hanalag vegan (@minimumharm) header
hanalag vegan (@minimumharm) profile picture

https://teapawt.net/t.co/F1dU0XJ160

Joined June 2023
Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)Photo by hanalag vegan (@minimumharm)
Only notable Talarico flaw is not vegan, contrary to popular slander. If he was vegan, it wouldnt be an insult or strike against him, rather a positive character trait & actions aligned w/ principles. He promoted plantbased food for the climate, but regularly exploits animals.
1
100
Ideally we make choices on whoever benefits everyone (all sentient beings), not just ourself. Looking beyond our own nose often works out better for us anyway, but that shouldn't be the extend of our goals.
1
1
25
I think if anything its unrepresentatively amplifying extreme voices from provax crowd, "nutpicking". Theres very reasonable provax positions, but sadistic devaluing of human life isn't one. I don't think most reading would agree, so it's more likely to make ppl hate pro-vax ppl
5
You legalcucks are wild. Things are not good or bad because of legality. Legality isn't morality. This attitude in discussion of laws changing is absurd. Slavery was legal. Animal exploitation is legal. Both bad. Same sex marriage was & often still is illegal. Totally fine.
47
No true scotsman fallacy & argumentum ad legum. Im not even trying to argue against what youre saying but your logic is just terrible. Things like child & animal exploitation arent wrong or right because theyre illegal or legal. Theyre wrong because they violate sentient beings.
3
88
So anything illegal is bad, anything legal is fine? Argumentum ad legum fallacy. Ur own logic eats itself as theyre making things illegal u dont think should be. I guess censorship isnt censorship if its of illegal things, & if csam was legal it'd be fine. Typical carnist mindset
1
31
Replying to @baselessassert
Tho I agree & its a good point (for each person regardless of circumstances they should still avoid using animals as much as they can), I found tons of soy or pea based enteral nutrition formulas due to prevalence of dairy allergies. We should seek out alternatives when possible.
2
123
Nice way to show your own privilege and ignorance by appropriating the situations of marginalized groups to justify oppression of other animals, humans and the environment alike ox.ac.uk/news/2021-11-11-sus…
11
197
Reminds me of book title "One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This". Same applied to transatlantic human slave trade; largely abolished for economic reasons (Capitalism & Slavery, '44) before most grew moral compass. & applies to animal exploitation today & in future.
1
18
Just saying the frog in boiling pot analogy is a myth; it was based on a frog who was literally lobotomized. Most frogs are smart & will jump out of the pot as soon as it gets too hot for them even if it's increased very slowly & gradually. Other animals are smart humans are dumb
2
122
Replying to @omnipaff @asheuriii
There's literally no hope for you
1
3
69
Being vegan can also have immediate benefits to quality of life, health & wellbeing. Not to mention there are plenty of vegan alternatives to animal products & tasty vegan food. Big disagree that animal products improve QOL anyhow. youtube.com/shorts/Fba3x4KRx…
2
21
Also compare to the sugar boycotts during human slavery abolition. People justified buying products they didnt need which brought them pleasure (like sugar) even though it supported human slavery. "Bruh the humans were already enslaved for it" yes but ur causing more to happen
1
14