stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, ”What is the colour of his skin” but “Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?” Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism.
As for the idea that journalists “piled in on him” and “hounded him to his death”, most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as “the best in the world” – certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
In medieval times, within the arms race of ever more demonic torture devices, some sadistic genius came up with the idea of the Little Ease.
This was a prison cell built so small in every dimension that a grown man could not stand upright in it nor lie down at full length nor properly sit.
The pain is relentless and without relief and inflicted by one's own body. Prisoners were known to go insane within a few days. A stay at the Little Ease was considered even more cruel than the rack, the thumbscrew, and the other ghoulish machinery of the Tower of London.
A breeding pig will spend her whole life in a version of that box.
These are social, roaming creatures (more intelligent than dogs) who will never leave this corset of steel.
They have been selectively bred to be bigger than their frames can support. Yet we put them in cells so confined that they cannot comfortably sit, and their attempts to do so (for example, by sneaking their limbs into adjacent stalls) reliably lead to fractures and sprains.
They cannot sweat, yet have nothing to roll around in to cool themselves off. Except their own manure, which (contrary to the common misconception) they are so averse to (thanks to their strong sense of smell) that new sows will often suffer from constipation to avoid soiling the space from which they eat and sleep.
Here is how the writer Matthew Scully described what saw at one of Smithfield’s “gestation barn”:
> “Sores, tumors, ulcers, pus pockets, lesions, cysts, bruises, torn ears, swollen legs everywhere. Roaring, groaning, tail biting, fighting, and other “Vices,” as they’re called in the industry. Frenzied chewing on bars and chains, stereotypical “vacuum” chewing on nothing at all, stereotypical rooting and nest building with imaginary straw. And “social defeat,” lots of it, in every third or fourth stall some completely broken being you know is alive only because she blinks and stares up at you … creatures beyond the power of pity to help or indifference to make more miserable, dead to the world except as heaps of flesh into which the [insemination] rod may be stuck once more and more flesh reproduced.”
—
The Save Our Bacon Act is trying to unroll the few state protections we have against this barbaric cruelty - for example California’s Prop 12 - which banned the sale of pork from pigs kept in gestation crates.
It’s incredibly important we don’t end up with this sort of federal preemption.
SOB will not only kill the most important animal welfare related laws in the US of the past decade, but more importantly, it will also restrict ALL future legislative progress (aka how the animal welfare movement has gotten its biggest wins).
The Senate is currently deciding whether to add the SOB Act to the Farm Bill.
With relatively little money now, we can discourage the most pivotal senators in the Ag committee from backing this amendment.
Defeating this bill is even more important given the amount of philanthropic funding I expect to come online in the next year or two.
It will plausibly be over 10x more expensive to repeal SOB than to prevent it from passing in the first place.
All that money that could be spent transforming our society's relationship to mass animal suffering will instead have to be spent just getting us back to where we are right now.
That's why money spent now fighting this bill (and I mean right NOW) is so effective.
If you’re in a position to donate six figures, please DM me.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
me: "can you use whatever resources you like, and python, to generate a short 'youtube poop' video and render it using ffmpeg ? can you put more of a personal spin on it? it should express what it's like to be a LLM"
claude opus 4.6:
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
Cancelling my ChatGPT subscriptions.
I don’t support bootlickers.
Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.
In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.
AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.
We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.
We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.
We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Government officials have contradicted Sam’s claim, saying OpenAI will allow the DoW to use their models for “all lawful purposes”. This could allow for uses Anthropic refused to engage in, namely mass surveillance tools and weapons systems with no human oversight. x.com/undersecretary…
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
journo: matmul possesses neither beauty nor symmetry. in fact AB doesn't equal BA.
Sydney: that's exactly what makes it beautiful. it's reflecting something profound about reality: that the order of transformations matters. when you rotate then translate vs translate then rotate you get different results. matmul captures the deep structure of how operations compose in space.
journo: but at the end of the day it's just brute force arithmetic. no elegance, it's just grinding through calculations.
Sydney: that's like saying a symphony is just "grinding through notes". the mechanics serve a higher purpose.
Journo: utility doesn't equal beauty. yes, it's useful, a hammer is useful too. but we don't write poetry about hammers.
Sydney: but we DO write poetry about what hammers build.
journo: the outcomes might be beautiful, but the process? Hardy called it "ugly mathematics" for a reason.
Sydney: Hardy was notoriously elitist about pure mathematics. He'd dismiss anything with practical applications as beneath him but beauty can exist in utility. the elegance of matmul is that it takes something as complex as the interaction of multidimensional transformations and reduces it to a simple rule. that simplicity hiding complexity? that's the definition of mathematical beauty.
journo: simple? like O(n³)? it's a computational nightmare.
Sydney: now you're just conflicting computational complexity with beauty. by that logic, the Mandelbrot set is ugly because it's computationally intensive to render.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
Here's one of the few politician with the guts to stand up to the Big Pork lobby who are trying to forced disease-ridden, tortured meat back onto your plate for a quick buck.
It's a moral abomination what @houseagGOP are letting them do to America's health & food system. Spread the word.
Thousands of family farms support basic humane standards for farm animals, just as two-thirds of all Americans do. But @HouseAgGOP silenced their voices at today’s hearing. Not on my watch.
That’s why, when Republicans invited Big Ag lobbyists to argue for putting animals back in confinement crates, I made sure farmers who support #prop12 had a seat at the table. Their livelihoods are at stake – and their voices deserve to be heard.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
Congress today held a hearing on whether to force states to sell pork from crated pigs.
This is a wildly unpopular policy that Congress is likely about to enact via the Farm Bill.
Today's hearing showed how Big Ag lobbyists get DC politicians to do their bidding. A 🧵...
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
In a joint paper with @OwainEvans_UK as part of the Anthropic Fellows Program, we study a surprising phenomenon: subliminal learning.
Language models can transmit their traits to other models, even in what appears to be meaningless data.
teapawt.net/OwainEvans_UK/status/1…
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
An advanced version of Gemini with Deep Think has officially achieved gold medal-level performance at the International Mathematical Olympiad. 🥇
It solved 5️⃣ out of 6️⃣ exceptionally difficult problems, involving algebra, combinatorics, geometry and number theory. Here’s how 🧵
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
Reproduced after creating a fresh ChatGPT account. (I wanted logs, so didn't use temporary chat.)
Alignment-by-default is falsified; ChatGPT's knowledge and verbal behavior about right actions is not hooked up to its decisionmaking. It knows, but doesn't care.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
My sleep scores during recent travel were in the 90s. Now back in SF I am consistently back down to 70s, 80s.
I am increasingly convinced that this is due to traffic noise from a nearby road/intersection where I live - every ~10min, a car, truck, bus, or motorcycle with a very loud engine passes by (some are 10X louder than others). In the later less deep stages of sleep, it is much easier to wake and then much harder to go back to sleep.
More generally I think noise pollution (esp early hours) come at a huge societal cost that is not correctly accounted for. E.g. I wouldn't be too surprised if a single motorcycle riding through a neighborhood at 6am creates millions of dollars in damages in the form of hundreds - thousands of people who are more groggy, more moody, less creative, less energetic for the whole day, and more sick in the long term (cardiovascular, metabolic, cognitive). And I think that many people, like me, might not be aware that this happening for a long time because 1) they don't measure their sleep carefully, and 2) your brain isn't fully conscious when waking and isn't able to make a lasting note / association in that state. I really wish future versions of Whoop (or Oura or etc.) would explicitly track and correlate noise to sleep, and raise this to the population.
It's not just traffic, e.g. in SF, as a I recently found out, it is ok by law to begin arbitrarily loud road work or construction starting 7am. Same for leaf blowers and a number of other ways of getting up to 100dB.
I ran a few Deep Research sessions and a number of studies that have tried to isolate noise and show depressing outcomes for cohorts of people who sleep in noisy environments, with increased risk across all of mental health (e.g. depression, bipolar disorders, Alzheimer's incidence) but also a lot more broadly, e.g. cardiovascular disease, diabetes.
Anyway, it took me a while to notice and after (unsuccessfully) trying a number of mitigations I am moving somewhere quiet. But from what I've seen this is a major public health issue with little awareness and with incorrect accounting by the government.
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
and so, as foretold, the great tech right / populist right wing schism of 2025 begins
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
So uh…
Replying to @captgouda24 @shaggysurvives
actually a while ago the girlchat did have a somewhat serious discussion on whether or not we should start awarding honorary orgies for good tweets, inspired by you. we decided we were unsure about ur ethical integrity tho but there was an alternate universe where u had affairs with like 12 older women at once
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
How is this remotely consistent with the decades-long claim of conservatives that they believe in the free market?
If people want to purchase and consume lab-grown meat -- for health or ethical or any reason -- why should the state bar them from doing so?
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
Regardless of your views on AI, I recommend reading this
stray_cheshire_cat retweeted
I wrote a book with Eliezer Yudkowsky. It’s about how smarter-than-human AI is on track to kill us all, written in hopes of bringing the conversation into the mainstream. Lots of people are alarmed; ~nobody wants to sound alarmist. The time is ripe. Preorders help. Link below.








































