Perhaps the only time I have agreed with the FCA wrt Collateral
'Possible Key Messages'
"this is tricky since there aren't many/any redeeming factors of this"
I notified Baroness Morgan of the discrepancy between what Andrew Bailey knew and what he told her in November 2024.
@NigelCairn55406 @bir02677015
Replying to @RosieHeys
Honest I was only taking a photo of my bike when in France some years ago.
1
1
11
Whilst the FCA acknowledged in ICO case IC-316363-G8P2 “that there is a strong public interest towards transparency on matters relating to Collateral (UK) Ltd” this is another sample of what I am receiving.
So the FCA chose which Collateral complaints to 'investigate' and the rest will remain unanswered.
One standard letter to all investors.
Statutory failures, mandatory checks, deliberate exposure to a UCIS etc ..... all swept under the carpet.
Replying to @ixshopping @NigelCairn55406 @appgonifandffs @Carlier_J87 @TransparencyTF @bir02677015 @stevemiddi1
On Mr Bailey, am I allowed to say "economical with the truth" 18 months after the full facts were known?
Page 2 of my email to @TheFCA regarding Mr Rathi's interview on Money Box last weekend.
Replying to @TransparencyTF @BBCBreakfast
Has the FCA changed?
My email to the FCA yesterday suggests otherwise.
as shown in the second part of an email that I sent to @TheFCA yesterday.
After Nikhil Rathi's interview on Money Box regarding the @appgonifandffs report (which I gave evidence to) I felt I had to send the following email regarding Mr Rathi's misrepresentation of fact regarding Collateral.
@TransparencyTF











