Shek N1SAT retweeted
Generative AI meets RF circuit design = game changer
• Passive networks tailored by diffusion models.
• Specify stop-band/pass-band; AI does the rest.
• Pixel patterns are not intuitive to electrical response.
Designs getting more abstract.
Prepare for a cognitive shift.
Shek N1SAT retweeted
KrakenRF fieldtrip. Hunting jammers, different setups, i also working on a better way to mount the array on my car, having just a glas roof makes things a bit tricky. Maybe suction cups of some sort, has anyone some ideas? #seekOnJam #hacker #maker #sdr #cyberdeck #cyberwarfare
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Demonstrates how the I2C, SPI and UART communication protocols work. #pcbassembly #pcba
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Happy 104th birthday to one of the greatest science fiction writers of all times, Isaac Asimov!
Books like 'Foundation' paved the path for the evolution of sci-fi genre we see today. He was truly a remarkable braniac.
Shek N1SAT retweeted
There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy. Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics. Michelle and I are wishing him a quick recovery.
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Doing some extra driving today so I had to get out all the devices. @wiglenet #wardriver #wardriving
Shek N1SAT retweeted
as a longtime fan of Conway's "Game of Life" algorithm i never once considered visualizing the time axis physically -- this is breathtaking and elegant to me
credit:
instagram.com/reel/C2hoRnFsm…
Shek N1SAT retweeted
AI has changed how we build products. From GitHub co-pilot and coding assistants to full blown no code solutions — it’s a changing landscape.
In this weeks episode of Stackability AI we sit with @ryancarson and dig deep into the new frontier AI app dev
open.spotify.com/episode/0Ct…
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Consider a young but bright kid, who's about to play chess for the first time after studying the rules, facing Stockfish 15 as an opponent.
"Why are you so sure I'll lose?" asks the kid, who happens to be a boy. "The game AI and I start with the same pieces. We both know the rules of chess. I get to move first, which seems like a big advantage."
"Stockfish 15 ranks at ELO 3700 and world champion Magnus Carlsen ranks at ELO 2882," you reply.
"What do those numbers even mean?" says the kid (who really is quite bright).
"Interesting question," you say. "I'd say—it measures the player's ability to achieve their desired outcomes, against the efforts of an opposing player, with equal resources, under equal rules. By choosing *which* move to make."
"That sounds kind of weird and mystical and abstract," says the kid. "Can you tell me *how* Stockfish is going to beat me, when it doesn't have any more or better chess pieces than I do, or any better knowledge of the rules?"
"No human being could reliably predict how Stockfish will defeat you," you reply, "even if we knew exactly which moves you'd make yourself in every situation. If I could predict exactly where Stockfish 15 would move, I could defeat Magnus Carlsen just by making the moves I'd predict Stockfish would make. Maybe if your moves have sufficiently straightforward vulnerabilities there'll be an obvious way to exploit those, as seen by a human grandmaster; but Stockfish can search more moves than any human can, better than we can, and it might find an even better way to defeat you."
The kid rolls his eyes at all this worshipful talk of Stockfish and how it's better than he is. "Have you ever seen Stockfish play?"
"Actually, no," you reply honestly. "I'm nonetheless *very* confident in its ability to defeat you."
The kid rolls his eyes again, and starts by moving his queen's bishop's pawn, so he can get his queen out onto the board and start capturing enemy pieces—as soon as there's one that's not defended under the chess rules, that is. "How about if I move my rook over here?" the kid says, a few moves into the game. "Then the AI will try to take it with its queen, and I'll come in and grab the queen. How will the AI win after I've got its queen?"
"Okay, now you're failing at putting yourself in the AI's shoes and asking how to win from its position, even using *your own* intelligence," you tell the kid. "You're imagining the chess AI as doing things that you wouldn't do in its shoes; *you* think the AI loses if it grabs for your rook, but you're not imagining the AI as knowing that. You're evaluating everything from the perspective of how it could turn out well for you, but not from the perspective of an opponent who sees everything you see and wants you to lose."
"Oh," he says, "so you're saying the AI can read my mind? That just sounds like magic."
"Well, *this* AI can't read your mind," you say. "What I'm saying, rather, is that it can think of at least everything you can, and probably a lot more. So any time you ask what Stockfish sees in the chess game's state, you have to assume it sees *at least* what you see. There's a learnable mental motion for it, like not just running out to put your life savings into Microsoft stock as soon as it occurs to you that Microsoft makes a lot of money selling Windows, because you realize that the broader market already knows this and the price of Microsoft stock already takes into account their Windows revenue stream."
The kid is now ignoring you. He makes his moves, quickly by chess standards, though the kid doesn't seem to realize he's moving fast...
The game ends quickly. Faster than you expected, even having some abstract idea of Stockfish's cognitive abilities.
"I see what I did wrong," says the kid. "Let me try again, this time I won't—"
"Sorry," you say, putting the chess board away. "It's the nature of this game that you only get one try at playing it, ever."
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Project #2: LLM Visualization
So I created a web-page to visualize a small LLM, of the sort that's behind ChatGPT. Rendered in 3D, it shows all the steps to run a single token inference. (link in bio)
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Computationalism is a completionist philosophical system, with easy to climb foothills and an inevitable and still unconquered peak. Wittgenstein made the basecamp, failed the climb, and turned back. Minsky perished in the ascent.
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Skeptics just one year ago: don’t worry, AGI is 100 years away
Skeptics now: don’t worry, AGI is at least 3-5 years away
Have you stopped to think about what this means?
The world as we know it really may end in the next few years.
Americans are now 5 to 1 (!) in favor of banning the development of superintelligent AIs - with bipartisan support.
The average AI engineer thinks there is a ~40% chance AI destroys the world.
A few tech companies are playing Russian Roulette with the planet, racing to create an AI species that thinks a million times faster than us and will outnumber us 10000 to 1.
And, yet, we have more regulations on selling a sandwich.
No one AGI lab can unilaterally slow down, only governments can stop the race.
I don’t know how else to say this, but governments, what the hell are you waiting for?
By "not any time soon", I mean "clearly not in the next 5 years", contrary to a number of folks in the AI industry.
Yes, I'm skeptical of quantum computing, particularly when it comes to its application to AI.
cnbc.com/2023/12/03/meta-ai-…
Shek N1SAT retweeted
The designers of the RBMK-1000 reactor that exploded in Chernobyl understood the physics of nuclear reactors vastly vastly better than anyone will understand artificial superintelligence at the point it first gets created.
Shek N1SAT retweeted
Calling all radio enthusiasts! This is the preliminary TLE we will be using to track the satellite, stay tuned for updated TLEs as we get them 🛰️
drive.google.com/file/d/1mNK…





























