cloud. 𐙚 ʚɞ

He appreciates everything. That's it right? Anyway, thank you for gifts. Thank you for showing everyone how you all thought he should be appreciated. What drove you to go through with all this & have everything reach this point was the false sense of oversight that gave you the "impression" that this was all fair to begin with. • "balance the situation as much as possible" BUT "reducing certain costs associated with one partner" --- how do you even contradict yourself in the exact same sentence? • "reduce the remaining costs on one side in order to be able to invest more in the other" --- You said you wanted "balance", no? • His camera & his blanket = "items we wanted to use to balance the situation" --- if you wanted to "preserve the individuality" of the gifts for each person, shouldn't the couple items be the ones you use to pacify your costs & not the gifts for one person alone? • "We do not see the difference in monetary value as a difference in the thought or consideration behind each individual gift proposed by the community." --- Oh, but that's what you presented, decided, & carried out? That's what you've shown publicly for everyone & probably even him to see? That's what you've decided he deserved? + No Middle Riddle IG Highlight + No "The Jigsoul" IG post He does not deserve the bare mininum "at least" statements --- "at least respect him/at least be kind to him/at least be fair to him"; he does not deserve an "ohhh, but we do appreciate him more than this/this doesn't fully show how much we truly love him." It would be nicer to actually be able to concretely reflect him as a intricate person who is known for his unique, genuine interests, & not just 'cause he's known for his basic human functions. Polls, forms, proposal lists are suggestions that should guide you, not dictate/overrule you in exercising fairness in situations like this. Although, gotta say --- not an isolated case at all. You're not the first to outrightly do this to him & not see how there's anything wrong with it.