chrollo retweeted
Was farming Arcium, my mates where applying to GT roles.
Arcium paste me $700 my mates got into GT.
After shouting gMPC for almost a year.
Guess who lost in the end ? Me
In less than 3month the make that $700 and more from salary and it doenst stop at just one time.
introducing Crux v2: research that challenges itself and now learns from independent criticism.
Crux, powered by serv reasoning, researches a question, stress tests its own answer and shows what changed.
new, built on @reppo evaluation api: anyone can send a report to independent reviewers, free, no account needed.
their critiques come back and Crux researches again and writes a better, more honest report.
real run: reppo scored it 65/100 (revise). crux went from 29 to 56 facts, answered 3 of 3 critiques and lowered its confidence because the reviewers were right.
try it: crux.myacxt.site
code: github.com/mhiah/crux
built for #servhackathon reppo track @openservai
Most AI research tells you what you want to hear. That's dangerous when you're betting money on the answer.
Introducing Crux for @openservai S1 Hackathon, open track
An AI market-research analyst, powered by SERV Reasoning, that doesn't just collect information. It reasons through conflicting evidence, challenges its own thesis, verifies claims and produces an auditable investment and business decision brief.
Ask a hard business question and Crux:
1. Researches both sides
2. Forms a first answer
3. Stress tests it like a skeptical investor
4. Re-judges every assumption
5. Gives the final answer, and shows what changed and why
We asked: "Are small businesses willing to accept crypto?" Crux checked 28 facts from 20 sources and downgraded its own answer to "a cautious, conditional yes".
Built for founders, investors, accelerators, consultants and Web3 builders.
Try it 👉 crux-rose-nu.vercel.app
git: github.com/Mhiah/postmortem-…
Google DeepMind and ETH Zurich published CaMeL: a defence against prompt injection that tracks where every value an AI agent uses came from.
Banbo puts CaMeL’s rule into a NEAR contract. an agent wallet pays only if the recipient and amount came from the owner, not from an email the agent read.
that stops the attack that limits and allowlists miss: one polite email saying “our account changed, pay us instead.”
why NEAR:
> the funds sit in the vault contract, never with the agent
> the agent’s key can only call request_payment
> every payment is settled exactly once
the contract checks where each value came from, and can verify an Intel TDX quote on-chain
Live on NEAR testnet: Claude paid a real invoice, a forged one was held for the owner, and an email redirect was refused on-chain.
Code: github.com/Mhiah/Banbo
Try it: banbo.myacxt.site
Built for #NEARHackathon @NEARProtocol @NearBuilders @NEARLegion
chrollo retweeted
if you actually still vote this current government back in after all the complaints over the last 4 years, God suppose punish you
I refuse to let the dream of crypto die.
Help us help the world remember that crypto can be used for more than stablecoins, payments, and tokenized stonks.
Support our attempt at consumer crypto at app.intuition.systems/
$TRUST your @0xIntuition
chrollo retweeted
another step forward for .ely identity!
.ely names are now integrated into @oxleydotfun, bringing human-readable names to its leaderboard, holder activity table, and wallet tracking UI.
Expanding identity, one integration at a time.
Oxley now supports your favorite features.
By popular demand, we've shipped a leaderboard, push notifications on tracked wallets, scheduled launches, PnL cards, and Elysium Names support.
Next stop: @Enter_Elysium mainnet.
almost 4500 people have already joined the @FungoLabs x campaign and the fomo is getting real
beyond the growing number of participants, your focus should stay on consistency and valuable posts
don't let the rush push you into creating content just for posting sake
take your time, do your research/bend people's post, structure your thoughts properly, juice your post and submit your content one after another
remember quality over quantity 🧏♂️
Authorized. i'm part of the slymz crew. see you in the undercity.
thank you @slymzcrew 🤭
chrollo retweeted
To everyone in crypto, It's time to stop accepting extraction as the norm.
Cycle after cycle, we've watched the same mistakes repeat. The same short-term thinking. The same value extraction.
At @AscendLaunch, we're here to raise the standard for this entire industry. We believe the value created onchain should flow back to the people and ecosystems responsible for creating it.
It's time to break the cycle. It's time to build something that lasts. It's time to push this industry forward.
We will make onchain great again.
That's a promise.
The wealth effect of kinetiq:native is about to begin, sparking an onchain movement similar to when Solana generated a wealth effect and started a multi-year onchain bull run.
Some of the best times of trenching were during the Solana wealth effect era. When it had ran from $8 to $290 over 2 years, onchain flourished incredibly well and many traders were able to achieve generational wealth.
We are seeing the same exact setup on kinetiq:native, and have built @AscendLaunch the most participant-aligned launchpad, built on Elysium, the value-accretive L2.
For the first time, an L2 and its leading launchpad are aligned around growing ecosystem value rather than extracting it.
We have positioned the premier launchpad as value-accretive to the entire Elysium ecosystem, from the foundation ($HYPE) to the Layer 2 (kinetiq:native) and finally to participants on our launchpad (traders, stakers, and builders).
Rather than develop a launchpad token, we have chosen to adopt kinetiq:native as our protocol token, and have made major improvements to our tokenomics upping our KNTQ buybacks to 80% of protocol fees going into buying KNTQ, burning it, and deploying it strategically.
This, paired with 50% of Elysium sequencer fees going to buying back and burning kinetiq:native makes the setup extremely asymmetrical.
We believe that if kinetiq:native does well, so will onchain, which will mean that Ascend does well making our participants have an even stronger flywheel. KNTQ does well -> Elysium does well -> Ascend does well -> Traders, builders, stakers do well -> KNTQ does well. This is the flywheel and wealth effect we expect to see with kinetiq:native.
The problem: Traditional launchpads extract liquidity through competing protocol tokens, fees that leave the ecosystem, and little sustained demand for launched tokens.
Our solution: No protocol token. Instead, Ascend has adopted kinetiq:native as our protocol token. 90% of Ascend protocol fees buy back KNTQ (80%) and HYPE (20%). The remaining 10% is the team treasury.
Staking: Users stake HYPE via kHYPE on Ascend, directing yield toward ecosystem token buybacks while earning four reward streams: HYPE, ecosystem tokens, KNTQ, and boosted DEX referral fees.
20% HYPE allocation:
- 50% Staker rewards
- 50% Protocol-owned staked HYPE on Ascend
80% KNTQ allocation:
- 40% Burnt
- 60% deployed strategically across ecosystem token buybacks, Ascend points program, protocol-owned KNTQ LP across Ascend token pools + kHYPE
- Traders: No competing protocol token extracting liquidity from their positions. Ecosystem buybacks from protocol fees + staking yield.
- Tokens: Recurring buybacks funded by protocol fees and staker yield. Supported LP depth from Ascend treasury.
- Builders: No launchpad token competing for liquidity, grants, launches with dedicated buyback support through Ascended listings, and a growth path to HyperCore spot and HIP-3 perps facilitated by Kinetiq's HIP-3 Perps DEX, as well as rev share from Ascend via our Strategic Partnerships.
- Stakers: Multiple reward streams while supporting ecosystem growth.
Unlocking new capital: Rather than recycling the same liquidity across Solana, Base, and Robinhood, Ascend gives HYPE holders a way to deploy sidelined capital into new ecosystem launches.
The Elysium advantage: While other L2s retain sequencer revenue, Elysium directs 50% toward KNTQ buybacks and 25% toward builders.
Ascend commits 100% of its sequencer-fee allocation to grants for builders launching on Ascend, creating a powerful incentive to build on Elysium instead of competing ecosystems such as Base & Robinhood.
The scale: At $5M/month in Elysium sequencer fees, a 10% allocation to Ascend would generate $500K/month in builder incentives, funding grants, HyperCore spot listings, AMM liquidity, etc.
For reference, Robinhood generated $14M in sequencer fees in a 30-day period, while Base generated approximately $75m in a 1 year period.
Further, the buyback effect of a top launchpad on HYPE, KNTQ, and ecosystem tokens are significant.
In September, the 30d total of fees generated across top launchpads: PUMP ($165M), PONS ($132M), Flap ($41M), Stonkfun ($27M). At scale, Ascend would contribute mid 6-figures to low 7-figures of daily buybacks to HYPE & KNTQ.
The vision: Make Ascend the obvious place to build, trade, and stake. Stakers are the backbone of Ascend, and will receive many benefits of the protocol's success with many rev shares in place.
Builders are attracted by grants, sustained buyback support, a clear path to HyperCore spot and HIP-3 Perps through Kinetiq, and eventually becoming an Ascend Strategic Partner.
Traders are attracted by PVE tokenomics where protocol activity strengthens the ecosystem instead of extracting from it.
Together, these create a flywheel: better incentives attract better builders, better launches attract more traders, and more activity drives even greater buyback support and ecosystem growth.
i minted this bad boy by @slymzcrew
also applied for a whitelist can you please accept me thanks
3
94




































