Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
teapawt.net/i/spaces/1peAMkPWLpOda…
Set a reminder and plan yo join us this evening!!! 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 @citezw @Luckson_Ndlovu @okaNjobo @soxthepoet @ChronicleZim @pashor_sibanda @khulumanifm95 @SkyzMetroFM
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
📍 Join us tomorrow evening @ 19:00 CAT @citezw @Luckson_Ndlovu @okaNjobo as we explore the Anglo-Ndebele War of 1893. @zenzele @khulumanifm95 @SkyzMetroFM @jqmayisa @mtnkala @Kofi_SiribosBae @ma_bhoqo @Cde_Ostallos @bekemaplanka @ChronicleZim 🚨🚨🚨
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
🚨🎙️ Jason Wilcox talking about his role and how he is “ultimately accountable” and “the pressure is a privilege.” He speaks about wanting to “feel like a family, perform like a team.”
Manchester United feels very far from a family right now and as he says, he has to take ACCOUNTABILITY.
A piece of Zimbabwe’s history, now available for free!
Judith Todd has made her book, Through the Darkness: A Life in Zimbabwe, available to download for free. The book offers a fascinating personal account of Zimbabwe’s turbulent political history, from the Rhodesian era to independence and beyond.
If you are interested in Zimbabwe’s history, this is one book worth reading.
Here’s the link to get your copy:academia.edu/179451763/Judy_…
my first tweet
my most liked tweet
my most retweeted tweet
my most bookmarked tweet
my most viewed tweet
my tweet with the most replies
my tweet with the most quotes
@grok
With links
1
90
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Yesterday, my friend Estelle Adams took me to a restaurant in Milton Keynes called Braai Shack Restaurant, a beautiful Zimbabwean-owned establishment run by ladies from Bulawayo. It is situated at 42 Church Street, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, MK12 5JN.
To say that I was impressed by the quality of the food, the presentation and the hospitality would be an understatement. I have often complained that we do not have enough high-quality Zimbabwean or Southern African restaurants in England. Braai Shack completely changed that conversation for me.
This is not just a place to eat. It is a carefully created experience in a very clean environment. The restaurant is beautifully designed, professionally run and welcoming. There is a dining area where people can enjoy excellent food, as well as a space where customers can sit and watch football together. The presentation is exceptional, with beautiful African-inspired tableware, woven placemats and colourful serving bowls that create a genuine taste of home away from home.
The food itself was outstanding. It was not only delicious; it was presented with pride and dignity that reminded me of village Kango plates. You could see that the people behind this restaurant understand that food is more than something placed on a plate. Food carries memory. It carries identity. It takes us back to our mothers’ kitchens, our grandmothers’ homes, family gatherings.
Sometimes, a single meal can make a person who is thousands of miles from home feel emotionally connected to where they come from.
The portions were simply enormous. I had to take a huge doggy bag home, and since I am alone at home today, I have been enjoying the food I could not finish last night without worrying about cooking.
They serve generous portions at very reasonable prices, making it an excellent place for families, friends and anyone who appreciates good food without having to spend a fortune.
They also offer a wonderful selection of Zimbabwean and South African drinks like Bohlingers, Zambezi, Castle, Lion, Windhoek, Cream Soda and more, alongside all the other drinks you would expect to find in a British restaurant. It genuinely feels like a little piece of home, presented with warmth, pride and excellent hospitality.
What touched me most was learning that, at the moment, much of Braai Shack’s clientele is South African, despite the large Zimbabwean community living in Milton Keynes, Northampton, Daventry and the surrounding areas. This is something we need to reflect on seriously, and change
I always remember a conversation I once had with one of Zimbabwe’s biggest businesspeople, the late Sam Levy, who built the Sam Levy’s complex in Borrowdale. I was taken to see him by Zimbabwean media executive and mentor, Richard Mashave. During that conversation, Sam Levy spoke about his own journey and explained how the Jewish community supported one another in Rhodesia.
He said they created an environment in which people who started businesses were not simply left to struggle alone. They supported one another, patronised one another’s businesses, shared opportunities and made sure that new ventures had a chance to survive. Their success was not built only on individual effort. It was strengthened by community.
That is an important lesson for all of us.
When one of our own opens a restaurant, a shop, a salon, a farm, a transport company, a consultancy or any other business in a foreign country, we should not wait for that person to become successful before we support them. We should support them while they are still building. We should be their first customers, their first promoters and, where possible, their first source of encouragement.
A community is not defined only by the language we speak, the country we come from or the songs we sing. A community is defined by what we do for one another.
If we only attend businesses owned by our people when they are already famous, fully established and profitable, then we are not really supporting them. We are merely arriving after the difficult work has been done. True support means showing up when the chairs are still empty, when the business is still finding its feet, when the owners are working long hours and when every customer genuinely matters.
We must learn to celebrate one another without envy. We must learn to recommend one another without expecting payment. We must learn to spend our money in businesses that reflect our identity and create opportunities for our people. When we support one another, the money circulates within the community, jobs are created, families are sustained and future entrepreneurs gain the courage to try.
This does not mean that we should support poor service or dishonesty simply because someone is Zimbabwean. Businesses must still be professional, accountable and committed to quality as the Braai Shack is. But when our people are doing things properly, we must not allow indifference, jealousy or unnecessary negativity to destroy what they are building.
Yesterday, I was so excited by the hospitality I received that I surprised the ladies by making a video call to the mayor of their home city, Bulawayo. The mayor David Coltart spoke to one of them, and the joy on her face was unforgettable. For a moment, that restaurant became more than a business in Milton Keynes. It became a small piece of Bulawayo in the diaspora.
That is the power of enterprise. It does not merely generate income. It carries culture across borders. It gives immigrants a place to gather, remember, celebrate and feel seen. It reminds our children that Zimbabwean identity is not something they have to leave behind in order to succeed elsewhere.
I will definitely return to Braai Shack before I go back to Africa, and I encourage Zimbabweans living in Milton Keynes, Northampton, Daventry and the surrounding areas to visit and support this business.
Let us stop waiting for outsiders to discover the value in what our own people are creating. Let us be the first to recognise excellence among ourselves.
When one Zimbabwean succeeds, it should not be treated as an isolated personal victory. It should become a source of encouragement, employment, inspiration and possibility for the entire community.
We do not need to remain scattered individuals competing against one another. We can become a network of people who open doors for one another, recommend one another, invest in one another and refuse to allow the dreams of our people to die from lack of support.
Braai Shack is not just serving food. These ladies are serving courage, culture and a vision of what Zimbabweans can build when they combine talent with discipline and receive the support of their own people.
Let us show up for them. Follow them on social media.
facebook.com/share/p/18fzqCX…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the broke billionaire.
MANCHESTER UNITED
He paid $33 a share. It closed at $20.00 this week.
At a $3.44bn market cap, his roughly 29% stake is worth about $1.0bn on the market. Around 39% below what he paid.
Club net debt passed $1bn for the first time. The $425m of 3.79% notes were refinanced into $550m at 5.36%. Cash at 31 March: £60.9m, down from £73.2m.
A £3bn new stadium, "privately financed" with no commencement date in sight.
Until February 2027, if the Glazers accept $33+ a share for the club, Ratcliffe is legally forced to sell too.
OGC NICE
Bought for about €100m in 2019. Asked €200m. Price cut. US sale collapsed in June 2026. Now needs €40m in player sales just to spend.
INEOS AUTOMOTIVE
Built to make 30,000 cars a year at Hambach. 2025 production came in under 7,000, down from 7,500 in 2024. Two straight years of nine-figure losses. Hundreds of job cuts.
PERSONAL FORTUNE
2023: £29.69bn
2024: £23.52bn
2025: £17.05bn
2026: £15.19bn
£14.5bn gone in three years. Down about 50%. From 2nd richest in Britain to 9th.
DEBT
By late 2025, INEOS Group Holdings and INEOS Quattro carried over £18bn of debt, up almost £3bn in a single year.
Annual debt servicing costs: £1.8bn. Up £600m in a year.
Projected Quattro's debt at 16.7x earnings for 2026.
In February 2026, S&P cut Group Holdings to B+ and Quattro two notches to B. No sustained recovery before 2028.
BORROWING
May 2026: €700m of new notes at 7.875%.
Group Holdings paid €474.8m in interest and finance items in just the first half of 2026.
INEOS QUATTRO
Even in the best chemicals quarter in years, Quattro lost money.
Q2 2026 loss: €34.7m
H1 2026 loss: €66.2m
Debt: €7.14bn
Total equity: €1.82bn
Shareholders had to inject €200m of fresh equity to prop it up.
NO DIVIDENDS
INEOS skipped its dividend for a second straight year. Group revenue fell from €16.2bn to €14.3bn in 2025, and European earnings nearly halved, from €470.2m to €252.3m.
Meanwhile, in H1 2026 alone, Group Holdings and Quattro paid a combined €86.1m in management fees to INEOS Services, a company owned by the same parent Ratcliffe controls.
Cash fell from €2.58bn at New Year to €1.85bn by June.
EUROPE
Antwerp: €3.0bn already drawn on its loan facilities. Start-up pushed to 2027 after the final modules got stuck at the Strait of Hormuz. INEOS is now suing Flanders and taking Belgium to international arbitration over about €1.5bn of claimed losses.
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
This is one way to describe the — main — problem with Manchester United since Ineos came in:
🔺I believe that everyone is somewhat familiar with the concept of the Dragon Den. Entrepreneurs meet a group of cynical investors. Pitch their idea and get told all the flaws it has.
Ineos plan for United wouldn’t get past the first stage if they showed up at the Dragons Den.
🔺It is as simple as this: Man Utd must play in the Champions League to have a healthy financial situation. To play in the CL regularly, United must become better relative to its rivals.
In football, you can become better through either (a) spending more money than your rivals and/or (b) spending better than your rivals.
🔺(a) has an extremely strong impact on performance. Only Arsenal, City, Chelsea, Liverpool and United have finished in the top 3 in the PL the last 5 years. If we look at the last 10 years, only Tottenham joins the top 3 list. Last 15, Leicester also joins. If we look at the top 3 the last 33 years in the PL — it’s still the same 5 that has finished their more than twice, except Tottenham’s 2016-2018 run.
United have had a — massive — need to investment in its squad since 21/22. But has spends much much less than its rivals.
🔺So United’s hope is — solely — (b) to spend smarter than our rivals. This is what we are selling to angel investors.
Here comes the reason Ineos would be laughed off the floor at the Dragons Den:
WHY should United recruit better than our rivals? Everything, and I mean everything, points towards United will spend — worse — than its rivals. Nothing else should be expected.
1. There is much more pressure on players United sign than anywhere else in the world
2. The club does not have a functioning team on the pitch, so new signings cannot come in and thrive in a stable environment
3. The club does not have a clear identity for which players can be recruited and thrive in regardless who is the manager at a specific point in time. The trackrecord of going from one extreme to another all over the “identity map” is absurd: Moyes to Van Gaal to Mourinho to Ole to Ragnick to ETH to Amorim to Carrick.
4. The recruitment team is brand new and haven’t worked together before
5. The club has zero flexibility with its budget surely established by the Glazers
🔺Sure, I can miss something. But I honestly simply cannot understand how someone can interview Omar Berrada, hear him lay out the above plan on behalf of Ineos, and not question it.
United are miles behind City, Arsenal, even Liverpool, in many ways Chelsea. We intend to spend a lot less than them. But the plan is to make up a ton of ground and blow past them in just 3-4 years? It’s a joke of a plan, unless there is a miracle (and since we are talking Manchester United, you can never rule that out).
But the plan is naive, very naive.
A big thanks to @UnitedStandMUFC for inviting me into the studio pre-match last night to see how the magic happens.
I stand by what I say, it's not the cheque book of the club that's the problem, it's the culture and the arrogance of those at the top.
If you have people who are not football professionals thinking they know how to run football then screw ups will be the consequence.
If you have owners who think that a culture of bullying, mistrust and backstabbing are the way to run United, and that staff are expenses to be cut rather than assets to build success, then underperformance will be the consequence.
Since SAF left United as manager they are third in the player purchase cost total but ninth in the player sales, so on a net basis they end up top, which makes it more difficult to recruit going forwards.
A circus is a business but you wouldn't have clowns run it...
Figures from valuball.co/
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
"Manchester United is locked in an often dysfunctional relationship with its fan base."
In an essay, Bloomberg explores the uneasy relationship between Premier League clubs and their fans. bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Enlightening interview with Mthandazo Peter Moyo.
He says it is important to understand that we are rooted in Matebeleland and we have the responsibility to make sure Matebeleland works.
He says "we need to build a passion amongst our people, for what we can do back home".
youtu.be/Whu-uJcvHrE?si=-WZk…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Over 10 seasons between 2025/16 & 2024/25, #MCFC earned £343m more from European TV & prize money than #MUFC. That’s 3 Elliot Andersons or the annual equivalent of United’s yearly Glazers induced interest bill (which is set to rise).
United are back in the Champions League for the first time in 3 seasons tonight & if they’re serious about challenging on the pitch & building a new £2bn stadium it has, as a minimum, to mark the start of a permanent reunion with Europe’s flagship competition.
⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/football/202…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
4 points out of 9 having played two newly promoted teams and an Everton side with 18 players is a poor start. Six goals conceded tells you what most #MUFC fans knew; the defence needed a reboot. Poor from the Glazers and INEOS but true form the season after CL qualification.
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Rio Ferdinand addresses criticism on social media claiming he acts as a mouthpiece for Manchester United's owners.
He clarifies that he is not defending the ownership, but rather highlighting the difficult financial situation inherited by figures like Jason Wilcox and the Ineos management team.
Rio points to the club's heavy debt, past overspending on player transfers and wages, and the resulting struggles to offload players permanently as the true root of United's current squad-building limitations. #mufc
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Always knew what to say and when to say it at exactly the right time. The greatest there was and ever will be.
“We lost 2 games to Man City and still won the league. We won both games last season and still won the league.
“The name of the game at this club is to WIN the league. It doesn’t matter what we do against City.”
I miss when these were the STANDARDS.
Sir Alex Ferguson calls Man City noisy neighbours - Sky Sports Retro
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
“We lost 2 games to Man City and still won the league. We won both games last season and still won the league.
“The name of the game at this club is to WIN the league. It doesn’t matter what we do against City.”
I miss when these were the STANDARDS.
🤝 Paid partnership
Sir Alex Ferguson calls Man City noisy neighbours - Sky Sports Retro
"We were NASTY to refs back in the day!" 🤬
Was football better or worse 25 years ago?
@CYAFOfficial | @jimmybullard | @RealRomfordPele
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
🚨 EXCL: Nasser Al-Khelaifi has played significant role in talks over Man Utd sale to Sheikh Jassim. PSG president has met Glazers + Raine to discuss proposed takeover. Other clubs want PL to investigate source of funds. W/ @mjshrimper @TheAthleticFC #MUFC theathletic.com/4596573/2023…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
Manchester United has published the minutes of the July Fans’ Forum meeting, where the mass ticketing sanctions exercise dominated discussion.
Fan reps made clear their unanimous opposition to how the exercise was carried out and challenged the Club strongly on evidence, fairness, proportionality and the damage to supporter relations.
The minutes record some of that challenge – though they cannot fully reflect its intensity in the room.
Read more 👇
imust.org.uk/Blog/Entry/fans…
Mthulisi Nkala retweeted
🚨🎙️ @David_Ornstein on what happened with the left-back situation and why United didn’t go for a left-back on deadline day:
“They made an inquiry for Rayan Aït-Nouri at Manchester City. It was an opportunity that was presented to them by intermediaries, and they then went and checked it out with City.
It would have been a loan, I think, with an option that City wanted — an option or obligation, I can’t quite remember.
Manchester United weren’t interested in that because he’s NOT their long-term target for that position, which suggests there IS a long-term target.
So, let’s get tongues wagging on who might be Manchester United’s next left-back signing.
It shows they were looking at that area of the pitch. We also know they had an interest in Lewis Hall previously, but he was never going to leave Newcastle this summer. The club never wanted him to go, so they weren’t willing to sanction it after all their other departures.
Whether he wanted to leave, I’m not quite sure.
Myles Lewis-Skelly was a player they explored too.
Ultimately, Manchester United are not going to do something, they say, just for the sake of it. They’re trying to act in a more disciplined, prudent and responsible way, which some would say is a departure from certain times in the past.
They will feel that with Luke Shaw, Dorgu, Harry Amass and the ability of Mazraoui to cover on that side as well, they’re okay.”
#MUFC [@TheAthleticFC pod]


































