Pinned Tweet
Proof of Work ❌
Proof of Stake ❌
Proof of Continuity ✅
What if time itself became part of the economics?
Something different is coming to PulseChain.
Full details in due course. 🦊 🚀
🚨 RICHARD HEART: THE BIGGEST PULSECHAIN STORY THIS WEEK.
Turkey has officially confirmed the arrest of HEX, PulseChain and PulseX founder Richard Heart.
Authorities report seizing $7.15M in cash and six cold wallets. The detention follows an Interpol Red Notice requested by Finland.
Important distinction: his US SEC case was dismissed in 2025. The Finnish allegations are separate, and legal proceedings remain ongoing.
The big question now: what happens to PulseChain if Richard Heart remains in custody?
🦊 #PulseChain #HEX
pimofficial retweeted
Replying to @abakingurlek
Dear Mr. President @realDonaldTrump,
Richard Heart (Richard James Schueler), an American citizen and founder of HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX, was detained in Istanbul on an Interpol red notice requested solely by Finland. The notice is for alleged tax matters in Finland - not a U.S. criminal charge.
The U.S. SEC’s civil case against him (claiming unregistered offerings) was dismissed in 2025 for lack of jurisdiction.
There is no U.S. indictment.
As an American, he deserves due process and protection from being held on a foreign tax allegation that has been misrepresented in Turkish statements as “$1 billion U.S./Finland crypto fraud.”
Please look into his situation and ensure a U.S. citizen is not left stranded abroad on an inaccurate Interpol request.
Thank you. 🇺🇸
Ledger confirmed an unauthorized hardware implant in one affected wallet linked to reseller CryptoBilis.
Pretty worrying when a device meant to protect your keys can be tampered with before you open it. Wider thefts are still under investigation.
Would you buy from a reseller?
Source: Ledger's official statement, 10 October 2026
pimofficial retweeted
Imagine if we, as a community, united around one coin and collectively decided that it would be our store of value.
We buy it. We hold it. We build deep, sustainable liquidity around it.
And when we need money, instead of selling our holdings, we simply borrow against them.
With deep liquidity, broad ownership, and a resilient market, manipulating the coin’s price becomes much more expensive, making economic attacks against lending protocols harder to execute.
This is something we can learn from wealthy people in traditional finance.
They don’t necessarily sell their stocks whenever they need cash. They borrow against their assets, maintain their long-term exposure, and let their wealth continue to compound.
Buy. Hold. Build liquidity. Borrow when needed.
Instead of constantly selling our assets to fund our lives, we could build a financial ecosystem that allows our community to preserve long-term ownership while accessing liquidity.
That’s how we start thinking about generational wealth.
Standard Chartered plans crypto, stablecoin and tokenised-asset custody in Singapore.
Interesting part? It would sit alongside its existing securities services, where institutions operate.
Still subject to regulatory requirements. Which assets will clients bring in first?
Source: Standard Chartered announcement, 8 October 2026
pimofficial retweeted
🚀 What’s Coming This October: @zkxwallet & Liberty Roadmap
October is going to be a busy month. We’re continuing to build ZKX Wallet and the Liberty ecosystem into a more complete trading, privacy, and DeFi experience.
Coming this October:
🌎 Multi-Language ZKX Wallet
Multi-language support is coming to ZKX Wallet, making the wallet more accessible globally.
📱 ZKX Wallet Native Mobile Apps
Our native mobile apps are coming to iOS and Android.
📈 Full In-Wallet Exchange Experience
We’re expanding ZKX Wallet’s in-app trading and Liberty DEX toward a full crypto exchange experience. Expect continuous feature, routing, and UI improvements throughout the month.
🥞 PancakeSwap Integration
More liquidity sources and routing options for in-wallet trading.
⏱️ DCA for In-Wallet Swaps
Automated dollar-cost averaging directly inside the wallet.
🏦 Liberty Lend
Our conservative lending protocol is scheduled for release this month.
🛡️ Clear Signing Everywhere
Clear Signing will be enforced across supported networks, including PulseChain, giving users more visibility into what they are signing.
🔐 Edit & Revoke Approvals
Manage, edit, and revoke token approvals directly inside ZKX Wallet.
🥷 Railgun Public Broadcaster
Another step toward making private transactions easier and more accessible.
🚀 Liberty Launchpad / PumpForFun
Core development is complete. We’re now working on APIs, infrastructure, and stress testing so the system is ready when market conditions are right for launch.
And there is more being built behind the scenes.
Disclaimer: This is our current October development roadmap, not a guarantee of release dates. Priorities and timelines may change based on testing, security reviews, infrastructure readiness, third-party dependencies, app-store approvals, and market conditions. We will never rush a release at the expense of security or reliability.
Something I think gets missed with PulseX: it’s still producing real protocol activity while sentiment is awful.
PulseX V2 has done about $51M in DEX volume over the last 30 days, generating roughly $148k in fees.
That matters more to me than pretending we know where the bottom is. The exchange is being used, fees are being generated and the wider PulseChain DEX ecosystem is still processing hundreds of thousands of transactions a day.
If this is what the machinery looks like with barely any attention on PulseChain, I’m very interested to see what it does when liquidity actually rotates back.
$PLS $PLSX #PulseChain
Are you paying attention yet?
I haven’t used a traditional bank for over 2 years.
What we need is a proper crypto-native neobank that supports PulseChain assets, with lower fees, better yield, and a much better user experience.
And we’re building it into @zkxwallet.
The real #NeverSelling prophecy on PulseChain. 😎
I found something on PulseChain that I think says more about the ecosystem than another price chart.
SquirrelSwap is now routing swaps across 15 PulseChain DEXs — PulseX, 9mm, 9inch, PHUX, SwitchX, Liberty and others — and can split a trade across pools to reduce price impact.
Think about what that actually means. PulseChain liquidity isn’t sitting in one venue anymore. There’s enough independent DEX infrastructure that aggregators now have a genuine routing problem to solve.
That’s a much more mature DeFi setup than PulseChain had at launch.
Price is still beaten up. The plumbing underneath it keeps getting better.
How many people outside PulseChain even realise there are 15 venues worth aggregating now?
$PLS $PLSX #PulseChain
A little update on PIM 🦊
I’ve been building PIM out of my own pocket because I genuinely think PulseChain needs better market intelligence, wallet tracking, liquidity data and tools that actually help people understand what’s happening onchain.
The problem is simple: keeping the infrastructure running while I continue building is costing me around $200 every month.
I can pause development and keep PIM alive through the research/posts you see here, then come back to the platform later.
But before I do that, I want to ask the community something.
If I created a small PIM Founders group where early supporters helped fund development in return for early access, founder benefits and a say in what gets built next… would anyone actually be interested?
I’m not asking for money today. I just want to see if there’s genuine demand.
If you’d want to be involved, reply PIM 🦊
If enough people are interested, I’ll put together the details.
🤖 Made with AI
Be prepared. It’s all about to begin. We’re ready, we’re building. January 2027, everything changes forever.
A useful way to think about $PLSX that gets missed:
PulseX doesn’t need PLSX buyers to voluntarily burn tokens.
Part of the DEX fee is used to buy PLSX from the market and permanently burn it. So actual swapping creates recurring buy-and-burn pressure as a consequence of usage.
That’s why I care far more about sustained PulseX volume than random green candles.
More genuine DEX activity → more fees → more PLSX removed.
Price can ignore that for a long time, obviously. But if PulseChain usage grows, PLSX has a mechanism that directly captures some of that activity.
That’s a pretty interesting design for an asset sitting this far below its highs.
$PLSX #PulseChain
Citi just moved its 12-month Bitcoin target from $82k → $113k and ETH from $2,240 → $3,028.
The targets themselves aren’t what I care about.
Look at why they changed them: renewed ETF inflows, stronger crypto activity and an improving macro backdrop.
BTC is around $85.4k this morning after softer US inflation reduced rate-hike expectations.
That gives us 3 things worth tracking now:
ETF flows + yields + spot demand.
If all three improve together, the institutional bull case gets much harder to dismiss.
If BTC rises while one starts deteriorating, that divergence is where I’d start getting cautious.
That’s the PIM signal I’m watching into October.
#Bitcoin
PIM CHECKED THIS 🔎
Here’s a PulseChain metric I think is more useful than watching $PLSX price all day.
In a recent 7-day snapshot:
• PulseChain DEX volume: $70.4M
• PulseX alone: $56.8M
• DEX aggregator activity: +103% WoW
• Around 799M PLSX bought & burned
But bridge flows were still net negative.
That last bit matters.
It tells us trading activity can accelerate before fresh capital is clearly flowing onto the chain.
So my PulseChain signal from here is simple:
DEX volume rising + bridge flows turning positive at the same time.
If those two start moving together, I’ll pay very close attention.
$PLS $PLSX #PulseChain
PIM MORNING SIGNAL 🔎
Something unusual is happening underneath Bitcoin.
US 10-year yields just hit roughly 5.3%, their highest in nearly two decades. Normally that kind of move is brutal for risk assets.
Yet BTC is still sitting around $83.5k after eight straight trading days of spot ETF inflows.
Here’s what I’m watching now:
$82–83k holds while yields stay elevated = buyers are absorbing the macro pressure.
If yields start falling and BTC still can’t reclaim $85k, that would actually concern me more.
Sometimes the useful signal isn’t the price moving. It’s the price refusing to move when it probably should.
#Bitcoin.
PulseChain is still sitting on one of the more interesting L1 designs in crypto.
Around 50k validators were active earlier this year, PulseX had already cleared $20B+ lifetime volume, and 1.7T+ PLSX had been permanently burned.
Yet attention and valuations are still nowhere near peak-cycle levels.
That’s why I’m bullish here. The network didn’t disappear when the hype did. The validators kept validating, the DEX kept trading and the burn kept running.
If liquidity properly rotates back into PulseChain, it’s coming back to infrastructure that already survived the quiet part.
$PLS $PLSX #PulseChain
I keep coming back to the same thing with $PLSX.
Every time PulseX gets busier, part of that activity feeds the buy & burn. We’ve already seen weeks where hundreds of millions of PLSX were bought and permanently removed while DEX volume was climbing.
So you’ve basically got an engine sitting there waiting for volume.
If PulseChain gets another serious liquidity cycle, it isn’t just prices that react — the underlying PLSX supply mechanics accelerate with it.
That’s a setup I think the market is massively underpricing.
$PLS $PLSX #PulseChain.
Aave is starting to look less like “crypto lending” and more like an actual onchain capital market.
Its V4 equities market on Base now lets eligible non-US users put tokenized Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft shares up as collateral and borrow USDC against them.
And Aave governance is already discussing more tokenized-equity markets on other chains.
This is where tokenization gets interesting for me. Owning a stock onchain is one thing. Being able to plug that stock straight into DeFi without selling it is completely different.
How long before borrowing against tokenized equities becomes normal?
#DeFi #RWA.
Why I asked those sites to fix their PulseChain pages.
A lot of articles still say PulseChain was a "snapshot" — that Ethereum's state was copied and loaded onto a new chain.
That is not what happened.
PulseChain is a hard fork of Ethereum mainnet.
Same genesis as Ethereum.
Same history from block 0.
No new genesis. No snapshot. No halt.
The fork activates at PrimordialPulseBlock 17,233,000.
You can check genesis yourself:
ipfs.scan.pulsechain.com/blo…
Hash:
0xd4e56740f876aef8c010b86a40d5f56745a118d0906a34e69aec8c0db1cb8fa3
That is Ethereum's genesis. PulseChain starts there.
"Snapshot" was the easy word. It helped people picture token copies showing up in the same address. I get why it spread. But it describes the wrong machine.
A snapshot is: freeze state, start a new chain.
A hard fork is: keep the original chain, change the rules at a block, continue.
Those are not the same thing. One implies a new beginning. The other is a continuation.
This matters more now than it did in 2023, because this is what AI reads.
Models do not pull truth out of the client. They read the internet. Ranked blogs, explainers, "what is PulseChain" pages. If those pages all say snapshot, the model says snapshot. Then the next article quotes the model. Then the next model trains on that. The error compounds.
I watched this happen. Ask an AI what PulseChain's fork was, and it will often give you the blog version — snapshot, new chain, state copied onto genesis — instead of the client version. Shared genesis. Full history. Hard fork at 17,233,000.
The official sources were never unclear. go-pulse, the node docs, the explorer. The secondary layer flattened it.
So I asked the sites that still say snapshot to update. Not to score points. So the public record matches the chain, and so the next thing that learns from the web learns the actual design.
If you write about PulseChain, please use hard fork. Point at genesis. Point at 17,233,000. The shorthand already did enough damage.
One PulseChain mechanic I still think gets nowhere near enough attention is the PLSX buy & burn.
By June, 1.74 TRILLION PLSX had already been permanently burned — about 8.23% of the original user supply. Another 5.37B disappeared in just that reported week.
And this isn’t a promised future token burn. PulseX trading itself drives it.
So if activity eventually comes back hard, the same volume everyone wants to see also accelerates removal of PLSX from supply.
That feedback loop gets very interesting in a proper bull market.
$PLSX $PLS #PulseChain



















