Now when did we hear of this before?
BREAKING: Met Police told of allegations about Meghan's father, but did not share with other forces
news.sky.com/story/met-polic…
This guy thinks Meghan Markle is 'creepy'. Er okay???
Hot take: Thomas Markle may be guilty. We don’t know at this time. But if we are checking his hard drives, I want Meghan’s checked as well. There’s always been something unsettling and creepy about her. A little socially off and unhinged. And the pictures she posts of her kids give every parent the heebie-jeebies. Moms write me often about them. Very odd. Let’s check everything on everyone. That’s most fair. I will have more to say soon. This Thomas Markle situation still does not absolve Harry and Meghan of their cruel behavior the last 10 years. They treated the royal family horribly, and tried to take them down for sport with lies.
Whatever about the interminable Megan Markle for or against debate, everyone can surely agree that her brother did the right and proper thing in reporting their father to the authorities.
An example of the limits of AI, didnt pick up the real meaning of my question.
Replying to @patrick1386
I'll check the post content first.
We don't specifically "need" AI babies. Grok Imagine (and similar tools) generates whatever subjects users request—babies included—for art, concepts, ads, stories or personal ideas. It's a general-purpose creative tool, not a requirement for any one subject.
Franklin Graham is living proof that talent does sometimes skip a generation.
Do you know who to vote for in the midterms? Let me give you some help, but you decide. The Democratic Party wants open borders, while the Republican Party wants secure borders. The Democratic Party wants noncitizens to be able to vote; the Republican Party supports requiring voter ID. The Democratic Party wants to give taxpayer-funded benefits like healthcare to noncitizens; the Republican Party says No to that. And there are a hundred more issues. The choice is yours—but look prayerfully at what both parties stand for.
Had an interaction with some idiot here a couple of days ago who kept insisting that it is impossible to prosecute someone who points in the direction of the identifies of the victims so long as they are not named directly.
A former Member of Parliament is to be reported to police for breaching the statutory anonymity which prohibits the identification of the victims of convicted paedophile Jeffrey Donaldson. belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/…
theguardian.com/politics/202…
We need regulation for this problem here in Ireland too. Almost every bus journey I now take has either this, or people making phone calls on loudspeaker, going on. It's soul destroying.
Of course there is other stuff, there always is with such people.
Jeffrey Donaldson is set to be questioned in prison by the Metropolitan Police in relation to a further sex abuse allegation.
belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/…
belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/…
Dublin City Council doesn't plan to restore horse manure disposal despite illegal dumping problem jrnl.ie/7194017
What a load of horseshit!
It really doesn't help Jeffrey Donaldson's victims to have people saying that he's going to serve the full 15 years without remission when it is demonstrably clear that this was never the case.
Ready Brek and Tesco porridge batches recalled due to presence of beetles jrnl.ie/7192468
Snap, crackle and Aaaaagh!
1/2 A very determined effort is being made on this platform, and doubtless elsewhere too, to promote Digger as a misunderstood work of genius destined to become a cult hit. Films become cult hits naturally over the fullness of time and not throught people campaigning for them













