Partner @AllendeyBrea - Director @cetysedu @udesa - Fellow @futureofprivacy Ai, IP & IT law & Arbitration - Rebellions are built on hope-
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined March 2008
- Tweets27.2K
- Following5.1K
- Followers5.7K
- Likes41.2K
Pinned Tweet
Nueva edición de “Delitos contra la intimidad informática” (2ª edición, 2025).
Link índice y prólogo: lnkd.in/dYztAhPE
📕Se consigue en Librería Praxis lnkd.in/dmdXMpJ
pablopalazzi retweeted
Messi got an ovation from a packed theater in Spain on Friday, with the King and Queen in the room, and he gave it about 30 seconds with his eyes on the floor, fiddling with his jacket button.
Then you see who else was on that stage.
One of them was Christina Koch. She flew around the Moon back in April, the first woman ever to do it.
Three more were the scientists who made reading DNA cheap. Two Cambridge chemists, David Klenerman and Shankar Balasubramanian, plus a French biophysicist named Pascal Mayer. Their work took the cost of reading one full human genome from over a billion dollars and about a decade down to roughly a thousand bucks and a single day. The company the two chemists started became Illumina, and most DNA sequencing on the planet still runs on their method.
Studio Ghibli was up there too, the studio behind Spirited Away, along with Patti Smith and the novelist Julian Barnes.
Messi was the most famous person in that building by a mile. Spanish reporters in the room said it looked like he didn't want to pull any of the spotlight off everyone else, so he let the applause go and got out of the way.
The award is the Princess of Asturias, which people in Spain call the Spanish Nobel. The same foundation honored Nelson Mandela back in 1992.
Football has had a weird history with this prize. Brazil's national team won it in 2002, Spain's won in 2010, and Casillas and Xavi shared it in 2012. In 2009 the jury had a Barcelona team that had just won the treble with a 22-year-old Messi, and they voted it out before the final round. A Russian pole vaulter ended up winning.
Seventeen years later, he's the first footballer to ever win it by himself.
Princess Leonor handed it to him and told the room she wasn't sure anything else on earth could make the whole world feel the same thing at the same moment.
He didn't give a speech. A guy with eight Ballon d'Ors was standing next to the people who made the genome cheap to read and a woman who'd just been to the Moon, and he treated his own ovation like he was holding up the line.
pablopalazzi retweeted
"¿Quién juzga a las máquinas?"
Esta fue mi presentación del evento que organizamos en el Parque de la Innovación de Buenos Aires.
- ¿Cómo se resuelven disputas entre agentes de IA?
- ¿Quién responde cuando alguno se equivoca?
- ¿Deben tener personalidad jurídica?
- ¿Tienen derechos?
- ¿Deberían recibir un juicio justo?
Algunas de las preguntas clave en los próximos años del derecho.
Charla magistral: ¿Quién decide cuando dos agentes de IA entran en conflicto?
Federico Ast (Kleros)
youtu.be/Nug052j9xKY
pablopalazzi retweeted
Judge's use of "AI agent" led to "a botch job, to say the least."
District court judge Henry Wingate issued a TRO "that contained several factual assertions nowhere to be found in the record, or indeed, in any proceeding of the case."
The TRO mentioned parties not in the case, declarations "from non-existent or never-present individuals," fake quotes supposedly from the text of the bill at issue, and several other "erroneous claims."
"After this came to light, Judge Wingate replaced the TRO without explaining."
The judge later claimed "a law clerk had used AI to assist drafting an earlier version of the TRO that was docketed by mistake."
But even the "corrected TRO ... still contained hallucinated information."
"The district court—or perhaps, being charitable, its AI agent—ignored and manipulated governing law, apparently to satisfy a policy agenda."
The "legal analysis [was] so poor that it hardly deserves the label."
Fifth Circuit vacates and remands the case for reassignment to a new judge.
pablopalazzi retweeted
Tengo 5' para hablar de incidentes de Ciberseguridad en la @mediapartyorg 🤷🏽
Es un trabajo que hicieron/mos con María Trevisani y Paula Szewach con la línea de tiempo para promover su visibilizacion (fuera del nicho)
Dicen q tienen que ser provocadoras. Ojo con las sugerencias.
pablopalazzi retweeted
El futbolista Leo Messi, el bajista Paul McCartney, el escritor Cervantes, el fisico Newton
El futbolista Leo Messi, Premio Princesa de Asturias de los Deportes 2026, ya está en Asturias y las gaitas han sonado en su honor.
©FPA
#PremiosPrincesadeAsturias #LeoMessi #Deportes #Asturias
@bgcorvera @Embespargentina @ARGenesp
pablopalazzi retweeted
If you catch the other side's fake citations, start a separate task code that same day. In Flycatcher v. Ozmos (S.D.N.Y.), the defense lawyer who caught them got paid on October 9 for 24.1 hours spent on the misconduct and another 49.1 hours on the fee briefs, less a 10% trim. The court required contemporaneous records showing the date, the hours, and the work for each attorney.
When the petition's due, dump the entries into Claude and have it sort them by task and total the hours. Then check every line against your actual bills, because the other side is going to.
pablopalazzi retweeted
In Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, a federal judge in Jacksonville found at least two fake citations in a lawyer's memorandum when the lawyer filed two notices of errata to correct it. One case didn't exist, and another didn't contain the quote attributed to it. The lawyer told the court he was rushing a deadline and didn't properly review material that came from AI research.
By the hearing, he'd already apologized to his client and opposing counsel, given his entire fee, about $10,000, to Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, done 7.5 hours of AI ethics CLE, and changed his office procedures. On October 9 the court called those steps "a suitable remedy" and took no further action. More of this, please.
Esto es como too much!!!!, el nuevo informe de la ONU en materia de privacidad sobre “Herramientas jurídicas para la transferencia internacional de datos personales” cita mi lbro sobre Contratos de transferencia internacional !!!!!!!! documents.un.org/doc/undoc/g…
ALT Palazzi scc
ALT Pablo palazzi scc book
pablopalazzi retweeted
La Autoridad Nacional de Ciberseguridad de Estados Unidos.
🚨 Organizations should immediately patch critical PHP vulnerabilities CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619. These vulnerabilities enable unauthenticated #RCE and affect PHP installations serving web requests. Learn more: 🔗 go.dhs.gov/5Hi
pablopalazzi retweeted
“¿Quién juzga a las máquinas? El derecho en la era de las multitudes y los algoritmos” reunió en el Parque de la Innovación de Buenos Aires a abogados, legisladores, funcionarios, emprendedores y estudiantes para discutir una pregunta que hasta hace muy poco parecía ciencia ficción: ¿qué le pasa al derecho cuando las transacciones las empiezan a ejecutar agentes de IA?
La idea inicial de @Kleros_io nació del caso de una emprendedora y un freelancer de países diferentes que contratan por internet y tienen una disputa por unos pocos cientos de dólares, sin ningún tribunal al que recurrir.
Hoy el problema escala a otra dimensión: agentes que compran, negocian y contratan con otros agentes, en nombre de sus dueños, a una velocidad que ninguna institución pensada para humanos puede seguir.
En mi presentación, traté una serie de preguntas difíciles que surgen en esta nueva era.
Si un agente causa un daño, ¿quién responde? ¿Qué hacemos cuando no es un agente sino un enjambre? ¿Tienen responsabilidad solidaria? ¿Pueden las IA tener personalidad jurídica? ¿Deberían tener derechos?
Para pensarlo, volvimos a la Junta de Valladolid y a Jeremy Bentham: la discusión sobre quién merece consideración moral tiene siglos, y ahora suma un sujeto nuevo.
El primer panel fue sobre la gobernanza de este nuevo mundo. Alejandro Ramírez, Inspector General de Justicia de la Nación, presentó la reforma de la Ley de Sociedades con dos figuras nuevas: las DAOs y las sociedades automatizadas. @DaroNieto, legislador porteño, explicó qué se puede regular de la IA y qué no. @pablopalazzi recorrió la historia de la regulación de internet y qué podemos aprender de ella.
El segundo panel fue sobre la implementación práctica de la IA en el derecho. @blockya_, @tanofaila (@lemonapp_ar) y @facundo_trotz (@kleros_es) hablaron de cómo cambia el trabajo del abogado cuando la IA ya es la base: qué revisar, qué contarle al cliente, qué dicen la ética profesional y los colegios, y qué pasa con las alucinaciones. Y también de cómo la IA puede ser una herramienta para el acceso a la justicia.
La conversación sobre el derecho en la era de los agentes ya no es una especulación de nicho. Está en la agenda de los reguladores, de los legisladores y de los estudios jurídicos.
Estoy muy feliz de que Kleros haya podido abrir un foro donde estos temas se discuten hoy y en Buenos Aires, con muchas de las personas que trabajan en resolverlos.
Gracias a @dzapatillas por moderar los dos paneles, a los panelistas por el nivel del debate, al Parque de la Innovación por recibirnos y a todos los que vinieron y llenaron la sala de preguntas! 🤖⚖️🇦🇷
Pronto salen los videos!
pablopalazzi retweeted
🤩 ¡Felicitaciones a nuestros socios!
🎬Gracias a todos los que nos acompañaron en la Presentación del Libro: Historia de la Corte Suprema Tomo IV - 2015 - 2025, de los autores Alfonso Santiago, @JLauAlberdi y Alberto B. Bianchi editado por @MarcialPonsARG
👉 tinyurl.com/yjaembdm
#AustralDerecho
pablopalazzi retweeted
Don't hand your expert a citation table AI built. In LeDoux v. Outliers (W.D. Wash.), plaintiff's counsel admitted she used Claude or ChatGPT to "generate a formatted citation table" for academic articles and gave the same table to two experts as an appendix. Neither caught the errors. On August 18 the court excluded a third expert over hallucinated citations sitting only in parts of his report the plaintiff had already withdrawn, said they undermined the entire report, and granted the defense summary judgment.
Before you serve a report, have Claude pull every source in the reliance list into a table with the cite and the page the expert relies on. Then the expert opens each one and confirms it says what the report says.
pablopalazzi retweeted
The NSA is telling American companies to take production systems offline. The AI-era of cybersecurity has fully arrived.
Effective Immediately, all organizations using PHP for their systems are advised to be prepared for an update addressing two critical vulnerabilities. PHP is widely used for web applications. These vulnerabilities often provide a direct path to the server's file system or database. If an immediate update is not feasible, it is recommend that organizations take the system offline until it can be fully mitigated. NSA will follow up shortly with more specific guidance.
pablopalazzi retweeted
When somebody says "I cite-checked it," ask which check they mean. Does the case exist? Is the quote in it? Does it say what the brief says it says? Is it still good law? Those are four separate steps. Garcia in Colorado was a quote that wasn't in the case, Kid International in Florida was a case that didn't exist, and Aguilar in Massachusetts was a real case cited for something it doesn't say.
pablopalazzi retweeted
The other side's table of authorities is a to-do list. Paste their brief into Claude and have it list every case, pincite, and quotation. Then pull the cases yourself and check that each one exists, says what the brief says it says, and contains the quoted language.
Do it before your response is due, with enough time left to decide whether to call opposing counsel first or go straight to the court. Virginia's draft ethics opinion on this suggests reaching out to the other lawyer first is an option. And if the cites all hold up, you've still done your job by reading the cases your opponent thinks win it for them. Win/win.
pablopalazzi retweeted
Virginia's State Bar has a draft ethics opinion out, LEO 1902, on what you owe the court when the other side files AI-hallucinated cites. The draft says a lawyer who finds "material misstatements of law or fact, false quotations, or erroneous citations in an adversary's pleading should bring these issues to the attention of the court," and that whether AI was used "is largely irrelevant." Reading the other side's filings closely, it says, is part of diligence.
On bar complaints, it points to Rule 8.3 and warns against filing or threatening one solely to gain an advantage in a civil case. Comments closed July 10 and I couldn't find that it's been adopted. Worth watching either way.
pablopalazzi retweeted
Just realized George Church, who I know well and is the Harvard/MIT genetics legend, CRISPR pioneer, and one of the most important scientists alive, is raising for his gene therapy company Rejuvenate Bio on Wefunder.
This is equity crowdfunding under Regulation CF. Everyday people (not just VCs or the ultra-rich) can invest as little as a few hundred dollars and own actual equity in a company spun out of his lab. One-shot AAV therapies that have already shown heart disease reversal in dogs, with years of safety data, and a path toward humans.
For most of history, this kind of science was locked behind elite institutions and big checks. Now a founder of Church’s stature and his partners are deliberately opening the round to the broader community, and it’s working (oversubscribed, ranked #1 by Kingscrowd).
Rejuvenate Bio spun out of my lab at Harvard, and I co-founded it. One injection reverses cardiac disease in dogs, with three years of safety data and zero safety issues. They’ve raised $3.2M+ and 1,250+ investors are in, and Kingscrowd ranks the round #1 in the country. It closes soon: wefunder.com/rejuvenatebio
pablopalazzi retweeted
Catching the other side's fake citations is starting to pay. In Noland v. Land of the Free, the California Court of Appeal refused in 2025 to award the defendants sanctions, because they never flagged the fabricated citations and seemed to learn of them only from the court's order to show cause.
On October 9, Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Flycatcher v. Ozmos (S.D.N.Y.) awarded $38,877.59 in fees and costs to the defense lawyer who investigated and reported his opponent's AI-hallucinated citations. She called it a "significant service" to the court and agreed that courts depend on lawyers to bring this stuff to their attention. Read the cites, y’all.
pablopalazzi retweeted
News from 🇺🇾: reformas en el Código Procesal, incluyendo cuestiones tecnológicas
📍🆕
2026-7 / Novedades procesales de primavera en la Ley N° 20.531, de 1 de octubre de 2026 (rendición de cuentas):
linkedin.com/pulse/2026-7-no…
