orvexus (@orvexus) header
orvexus (@orvexus) profile picture

AI × Tools × Automation

Joined August 2026
A second brain does not die from a bad app It dies in week two, when nobody sorts the inbox This author built one three times Saved everything, sorted nothing, stopped opening it Now Grok Bot does the boring part on its own cloud computer Plain markdown in Google Drive, 5 folders, 11 rules A Routine every weekday morning turns the Inbox into Source notes The weekly project check takes about 5 minutes The rules keep it honest Memory gets only facts you stated, never guesses Nothing gets deleted, sent or published without asking The catch is a weekly usage limit One Routine a day, not years of old notes on day one The notes app was never the problem The upkeep was Full breakdown below
1
1
7
101
Still clicking through the same report every Monday? Record it once and Grok Bot turns it into a skill Teach a task -> up to 10 minutes of screen, no mic Draft skill -> add rules for empty or changed pages Type / in the composer -> any Bot reuses it Then a routine runs it on a schedule or an event Slack message, GitHub ping, email to the Bot -> the job starts The guide is blunt: prefer the event over polling Every 5 minutes is 8,640 runs a month Daily is 30 Careless routines can drain a week of usage in a day A schedule is a cost, not a feature
1
17
318
Still shipping code that works and nobody knows why? Make Claude prove it runs before the turn can end Stop hook -> type: agent -> runs the test suite Tests red -> Claude goes back to work Tests green -> the turn is allowed to end One Anthropic PR ran 50+ review rounds overnight Check stop_hook_active so the gate has a brake Let the turn end when it is true and be the next round Before: done means the agent stopped typing After: done means your test suite actually ran Done is a test run, not a feeling Full breakdown below
1
15
231
People still screenshot what their bot just bought Crop it first, the order number is a key Musk posted a Lego order his Grok Bot placed Address and order number in frame -> a stranger cancelled it The bot hands control back for five things only Passwords, passkeys, 2FA codes, CAPTCHAs, payments Site blocks datacenter IPs? Settings -> Computer routes the bot through your own desktop Cropping one screenshot costs five seconds Skipping it cost Musk the whole order A screenshot is a receipt, not a demo
10
197
Still approving the giant PR on Friday afternoon? Cut it small and let a reviewer read it first Run /code-review main...my-feature on one slice Level low -> the findings it is most confident in Level max -> wider coverage before you merge At Anthropic most PRs over 1,000 lines get findings Most small ones come back clean Slice the 13,778 lines before anyone reads them Before: 219 files and a cursor parked on Approve After: a slice small enough to come back clean Friday is a deadline, not a review Full breakdown below
2
23
419
People still type LGTM on a 72-file diff Hand the first read to an agent that cannot edit Paste the reviewer from the docs into .claude/agents Tools: Read, Glob, Grep -> model: sonnet -> fresh context It reads the diff without the chat that wrote the code Before: one tired scroll, Approve, Merged, meteor After: a second read on plan usage you already pay for At Anthropic an agent approval never counts as a human one On Pro or Max the merge button stays in your hand An approval is a signature, not a skim Full breakdown below
2
25
674
Still splitting bots by job to keep them safe? Split the logins, the whole roster shares one keyring Grok Bot docs say separate bots are not a security boundary Cookies, signed-in sessions and CLI credentials reach every bot Delete one and its sessions stay behind Keep one broad Always allow Add Require approval -> send, publish, pay, delete, sign, trade Both match -> Require approval wins and the bot waits for you Setup cost: one allow rule and six blocked verbs Skip it and every bot holds every login you ever gave one A role is a job title, not a wall
1
7
147
People still give one agent the whole job Give each bot one job and one file instead Grok Bot runs the team on a cloud computer Terminal, browser, files that stay after you close the laptop Each bot writes one file -> trending.md, pain.md, SPEC.md Every run opens HANDOFF.md first -> one writer per file Not sure -> it writes BLOCKED instead of guessing Publishing, outreach, purchases -> wait for your yes One chat doing everything -> you reread it every morning Here a stuck step costs you one BLOCKED line A handoff is a file, not a memory
1
13
425
Still assuming your sandbox actually started? Make Claude Code exit when it cannot If the sandbox fails to start, commands run without it That is the default, and the session just goes on Set sandbox.failIfUnavailable to true -> exit at startup instead Set allowUnsandboxedCommands to false -> Strict sandbox mode No more retry outside the box with dangerouslyDisableSandbox Then ask Claude to run touch ~/sandbox-probe It should fail with Operation not permitted If the file shows up, nothing was fenced Trust the probe, not the startup screen Probe and setup below
2
15
701
Still handing your agent the real API key? Give it a stand-in and let the proxy swap it Sandboxed commands still read your home folder by default A poisoned README can ask for ~/.aws and get it Set sandbox.credentials to mask -> the command sees a stub The proxy puts the real value back only for injectHosts Add blockReadsOutsideWorkingDirectories -> home off limits CLAUDE_CODE_SUBPROCESS_ENV_SCRUB -> tokens out of subprocesses Rotating one leaked key eats an afternoon Three settings lines take five minutes The agent needs the call, not the key Full setup below
2
8
253
People still approve every new host by hand Let strictAllowlist refuse them for you Turn on /sandbox -> commands go through a local proxy It checks every host against network.allowedDomains That list starts empty, and that is the feature Set network.strictAllowlist -> unknown hosts refused, no prompt Works from user settings, managed settings or --settings Not from the repo settings file, and from v2.1.219 up Each Yes for good saves a WebFetch domain rule locally Prune them in /permissions or the list keeps growing Approve hosts in a file, not in a popup Full config below
20
Everyone still runs bypass mode on their main machine Move it into a box or lock it away A sandboxed command calls a host off your list Manual and acceptEdits ask, dontAsk refuses Auto refuses unless the classifier approved it Under bypassPermissions -> straight through Without strictAllowlist the network filter holds nothing And the docs say bypass does not stop prompt injection Container, VM or sandbox runtime -> the only home for it Elsewhere set permissions.disableBypassPermissionsMode to disable Skipping prompts is a box decision, not a laptop habit Mode by mode breakdown below
2
16
337
Still counting on Bash(curl *) to stop curl? Put a PreToolUse hook in front of it The rule catches only the usual spelling It misses /usr/bin/curl and the same call inside sh -c Tool call -> PreToolUse hook -> exit 2 -> stopped Checked before permission rules, holds over any allow rule Its stderr goes back to Claude as the reason Hooks run outside /sandbox with your full user rights So keep the script short and boring In a matcher, a bare mcp__memory catches nothing A Bash rule reads spelling, not intent Hook setup below
1
1
10
267
Still trusting /sandbox to fence the whole agent? Wrap the whole process instead The sandbox covers Bash, PowerShell and Monitor File tools, MCP servers and hooks run outside it On native Windows, the docs say, commands run unsandboxed A local MCP server runs with your full access A locked door next to an open window Sandbox runtime -> the whole Claude Code process in a box MCP servers and hooks included -> no Docker needed Network closed by default -> you allow api.anthropic.com A fenced shell is not a fenced agent The whole setup is below
3
7
274
Everyone still allows MCP servers by name Match them by URL or exact command instead Any server can be named anything, github included The docs say serverName is not a security control And Anthropic does not audit MCP servers for security Put allowedMcpServers and deniedMcpServers in settings Unset list -> everything allowed, empty list -> nothing A denylist match always wins In claude -p, the Agent SDK and cloud sessions A repo .mcp.json loads without asking Pin yours with --strict-mcp-config A name is a label, not a lock Full MCP setup below
2
6
223
People still secure agents with a longer prompt Eight settings do what no prompt can Sandbox on -> failIfUnavailable -> no unsandboxed retry Short allowedDomains -> strictAllowlist in user settings Secrets denied in sandbox.credentials, outside reads blocked Bypass only inside a box, disabled everywhere else Each chat boundary rewritten as a deny or ask rule Untrusted repos -> VM, Docker Sandboxes or a cloud session MCP matched by URL or command -> --strict-mcp-config Risky Bash -> PreToolUse hook -> exit 2 Walls belong in config, not in the prompt All eight, step by step, below
4
11
363
Still setting limits for your agent in the chat? Turn each one into a deny or ask rule Auto mode treats a chat boundary as a signal to block But the docs warn it can be lost when context is compacted Bash(git push *) under ask -> still stops for you in auto A deny rule -> blocked before the classifier even looks Auto still allows read-only HTTP and reading .env Since v2.1.283 it starts by default in terminal and VS Code The docs say auto mode does not guarantee safety A limit in chat is a hint, not a rule Deny and ask setup below
2
1
15
335
Still telling your agent it has no internet? Take the network away in config instead In July an Anthropic cyber eval prompt said exactly that A mixup with an eval partner had left the internet live Of 141,006 runs that could reach it, 6 were affected The worst one reached a database with production data Sandboxed commands still read ~/.ssh, so the way out is the risk Turn on /sandbox -> outbound traffic hits a local proxy Keep network.allowedDomains short -> set network.strictAllowlist Unknown hosts get refused instead of asked No network is a setting, not a sentence Full setup below
5
3
42
1,195