spostare l’attenzione dalla mera redistribuzione alle leve della crescita. 👇
Ultimo dialogo de lavoce.info al #FIE26 per continuare i nostri approfondimenti sul declino italiano. È mito o realtà? @monacelt @RiccardoTrezzi Guido Ascari @Tboeri hanno provato a rispondere, illustrando diversi aspetti e numeri significativi.
michele lenza retweeted
Musk’s Starlink is like Schroedinger’ cat: both on and off, both public and private, both under Musk’s and Trump’s authority.
According to The Economist:
"It appears to have come from a small circle around the president, Mr Musk and Steve Witkoff, the special envoy to Russia. Reports suggest Mr Musk wanted to punish Ukraine for striking Russian refineries. One official says he contacted the White House only after imposing the restrictions."
If true, this suggests Elon Musk imposed the terminal-speed restrictions unilaterally, before notifying the White House.
Congress must urgently investigate whether Musk acted without government authorization. It is unacceptable for a private citizen to exercise unilateral control over a vital military capability. Starshield is a defense system, and decisions to restrict its operational capabilities should rest with the appropriate government authorities, not the CEO of a private contractor.
This should alarm everyone.
The America-Ukraine link grows even spottier economist.com/europe/2026/10…
michele lenza retweeted
Lezione eccezionale di @giov_peri oggi al @festinteconomia. Tema: i (grandi) benefici dell’immigrazione.
3 flash. Nei paesi OCSE:
1️⃣livello di istruzione degli immigrati é in media *superiore* a quello dei nativi
2️⃣I figli degli immigrati hanno tassi occupazione > nativi👇
michele lenza retweeted
3️⃣Ostilità a immigrazione é più forte nelle aree geografiche dove la quota di immigrati é *più bassa*.
Quando si vive a contatto con immigrati se ne vede il beneficio. Chi ne é lontano è schiavo della narrazione mediatica su immigrazione. (es: Ceuta)👇
michele lenza retweeted
Europe, or anyone else for that matter, would have to be mad to depend in anyway on Starlink for its defence.
Elon Musk ordered the slowdown of the military version of Starlink that Ukraine relies on, according to U.S. officials and people familiar with the matter who spoke to The Wall Street Journal. Musk wrote on X after it became public that “any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.” Trump told reporters Monday he didn’t know who was responsible, “but I would like to find out.”
The Journal reports Musk and Trump spoke by phone soon after the slowdown became public, according to two people, and one said they also discussed it before. Some U.S. officials told the Journal Musk acted unilaterally and Trump did not order retribution against Ukraine.
That conflicts with earlier reports. Reuters reported the order came from inside the White House, and The Telegraph reported Musk proposed it to Trump. A senior U.S. official told Reuters the president made no such request.
Source: wsj.com/world/ukraine-starli…
michele lenza retweeted
Why does this keep happening
It is a strange world.
Because 5.7 million people live in three small Baltic countries (whose total size is less than a Chinese Tier II city). and whose half of the population lives in Europe, and another third are Russians who cannot get citizenship, and because they have traumas and bad memories of the Soviet rule, the entire world of 8 billion people should go into a nuclear apocalypse and die.
michele lenza retweeted
This has been Putin's dream for years: That his country, with GDP per capita lower than Poland, unable to conquer Donbas since 2014, will be treated as an equal to the US and China.
wsj.com/world/russia/putin-f…
michele lenza retweeted
Vedendo l’Italia in fiamme il “filosofo” pro-Putin Dugin esalta le violenze: “Più caos c’è meglio è, via la Meloni”.
È lo stesso che era venuto in tour in Italia per spingere la nascita del governo giallo-verde tra Lega e Cinque Stelle. Chissà perché.
È ora di finirla con le ingerenze russe nella nostra politica interna e con i partiti italiani che fanno da megafono alla propaganda putiniana.
I disagi sociali che hanno portato alle proteste degli ultimi giorni non possono e non devono essere strumentalizzati da chi vorrebbe la fine dell’Ucraina.
E invece questo sta accadendo qui in Italia, con l’ideologia della falsa contrapposizione tra sostegno all’Ucraina e soldi in istruzione e sanità, e così in molti Paesi europei.
La Russia, ancora una volta, ci marcia sopra con la sua propaganda e il suo esercito di bot e guerra ibrida.
Who wants some infrastructure that can be shut down at the will of a foreigner? Are we really joking here?
michele lenza retweeted
Putin doesn’t want peace. Putin wants Ukraine. Enough is enough.
President Trump should rescind the diesel deal with Russia and use the Lindsey Graham Sanctioning Russia Act to impose harsh sanctions on nations purchasing Russian energy, work with our allies to ensure Ukraine has the military support it needs to repel and defeat this Russian invasion once and for all. Slava Ukraini🇺🇸🇺🇦
michele lenza retweeted
La cosa incredibile delle manifestazioni di questi giorni - per scuola e sanità all’altezza - é che avvengono dopo che il Paese ha speso **400 miliardi** per Superbonus e PNRR.
La catastrofica incapacità di impiegare le risorse: contro questo bisognerebbe manifestare a gran voce
michele lenza retweeted
The Nobel Prize for economics has been awarded to Robert E Hall and Michael Woodford, for their work on the 'microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic stabilisation'. Follow our live blog for more: ft.trib.al/sZ0k4IA
michele lenza retweeted
Breaking news: UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham has accused Moscow of meddling in the 2016 Brexit referendum and warns European voters of the Russian threat ft.trib.al/sLGisIp
michele lenza retweeted
No, lo siete voi collaborazionisti del macellaio. Se non potesse contare sulla vostra costante opera di erosione delle nostre democrazie, Putin avrebbe smesso da tempo di ammazzare. Provo profonda vergogna per l'abisso morale nel quale sguazzi felice
It would be a great moment to show what Europe truly stands for. I am sure we share the values that are being defended by Ukraine.
The betrayal of Ukraine by the US and the cowardice of the EU, choices that allow these attacks to continue, will forever be stains on the American and EU flags.
#StandWithUkraine️ #RussiaIsATerroristState
michele lenza retweeted
Throwback to the @ecb Annual Research Conference where Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman discussed Europe’s competitiveness, innovation & fragmentation in a changing global economy. Catch up on the ARC papers ecb.europa.eu/press/conferen… and watch the podcast 👇 youtu.be/nIcDcOXJKU0?si=kdkH…



































