Norman Sasono (@nsasono) header
Norman Sasono (@nsasono) profile picture

Fintech CTO. Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, AI. “Mens et Manus". “Physics is The Law. Everything else is recommendation”.

Jakarta, Indonesia
Joined July 2009
Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)Photo by Norman Sasono (@nsasono)
Norman Sasono retweeted
Brosnan as Bond 🤝 Black tie.
56
413
44
4,538
70,413
Norman Sasono retweeted
The camera panning from the clock at 0:07 to Pierce Brosnan. Absolute cinema.
69
1,517
18
18,953
430,019
Norman Sasono retweeted
Did someone say 007? 🤵‍♂️ #USOpen
40
934
73
9,387
172,302
If I were smarter, I'd still be doing Mathematical Physics. 😅
6
540
Norman Sasono retweeted
All of the action of GOLDENEYE in 60 seconds. You’re welcome.
16
189
6
1,196
45,929
Norman Sasono retweeted
There will be no AI jobpocalypse. The story that AI will lead to massive unemployment is stoking unnecessary fear. AI — like any other technology — does affect jobs, but telling overblown stories of large-scale unemployment is irresponsible and damaging. Let’s put a stop to it. I’ve expressed skepticism about the jobpocalypse in previous posts. I’m glad to see that the popular press is now pushing back on this narrative. The image below features some recent headlines. Software engineering is the sector most affected by AI tools, as coding agents race ahead. Yet hiring of software engineers remains strong! So while there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. Further, despite all the exciting progress in AI, the U.S. unemployment rate remains a healthy 4.3%. Why is the AI jobpocalypse narrative so popular? For one thing, frontier AI labs have a strong incentive to tell stories that make AI technology sound more powerful. At their most extreme, they promote science-fiction scenarios of AI “taking over” and causing human extinction. If a technology can replace many employees, surely that technology must be very valuable! Also, a lot of SaaS software companies charge around $100-$1000 per user/year. But if an AI company can replace an employee who makes $100,000 — or make them 50% more productive — then charging even $10,000 starts to look reasonable. By anchoring not to typical SaaS prices but to salaries of employees, AI companies can charge a lot more. Additionally, businesses have a strong incentive to talk about layoffs as if they were caused by AI. After all, talking about how they’re using AI to be far more productive with fewer staff makes them look smart. This is a better message than admitting they overhired during the pandemic when capital was abundant due to low interest rates and a massive government financial stimulus. To be clear, I recognize that AI is causing a lot of people’s work to change. This is hard. This is stressful. (And to some, it can be fun.) I empathize with everyone affected. At the same time, this is very different from predicting a collapse of the job market. Societies are capable of telling themselves stories for years that have little basis in reality and lead to poor society-wide decision making. For example, fears over nuclear plant safety led to under-investment in nuclear power. Fears of the “population bomb” in the 1960s led countries to implement harsh policies to reduce their populations. And worries about dietary fat led governments to promote unhealthy high-sugar diets for decades. Now that mainstream media is openly skeptical about the jobpocalypse, I hope these stories will start to lose their teeth (much like fears of AI-driven human extinction have). Contrary to the predictions of an AI jobpocalypse, I predict the opposite: There will be an AI jobapalooza! AI will lead to a lot more good AI engineering jobs, and I’m also optimistic about the future of the overall job market. What AI engineers do will be different from traditional software engineering, and many of these jobs will be in businesses other than traditional large employers of developers. In non-AI roles, too, the skills needed will change because of AI. That makes this a good time to encourage more people to become proficient in AI, and make sure they’re ready for the different but plentiful jobs of the future! [Original text in The Batch newsletter.]
587
1,189
284
5,346
830,774
Norman Sasono retweeted
Anthropic has 454 open roles. The company is hiring software engineers at $320K-$405K. Their CEO, Dario, said three months ago that coding is "going away first, then all of software engineering." The paradox resolves instantly. Dario's engineers told him they don't write code anymore. They let Claude write it. They edit. They review. They architect. They didn't lose their jobs. They got faster. Anthropic grew from a small research lab to 1,500 employees in four years, adding engineers the entire time. This has played out five times in computing history. Compilers replaced assembly. Frameworks replaced boilerplate. Cloud replaced server management. Every prediction was the same: most programmers won't be needed. Every result was the same: the number of engineers grew. The global software engineer pool went from roughly 5 million in 2010 to 28.7 million today. BLS projects 17% growth in US software developer roles through 2033, adding 304,000 positions. The pool is projected to hit 45 million by 2030. When building software gets cheaper, more problems become worth solving with software. A startup that needed 10 engineers now needs 3. But 50 companies that couldn't afford to build at all now can. The denominator shrinks. The numerator explodes. Meta's engineering headcount is up 19% from January 2022. Google's is up 16%. Apple, 13%. These companies adopted AI coding tools years ago. They're using Copilot and Claude Code daily. They're hiring more engineers than before those tools existed. Every generation of "coding is dead" content creates two cohorts: engineers who freeze up, and engineers who build 10x more with the new tools. The second group has won every single time.
206
458
100
3,630
1,838,307
Norman Sasono retweeted
30 years of Pierce Brosnan as 007.
57
711
103
3,490
102,429
Norman Sasono retweeted
30 years later, this GOLDENEYE chase is still unmatched.
95
822
89
6,175
225,725
Norman Sasono retweeted
Celebrate 30 years of GOLDENEYE, back in cinemas today. For more information go to 007.com.
69
699
98
4,287
126,446
Norman Sasono retweeted
Has it been 63 years already?
286
4,628
346
21,144
662,571
Norman Sasono retweeted
To celebrate James Bond Day, GOLDENEYE returns to the big screen worldwide from Friday 3 October in 4K, marking thirty years since the film's release. More information and tickets on 007.com.
98
682
157
4,079
199,539
Pardon the performance. I am a CTO. Not a singer. 😂
3
2
11
1,478
Well, I’m a Punkrocker, Yes, I am. Cos I’m a Punkrocker, Yes, I am.
3
19
6
412
28,183